This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262–73.Search in Google Scholar
Berger J, Byloff FK. The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:304–8.Search in Google Scholar
Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency, Clin Orthod Res 2001; 4:220–7.Search in Google Scholar
Eberting JJ, Straja SP, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228–34.Search in Google Scholar
Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:472–80.Search in Google Scholar
Harradine NW, Birnie DJ. The clinical use of Activa self-ligating brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109: 319–28.Search in Google Scholar
Harradine N. The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Seminars in Orthod 2008;14:5–18.Search in Google Scholar
Alpern MC. Gaining control with self-ligation. Seminars in Orthod 2008;14:73–86.Search in Google Scholar
Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Lee RT. Self-ligating appliances: evolution or revolution? Aust Orthod J 2008;24:41–9.Search in Google Scholar
Maijer R, Smith DC. Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:29–31.Search in Google Scholar
Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:208–15.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 2006;76:480–5.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG. SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Aust Orthod J 2005; 21:123–7.Search in Google Scholar
Miles PG. Self-ligating versus conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:223–5.Search in Google Scholar
Haeger RS, Colberg RT. Effects of missed appointments and bracket failures on treatment efficiency and office productivity. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:433–7.Search in Google Scholar
Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:230–8.Search in Google Scholar
Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). J Orthod 2000; 27:149–62.Search in Google Scholar
Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ Jr, Cobb CM, Tira DE. An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:439–47.Search in Google Scholar
Alger DW. Appointment frequency versus treatment time, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:436–9.Search in Google Scholar
Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in-vivo study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:119–22.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor PJS, Kerr WJS, McColl JH. Factors associated with the standard and duration of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1996; 23:335–41.Search in Google Scholar
Onyeaso CO, Begole EA. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:248–52.Search in Google Scholar
Templeton KM, Powell R, Moore MB, Williams AC, Sandy JR. Are the Peer Assessment Rating and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes? Eur J Orthod 2006;28: 462–6.Search in Google Scholar
Fox NA, Daniels C, Gilgrass T. A comparison of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). Br Dent J 2002;193:225–30.Search in Google Scholar
