[A’ALI, R. – JAFARPOUR, M. – KAZEMI, E. – PESSARAKLI, M. 2017. Effects of raw materials on vermicompost qualities. In Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1635–1643.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAJAL, S. – SUBEDI, S. – BARAL, S. 2019. Utilization of agricultural wastes as substrates for vermicomposting. In IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 79–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAKAR, A. A. – MAHMOOD, N. Z. – ABDULLAH, N. – TAHA, R. M. 2012. Bioconversion of biomass residue from the cultivation of pea sprouts on spent Pleurotus sajor-caju compost employing Lumbricus rubellus. In Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 461–469.]Search in Google Scholar
[BATH, S. A. – SINGH, J. – VIG, A. P. 2017. Earthworms as organic waste managers and biofertilizer producers. In Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1073–1086.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHATELAIN, M. – MATHIEU, J. 2017. How good are epigeic earthworms at dispersing? An investigation to compare epigeic to endogeic and anecic groups. In Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 111, pp. 115–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAUHAN, H. K. – SINGH, K. 2013. Effect of tertiary combinations of animal dung with agrowastes on the growth and development of earthworm Eisenia fetida during organic waste management. In International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, vol. 2, no. 11, 7 pp.10.1186/2251-7715-2-11]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAULAGIN, A. – MAHARJAN, B. – PATHAK, R. – PIYA, S. – CHIMORAYA, S. – SHRESTA, I. – GAUCHAN, D. P. – LAMICHHANE, J. 2017. Effect of feeding materials on yield, quality of vermicompost, multiplication and reproduction of Eisenia foetida. In Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 15–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. 2015. Farmer’s Compost Handbook: Experiences in Latin America. Santiago: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean.]Search in Google Scholar
[GARG, P. – GUPTA, A. – SATYA, S. 2006. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia fetida: A comparative study. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 391–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[GETACHEW, Z. – ADISU, T. – ABEBLE, L. – ANBESSA, B. 2018. Vermicompost potential of common earthworm (Eudrilus eugeniae) and red wiggler (Eisenia fetida) earthworm on the decomposition of various organic wastes. In International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOMEZ-BRANDON, M. – LORES, M. – DOMINGUEZ, J. 2012. Species-specific effects of epigeic earthworms on microbial community structure during first stages of decomposition of organic matter. In PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. e31895.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOUGOULIAS, C. – CLARK, J. M. – SHAW, L. J. 2014. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. In Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2362–2371.]Search in Google Scholar
[HANAFI, F. H. M. – REZANIA, S. – MAT TAIB, S. – MD DIN, M. F. – YAMAUCHI, M. –SAKAMOTO, M. – HARA, H. – PARK, J. – EBRAHIMI, S. S. 2018. Environmentally sustainable applications of agro-based spent mushroom substrate (SMS): an overview. In Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1383–1396.]Search in Google Scholar
[IZYAN, N. N. – JAMALUDIN, A. A. – MAHMOOD, N. Z. 2009. Potential of spent mushroom substrate in vermicomposting. In Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[JAMALUDIN, A. A. – MAMOOD, N. Z. – ABDULLAH, N. 2012. Waste recycling: Feasibility of saw dust based spent mushroom substrate and goat manure in vermicomposting. In Sains Malaysiana, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1445–1450.]Search in Google Scholar
[JORDAN, S. N. – MULLEN, G. J. – MURPHY, M. C. 2008. Composition variability of spent mushroom compost in Ireland. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 411–418.]Search in Google Scholar
[KLOK, C. 2007. Effects of earthworm density on growth, development, and reproduction in Lumbricus rubellus (Hoffm) and possible consequences for the intrinsic rate of population increase. In Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, pp. 2401–2407.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOSTECKA, J. – GARCZYNSKA, M. – PODOLAK, A. – PACZKA, G. – KANIUCZAK, J. 2018. Kitchen organic waste as material for vermiculture and source of nutrients for plants. In Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 267–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOVAČIĆ, D. – KRALIK, D. – JOVIČIĆ, D. – SPAJIĆ, R. 2019. An assessment of anaerobic thermophilic co-digestion of dairy cattle manure and separated tomato greenhouse waste in lab-scale reactors. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 38–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[LIM, S. I. – WU, T. Y. – SIM, E. Y. S. – LIM, P. N. – CLARKE, C. 2012. Biotransformation of rice husk into organic fertilizer through vermicomposting. In Ecological Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 60–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOURDUMARY, A. J. B. – UMA, K. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of earthworm powder (Lampito mauritii). In Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[MANAF, L. A. – JUSOH, M. L. C. – ISMAIL, M. K. Y. T. H. T. – HARUN, R. – JUAHIR, H. 2009. Influences of bedding material in vermicomposting process. In International Journal of Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–91.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUKHERJEE, R. – NANDI, B. 2004. Improvement of in vitro digestibility through biological treatment of water hyacinth biomass by two Pleurotus species. In International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 53, pp. 7–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSYOKA, S. N. – LITI, D. M. – OGELLO, E. – WAIDBACHER, H. 2019. Utilization of the earthworm, Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) as an alternative protein source in fish feeds processing: A review. In Aquaculture Research, vol. 50, pp. 2301–2315.]Search in Google Scholar
