The validity of transverse intermaxillary analysis by traditional PA cephalometry compared with cone-beam computed tomography

1 Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66. Search in Google Scholar

2 Hans M, Valiathan M, Palomo J. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: a link with the past, a promise for the future. Semin Orthod. 2011;17:81-7. Search in Google Scholar

3 Athanasiou AE, van der Meij AJW. Posteroanterior (frontal) cephalometry. In: Athanasiou, AE(ed): Orthodontic Cephalometry. Mosby-Wolfe. London. 1995:141-161. Search in Google Scholar

4 Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures: Part 1, results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42:625-40. Search in Google Scholar

5 Betts NJ, Vanarsdall R, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10:75-96. Search in Google Scholar

6 Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Caltabiano M. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008;78:761-5. Search in Google Scholar

7 Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:15-21. Search in Google Scholar

8 Ghafari J, Cater PE, Shofer FS. Effect of film-object distance on posteroanterior cephalometric measurements: suggestions for standardized cephalometric methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:30-7. Search in Google Scholar

9 Pirttiniemi P, Miettinen J, Kantomaa T. Combined effects of error in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:629-36. Search in Google Scholar

10 Yoon Y, Kim D, Yu P, Kim H, Choi E, Kim K. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 2002;72:36-42. Search in Google Scholar

11 van Vlijmen O, Bergé S, Bronckhorst E, Swennen G, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone-beam CT and conventional frontal radiographs from human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:773-8. Search in Google Scholar

12 Major P, Johnson D, Hesse K, Glover K. Landmark identication error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994:447-454. Search in Google Scholar

13 Scarfe W, Farman A. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-30. Search in Google Scholar

14 Mah J, Huang J, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in Orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:Suppl. 3.7s-13s. Search in Google Scholar

15 Betts N, Lisenby W. Normal adult transverse jaw values obtained using standardized posteroanterior cephalometrics.(Abstract). J Dent Res 1994;73:298. Search in Google Scholar

16 Betts N, Sturtz D, Aldrich D. Treatment of transverse (width) discrepancies in patients who require isolated mandibular surgery: the case for maxillary expansion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:361-4. Search in Google Scholar

17 Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazäo DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi F. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26-35. Search in Google Scholar

18 Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17.e1-17.e9. Search in Google Scholar

19 Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;19:228-31. Search in Google Scholar

20 Lascala C, Panella J, Marques M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4. Search in Google Scholar

21 Stratemann S, Huang J, Maki K, Miller A, Hatcher D. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93. Search in Google Scholar

22 Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater J, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomograph-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:e1-16.e6. Search in Google Scholar

23 Ozsoy U, Demirel B, Yildirim F, Tosun O, Sarikcioglu L. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:285-90. Search in Google Scholar

24 Legrell P, Nyquist H, Isberg A. Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2000;70:157-64. Search in Google Scholar

25 Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang J, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller A. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomgraph scans. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:263-75. Search in Google Scholar

26 Periago D, Scarfe W, Moshiri M, Scheetz J, Silveira A, Farman A. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone Beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008;78:387-95. Search in Google Scholar

27 Baumrind S, Frantz R. The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:505-517. Search in Google Scholar

28 El-Mangoury N, Shaheen S, Mostafa Y. Landmark identification in computerized posteroanterior cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:57-61. Search in Google Scholar

29 Wong R, Chau A, Hägg U. 3D CBCT McNamara’s cephalometric analysis in an adult southern Chinese popluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:920-5. Search in Google Scholar

30 Stratemann S, Huang J, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller A. Evaluating the human mandible with cone beam computed tomgraphy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:(Suppl.)S58-570. Search in Google Scholar

31 Kapila S, Conley R, Harrell Jr W. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:24-34. Search in Google Scholar

32 Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1972;61:1-28. Search in Google Scholar

33 Athanasiou AE, DroschI H, Bosch C. Data and patterns of transverse dentofacial structure of 6-to-15-year old children: a posterioranterior cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:465-71. Search in Google Scholar

34 Cortella S, Shofer F, Ghafari J. Transverse development of the jaws: norms for the posteroanterior cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:519-22. Search in Google Scholar

35 Kau C, Richmond S, Palomo J, Hans M. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomgraphy in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-93. Search in Google Scholar

36 Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin O, Küçük M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomgoraphy. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1812-16. Search in Google Scholar

37 Deguchi T, Katashiba S, Inami T, Foong K, Huak C. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomgraphy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:218-22. Search in Google Scholar

38 Nair R, Deguchi T, Li X, Katashiba S, Chan Y. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal class II pattern. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:9-13. Search in Google Scholar

39 Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E, Yao CC, Chen MH, Chen YJ. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e289-97. Search in Google Scholar

40 Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9. Search in Google Scholar

41 Kumar V, Ludlow J, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:263-9. Search in Google Scholar

42 The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:899-902. Search in Google Scholar