[
ADNAN, N. – NORDIN, S. M. – BIN ABU BAKAR, Z. 2017. Understanding and facilitating sustainable agricultural practice: A comprehensive analysis of adoption behaviour among Malaysian paddy farmers. In Land Use Policy, vol. 68, pp. 372–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ADRIAN, A. M. – NORWOOD, S. H. – MASK, P. L. 2005. Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. In Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 256–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AHMADI, K. – EBADZADEH, H. – ABDSHAH, H. – KAZEMIAN, A. – RAFIEI, M. 2017. Agricultural statistics for the crop year 2015–2016. The first volume: Crops: Ministry of Jihad and Agriculture, Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AJZEN, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AMMANN, J. – UMSTÄTTER, C. – EL BENNI, N. 2022. The adoption of precision agriculture enabling technologies in Swiss outdoor vegetable production: A Delphi study. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 23, pp. 1354–1374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09889-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANSARI, N. – REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – FATEMI, M. 2019. Viewpoints of experts of agricultural jihad centers toward the agricultural extension: New approach in Fars Province. In European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AUBERT, B. A. – SCHROEDER, A. – GRIMAUDO, J. 2012. IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers’ adoption decision of precision agriculture technology. In Decision support systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 510–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BAGHERI, A. – BONDORI, A. – ALLAHYARI, M. S. – SURUJLAL, J. 2021. Use of biologic inputs among cereal farmers: Application of technology acceptance model. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, pp. 5165–5181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00808-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARNES, A. P. – SOTO, I. – EORY, V. – BECK, B. – BALAFOUTIS, A. – SÁNCHEZ, B. – VANGEYTE, J. – FOUNTAS, S. – VAN DER WAL, T. – GÓMEZ-BARBERO, M. 2019. Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers. In Land Use Policy, vol. 80, pp. 163–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BORGES, J. A. R. – LANSINK, A. G. J. M. O. 2016. Identifying psychological factors that determine cattle farmers’ intention to use improved natural grassland. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 89–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLARK, L. A. – WATSON, D. 1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. In Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DAVIS, F. D. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 475–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DAVIS, F. D. – BAGOZZI, R. P. – WARSHAW, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. In Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DAVIS, F. D. – VENKATESH, V. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EDWARDS-JONES, G. 2006. Modelling farmer decision-making: Concepts, progress and challenges. In Animal Science, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 783–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ASC2006112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAR, S. T. – REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. 2017. Determinants of Iranian agricultural consultants’ intentions toward precision agriculture: Integrating innovativeness to the technology acceptance model. In Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 280–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FLETT, R. – ALPASS, F. – HUMPHRIES, S. – MASSEY, C. – MORRISS, S. – LONG, N. 2004. The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming. In Agricultural Systems, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 199–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FLORESS, K. – DE JALÓN, S. G. – CHURCH, S. P. – BABIN, N. – ULRICHSCHAD, J. D. – PROKOPY, L. S. 2017. Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: Dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 73–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FORNELL, C. – LARCKER, D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 382–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FU, J.-R. – FARN, C.-K. – CHAO, W.-P. 2006. Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. In Information and Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 109–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GANDORFER, M. – SCHLEICHER, S. – ERDLE, K. 2018. Barriers to adoption of smart farming technologies in Germany. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Monticello, IL : International Society of Precision Agriculture, pp. 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRANIĆ, A. – MARANGUNIĆ, N. 2019. Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. In British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HENSELER, J. – RINGLE, C. M. – SARSTEDT, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. In Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, pp. 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HENSELER, J. – SARSTEDT, M. 2013. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. In Computational Statistics, vol. 28, pp. 565–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ISPA. 2018. Precision agriculture definition. Available at: https://www.ispag.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAFARI, N. – KARAMI, E. A. – KESHAVARZ, M. 2020. The impacts of the new agricultural extension system on improving knowledge and changing the behavior of farmers in Fars Province. In Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/IAEEJ.2020.243857.1551 (In Persian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOKAR, N. K. – NOORHOSSEINI, S. A. – ALLAHYARI, M. S. – DAMALAS, C. A. 2017. Consumers’ acceptance of medicinal herbs: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). In Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 207, pp. 203–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOLADY, D. E. – VAN DER SLUIS, E. – UDDIN, M. M. – DEUTZ, A. P. 2021. Determinants of adoption and adoption intensity of precision agriculture technologies: Evidence from South Dakota. