1. bookVolume 26 (2020): Issue 1 (February 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
16 Feb 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Traumatic Retroperitoneal Hematoma Complicated with Bone Fractures

Published Online: 22 Apr 2021
Page range: 14 - 18
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
16 Feb 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Objective: Traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) is an underdiagnosed entity, turned to have a high mortality rate, when is not earlier diagnosed. Our aim was to analyze our experiences in patients with traumatic RPH complicated with bone fractures, and highlight the problems in diagnosis and treatment to facilitate the surgeon’s decision.

Methods: In this retrospective study, all cases who presented to the emergency room (ER) and/or admitted to our center with bone fractures complicated with RPH from January 2016 to December 2019 were included (4-years data). Data collected included age, hematoma zones, fracture production mechanisms, mortality, surgical intervention, bones lesions frequency, frequency of pelvic bone injuries, complications and biochemical and hematological analysis (e.g. hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Ht), platelets (PLT), leukocytes (Leu), aspartate aminotransferase level (AST), alanine aminotransferase level (ALT) and creatinine (Cr). All RPHs were diagnosed using computed tomography scan.

Results: A total number of 173 RPH cases with bone fractures were included with a mean age of 48.80±1.40. Zone II and III (lateral and pelvic hematoma) bleed were the most common type of RPH. The main fracture production mechanism was road accident (n=110). The bone lesions frequency besides pelvis, was seen in lumbar vertebral fractures (e.g. 19 cases in 2016, 38 cases in 2017, 45 in 2018 and 40 in 2019), comparing with the other fractures, without any statistical significance. An important significance was seen for frequency of pelvic bone injuries, when comparing 2016 with 2018 year (p=0.040). Furthermore, the complications seem to have a statistical significance when 2016 year was compared with all the other years (p=0.030, p=0.035, p=0.052). Regarding the biochemical and hematological analysis, a statistical significance was seen at Hb (when 2016 was compared with 2017 year, p=0.007 and 2018 year, p=0.001), Ht (when 2016 was compared with 2017, p=0.054 and 2018, p=0.002), PLT (when 2016 was compared with 2018 year, p=0.0004, and 2019 year, p=0.002) and ALT (when 2016 was compared with 2017 year, p=0.026, and 2018 year, p=0.026). The highest mortality was registered in 2019 (n=11), being statistically significant in comparison with 2016 year (p=0.030). About 109 patients were treated conservatively, and 64 by surgical interventions.

Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence for the best management in RPH, conservative approaching being reserved only for patients who are stable. Therefore, traumatic RPH complicated with bone fractures, especially lumbar vertebral fractures, represent a life-threatening condition, early diagnosis and correct treatment is of upmost importance.

Keywords

1. Feliciano DV. Management of traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma. Ann Surg 1990, 211(2), 109-23.Search in Google Scholar

2. El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Al-Thani H, Zarour A, Parchani A, Peralta R, et al. Compartmental anatomical classification of traumatic abdominal injuries from the academic point of view and its potential clinical implication. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014;8:14.Search in Google Scholar

3. Martin RS, Meredith JW. Gastrointestinal tract injury management of acute trauma. Essential Surgical Procedures. In: Townsend CM, editor. Sabiston textbook of surgery. 19 ed. Philadelphia: Saundeers; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Van Holsbeeck B, Baekelandt M. Diagnosis and treatment of expanding haematoma of the lateral abdominal wall after blunt abdominal trauma. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(8):1553-5.Search in Google Scholar

5. Synevo Laboratory. Specific references of the work technology used. 2010.Search in Google Scholar

6. Selivanov V, Chi HS, Alverdy JC, Morris JA, Jr., Sheldon GF. Mortality in retroperitoneal hematoma. J Trauma. 1984 Dec;24(12):1022-7.Search in Google Scholar

7. Muftuoglu M, Topaloglu U, Aktekin A, Odabasi M, Ates M, Saglam A. The management of retroperitoneal hematomas. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2004;12:152-6.Search in Google Scholar

8. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Vassiliu P, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Hanks SH, et al. A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of angiographic embolization for pelvic and visceral injuries. J Trauma. 2002 Aug;53(2):303-8; discussion 8.Search in Google Scholar

9. Daly KP, Ho CP, Persson DL, Gay SB. Traumatic Retroperitoneal Injuries: Review of Multidetector CT Findings. Radiographics. 2008 Oct;28(6):1571-90.Search in Google Scholar

10. Killeen KL, DeMeo JH, Cole TJ. Computed tomography of traumatic and nontraumatic retroperitoneal emergencies. Emergency Radiology. 1999 1999/09/01;6(4):232-43.Search in Google Scholar

11. Abdullah M, Al-Salamah SM. Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma in blunt trauma. Saudi Med J. 2010 Nov;31(11):1232-7.Search in Google Scholar

12. Henao F, Aldrete JS. Retroperitoneal hematomas of traumatic origin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Aug;161(2):106-16.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nakao S, Ishikawa K, Ono H, Kusakabe K, Fujimura I, Ueno M, et al. Radiological classification of retroperitoneal hematoma resulting from lumbar vertebral fracture. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):353-63Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang F, Wang F. The diagnosis and treatment of traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(2):573-6Search in Google Scholar

15. Purghel F, Jemna C, Ciuvica R. [Retroperitoneal hematoma in pelvic fractures]. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011 Jan-Feb;106(1):23-31.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo