Comparison of Accommodation Speed and Reading Accuracy for Conventional and Digital Rear-View Mirrors with Emphasis on Overall Traffic Safety

1ACOCK, A. C. – STAVIG, G. R. 1979. A measure of association for nonparametric statistics. In Social Forces, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1381–1386. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/sf/57.4.1381Search in Google Scholar

2ADRIAN, J. – PIEYRE, J. – LEBRUN, J. – MOHAND-SAID, S. – GUTMAN, E. 2017. Blind spot warning interface adapted to older drivers with early stage visual impairment. In 25^th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Detroit, Michigan, USA, paper Number 17-0190.Search in Google Scholar

3BABU, S. S. – POVÝŠIL, J. – HRUŠKA, M. – VACULÍK, P. – BENDA, P. – ZIFIA, A. M. – FŮS, M. 2022. Assessment of the new digital side mirror technology from driver´s subjective point of view considering traffic safety. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 122–130. DOI: doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0019Search in Google Scholar

4BECK, D. – JUNG, J. – PARK, W. 2021. Evaluating the effects of in-vehicle side-view display layout design on physical demands of driving. In Human Factors, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 348–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819884781Search in Google Scholar

5BENJAMIN, W. J. 2006. Borish’s Clinical Refraction. In Elsevier Health Sciences. E-Book., vol. 2, pp. 178–199. ISBN 978-0-7506-7524-6.Search in Google Scholar

6CAPPARELLA, J. 2018. The Lexus ES will be the first mass-produced car with cameras instead of side-view mirrors. Available at: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a23103910/lexus-es-side-mirror-camera-digital/Search in Google Scholar

7CRAMÉR, H. 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics (PMS-9), Volume 9. Princeton, USA : Princeton University Press. 575 pp. ISBN 9780691005478.Search in Google Scholar

8DIN EN ISO 8596: 2018. Ophthalmic optics – Visual acuity testing – Standardized and clinical optotypes and their presentation. Praha : Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví.Search in Google Scholar

9DOWLEN, C. 2013. Automobile design history: What can we learn from the behavior at the edges? In International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 177–192. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.768372Search in Google Scholar

10EDWARDS, C. – HANKEY, J. – KIEFER, R. – GRIMM, D. – LEASK, N. 2011. Understanding driver perceptions of a vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication system using a test track demonstration. In SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Mechanical Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 444–461. DOI: doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0577Search in Google Scholar

11ELVIK, R. 2005. Speed and road safety: Synthesis of evidence from evaluation studies. In Transportation Research Record, vol. 1908, no. 1, pp. 59–69. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190800108Search in Google Scholar

12FEELWORLD. 2017. FEELWORLD F570 5.7-inch small 4K HDMI on camera field monitor. Product catalogue. Available at: www.feelworld.cn/ShowInfo.aspx?id=519&py=Search in Google Scholar

13GLASSER, A. – CAMPBELL, M. C. W. 1999. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. In Vision Research, vo. 39, no. 11, pp. 1991–2015. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00283-1Search in Google Scholar

14HÄNE, C. – HENG, L. – LEE, G. H. – FRAUNDORFER, F. – FURGALE, P. – SATTLER, T. – POLLEFEYS, M. 2017. 3D visual perception for self-driving cars using a multi-camera system: Calibration, mapping, localization, and obstacle detection. In Image and Vision Computing, vol. 68, pp. 14–27. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2017.07.003Search in Google Scholar

15HRUŠKA, M. – JINDRA, P. 2016. Presentation title: Ability to handle unfamiliar systems in passenger cars according to driver skills. In Agronomy Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1601–1608.Search in Google Scholar

16HUHTAMO, E. 2020. The self-driving car: A media machine for posthumans? Artnodes, no. 26, pp. 1–14. DOI: doi.org/10.7238/a. v0i26.3374Search in Google Scholar

17KROEMER, K. H. E. – GRANDJEAN, E. 1997. Fitting the Task to the Human. 5^th ed., London: CRC Press, 416 pp. eISBN 9780367807337, DOI: doi.org/10.1201/9780367807337Search in Google Scholar

18LARGE, D. R. – CRUNDALL, E. – BURNETT, G. – HARVEY, C. – KONSTANTOPOULOS, P. 2016. Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behavior, performance and opinions of drivers. In Applied Ergonomics, vol. 55, pp. 138–148. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar

19LOGAN, N. S. – RADHAKRISHNAN, H. – CRUICKSHANK, F. E. – ALLEN, P. M. – BANDELA, P. K. – DAVIES, L. N. – HASEBE, S. – KHANAL, S. – SCHMID, K. L. – VERA-DIAZ, F. A. – WOLFFSOHN, J. S. 2021. IMI accommodation and binocular vision in myopia development and progression. In Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 62, no. 5, article no. 4. DOI: doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.5.4Search in Google Scholar

20LOCKHART, T. E. – SHI, W. 2010. Effects of age on dynamic accommodation. In Ergonomics, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 892–903. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2010.489968Search in Google Scholar

21MATEOS-GRANADOS, J. – MARTÍN-DELOSREYES, L. M. – RIVERAIZQUIERDO, M. – JIMÉNEZ-MEJÍAS, E. – MARTÍNEZ-RUIZ, V. – LARDELLI-CLARET, P. 2021. Sex differences in the amount and patterns of car-driving exposure in Spain, 2014 to 2017: An application of a quasi-induced exposure approach. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 24, article no. 13255. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413255Search in Google Scholar

22PAMPEL, S. M. – SOUTHEY, T. J. R. – BURNETT, G. 2020. Understanding the distraction and behavioural adaptations of drivers when experiencing failures of digital side mirrors. In IET Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 775–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0673Search in Google Scholar

23REGAN, M. A. – HORBERRY, T. 2014. Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation. 1^st ed., London: CRC Press, 384 pp. ISBN 9781138077034.Search in Google Scholar

24SCHKREBA, A. – PAMPEL, S. – BURNETT, G. – LARGE, D. R. 2021. Driver perception using a camera-based digital side mirror: An on-road study. In Eds CHARLES, R. – GOLIGHTLY, D. Ergonomics & Human Factors 2021. CIEHF.Search in Google Scholar

25SONY. 2019. RX0 II premium tiny tough camera, DSC-RX0M2, Sony US. Product catalogue. Available at: https://www.sony.cz/electronics/kompaktni-fotoaparaty-cyber-shot/dsc-rx0m2Search in Google Scholar

26SULLIVAN, J. M. 2008. Visual Fatigue and the Driver. Report no. UMTRI-2008-50. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.Search in Google Scholar