Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Artificial Satellites
Volume 58 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
Open Access
Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds
Viktor Szabó
Viktor Szabó
and
Katarzyna Osińska-Skotak
Katarzyna Osińska-Skotak
| Jul 18, 2023
Artificial Satellites
Volume 58 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jul 18, 2023
Page range:
63 - 87
Received:
Mar 22, 2023
Accepted:
Jun 16, 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2023-0006
Keywords
GRACE
,
AMSR-E
,
total water storage anomalies
,
soil moisture
,
remote sensors
© 2023 Viktor Szabó et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Land cover data of forest land (a), oxygen availability to roots (b), total cultivated land (c), and share of build-up land (d) based on Harmonized World Soil Database
Figure 2.
Seasonal patterns of ΔTWS (a), SM from band X (b), and SM from band C (c) grouped by month over time
Figure 3.
Average SM from AMSR-E and ΔTWS from GRACE grouped by latitude (a) and longitude (b)
Figure 4.
GRACE (a,b) and AMSR-E (c,d,e,f) average anomaly (a,c,e) and standard deviation (b,d,f) grouped by latitude over time
Figure 5.
GRACE ΔTWS (a,d,g,j) and AMSR-E band C (b,e,h,k) and band X (c,f,i,l) SM averaged and normalized values grouped by seasons DJF (a,b,c), MAM (g,h,i), JJA (j,k,l) and SON (j,k,l)
Figure 6.
Pearson correlation coefficient between SM from band X and C from AMSR-E (a), ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band C from AMSR-E (b), ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band X from AMSR-E (c)
Figure 7.
Dominant spatial pattern of water variability presended by decomposition of signal using EOF for ΔTWS from GRACE (a,d,g) and SM from AMSR-E (b,c,e,f,h,j). The first spatial pattern (EOF1) (a,b,c), the second spatial pattern (EOF2) (d,e,f), and the third spatial pattern (EOF3) (g,h,j)
Figure 8.
EOF signal amplitude for ΔTWS form GRACE (a), SM from band X from AMSR-E (b), and SM from band C from AMSR-E (c)
Figure 9.
EOF signal phase shift for ΔTWS form GRACE (a), SM from band X from AMSR-E (b), and SM from band C from AMSR-E (c)
Figure 10.
Pearson correlation over selected rivers basin between ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band X from AMSR-E (a) and ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band C from AMSR-E (b)
Figure 11.
Cross-correlation over selected rivers basin between ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band X from AMSR-E (a) and ΔTWS from GRACE and SM from band C from AMSR-E (b)
Figure 12.
River basin time series containing ΔTWS and SM (a,c,e,g,i,k,m,o,q,s,u,w), TWSA and SMA (b,d,f,h,j,l,n,p,r,t,v,x) for European (a,b,c,d), North America (e,f,g,h), South America (i,j,k,l), Asian (m,n,o,p), African (q,r,s,t,w,x), and Australian (u,v) rivers
Preview