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 22, pp. 689–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09750-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOUFARIS, M. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. In Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 205–223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEE, Y. – KOZAR, K. A. – LARSEN, K. R. T. 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. In Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MACKENZIE, S. B. – PODSAKOFF, P. M. – JARVIS, C. B. 2005. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. In Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 710–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MCBRIDE, W. D. – DABERKOW, S. G. 2003. Information and the adoption of precision farming technologies. In Journal of Agribusiness, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.14671
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ALJAAFREH, A. – ELZAGZOUG, E. Y. – ABUKHAIT, J. – SOLIMAN, A.-H. – ALJA’AFREH, S. S. – SIVANATHAN, A. – HUGHES, J. 2023. A real-time olive fruit detection for harvesting robot based on Yolo algorithms. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 121–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILLS, J. – GASKELL, P. – INGRAM, J. – DWYER, J. – REED, M. – SHORT, C. 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. In Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 34, pp. 283–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUN, Y. Y. – JACKSON, J. D. – PARK, J. S. – PROBST, J. C. 2006. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. In Information & Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 350–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PATHAK, H. S. – BROWN, P. – BEST, T. 2019. A systematic literature review of the factors affecting the precision agriculture adoption process. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 20, pp. 1292–1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09653-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAUSTIAN, M. – THEUVSEN, L. 2017. Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 18, pp. 701–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9482-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REICHARDT, M. – JÜRGENS, C. 2009. Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: Results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 10, pp. 73–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9101-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – FATEMI, M. 2019. Strategies for improvement of agricultural extension new approach of Iran. In Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, vol. 15 no. 2, pp. 112–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/IAEEJ.2020.199832.1450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – SALEHI, S. 2010. Agricultural specialists’ intention toward precision agriculture technologies: Integrating innovation characteristics to technology acceptance model. In African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1191–1199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROGERS, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York : Free Press, 512 pp. ISBN 0029266505.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RÖLING, N. – PRETTY, J. N. 1997. Chapter 20 Extension’s role in sustainable agricultural development. In SWANSON, B. E. – BENTZ, R. P. – SOFRANKO, A. J. (eds). Improving Agricultural Extension: A reference Manual. Rome, Italy : FAO, pp. 181–192. ISBN 92-5-104007-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHUKAT, S. – HEISE, H. 2021. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intentions and actual use of smart products among German farmers. In Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, article no. 6666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126666
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SILVA, A. G. – CANAVARI, M. – SIDALI, K. L. 2017. A technology acceptance model of common bean growers’ intention to adopt integrated production in the Brazilian Central Region. In Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 131–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/boku-2017-0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TEO, T. S. H. – SRIVASTAVA, S. C.– JIANG, L. 2008. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. In Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 99–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VECCHIO, Y. – AGNUSDEI, G. P. – MIGLIETTA, P. P. – CAPITANIO, F. 2020. Adoption of precision farming tools: The case of Italian farmers. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, article no. 869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030869
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VENKATESH, V. – DAVIS, F. D. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. In Decision Sciences, vol. 27 no. 3, pp. 451–481.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VENKATESH, V. – MORRIS, M. G. – DAVIS, G. B. – DAVIS, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. In MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WETZELS, M. – ODEKERKEN-SCHRÖDER, G. – VAN OPPEN, C. 2009. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. In MIS Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 177–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WU, J.-H. – WANG, S.-C. 2005. What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. In Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 719–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WU, W. W. 2010. Linking Bayesian networks and PLS path modeling for causal analysis. In Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 134–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.021
]Search in Google Scholar