[PALSANIA, J. – SHARMA, R. – SRIVASTANA, J. K. – SHARMA, D. 2008. Effect of moisture content variation over kinetic reaction rate during vermicomposting process. In Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 49–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[PARVARESH, A. – MOVAHEDIAN, H. – HAMIDIAN, L. 2004. Vermistabilization of municipal wastewater sludge with Eisenia fetida. In Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 43–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[PRABHA, M. L. – NAGALAKSHMI, N. – PRIYA, M. S. 2015. Analysis of nutrient contents in vermicompost. In European Journal of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[RAMESH, R. – SELVARAJ, Y. – KANNAIYAN, S. 2018. Influence of substrate size on vermicomposting of pre-processed mixed vegetable waste. In International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 5–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROY, S. – BARMAN, S. – CHAKRABORTY, U. – CHAKRABORTY, B. 2015. Evaluation of spent mushroom substrate as biofertilizer for growth improvement of Capsicum annuum L. In Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 22–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROYSE, D. J. 2014. A Global perspective on the high five: Agaricus, Pleurotus, Lentinula, Auricularia and Flammulina. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products (ICMBMP8).]Search in Google Scholar
[SAFDAR, A. H. A. – KOR, N. M. 2014. Vermicompost and vermiculture: structure, benefits and usage. In International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 775–782.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAIKRITHIKA, S. – SANTHIYA, K. R. – GAYATHRI, V. K. 2015. Effects of different substrates on vermicomposting using Eudrilus eugeniae on the growth of Vinca rosea. In International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[SENDI, H. – MOHAMED, M.T.M. – ANWAR, M. P. – SAUD, H. M. 2013. Spent mushroom waste as a media replacement for peat moss in Kai-lan (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) production. In The Scientific World Journal, pp. 1–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIDDIQUE, J. – KAN, A. A. – HUSSAIN, I. – AKHTER, S. 2005. Growth and reproduction of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) in different organic media. In Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 211–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[SINGH, N. B. – KHARE, A. K. – BHARGAVA, D. S. – BHATTACHARYA, S. 2005. Effect of initial substrate pH on vermicomposting using Perionyx excavatus. In Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 85–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[SINHA, R. K. 2009. Earthworms vermicompost: A powerful crop nutrient over the conventional compost and protective soil conditioner against the destructive chemical fertilizers for food safety and security. In Journal of Agricultural and Environment Science, vol. 5, pp. 14–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUPARNO – PRASETYA, B. – TALKAH, A. – SOEMARNO. 2013. The Study of vermicomposting optimization of organic waste. In International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1505–1511.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUTHAR, S. 2009. Vermicomposting of vegetable-market solid waste using Eisenia fetida: Impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and decomposition rate. In Ecological Engineering, vol. 35, pp. 914–920.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUTHAR, S. – GAIROLA, S. 2014. Nutrient recovery from urban forest leaf litter waste solids using Eisenia fetida. In Ecological Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 660–666.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUTHAR, S. – SINGH, S. 2008. Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus). In Journal of Environment Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 99–106.]Search in Google Scholar
[TAJBAKHSH, J. – ABDOLI, M. A. – GOLTAPEH, E. M. – ALAHDADI, I. – MALAKOUTI, M. J. 2008. Recycling of spent mushroom compost using earthworms Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei. In Environmentalist, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 476–482.]Search in Google Scholar
[TRAN, H. 2016. Vermicomposting of spent mushroom compost using Perionyx excavatus and artificial nutrient compound. In International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 101–109.]Search in Google Scholar
[VIDAL, A. – WATTEAU, F. – REMUSAT, L. – MUELLER, C. W. – NGUYEN TU, T. T. – BUEGGER, F. – DERENNE, S. – QUENEA, K. 2019. Earthworm cast formation and development: A shift from plant litter to mineral associated organic matter. In Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 7, no. 55, pp. 1–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[VODOUNNOU, D. S. J. V. – KPOGUE, D. N. S. – TOSSAVI, C. E. – MENNSAH, G. A. –FIOGBE, E. D. 2016. Effect of animal waste and vegetable compost on production and growth of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) during vermiculture. In International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, vol. 5, pp. 87–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZISOPOULOS, F. K. – ramirez, H. A. B. – van der GOOT, A. J. – BOOM, R. M. 2016. A resource efficiency assessment of the industrial mushroom production chain: The influence of data variability. In Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 126, pp. 394–408.]Search in Google Scholar
