Cite

Amorim E. A. M., Graham J. K., Spizziri B., Meyers M., Torres C. A. A. (2009). Effect of cholesterol or cholesteryl conjugates on cryosurvival of bull sperm. Cryobiology, 58: 210–214.Search in Google Scholar

Ansari M. S., Rakha B. A., Andrabi S. M. H., Ullah N., Iqbal R., Holt W. V., Akhter S. (2012). Glutathione-supplemented tris-citric acid extender improves the post-thaw quality and in vivo fertility of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) bull spermatozoa. Reprod. Biol., 12: 271–276.Search in Google Scholar

Bogliolo L., Ariu F., Uccheddu S., Strina A., Rosati I., Zedda M. T., Ledda S. (2010). High hydrostatic pressure treatment improves the quality of in vitro produced ovine blastocysts. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 22: 202.Search in Google Scholar

Bryła M., Trzcińska M. (2020). Potential use of a high hydrostatic pressure chamber for cryopreservation of boar semen (in Polish). Prz. Hod., 2: 5–7.Search in Google Scholar

Du Y., Pribenszky C., Molnár M., Zhang X., Yang H., Kuwayama M., Pedersen A. M., Villemoes K., Bolund L., Vajta G. (2008). High hydrostatic pressure: a new way to improve in vitro developmental competence of porcine matured oocytes after vitrification. Reproduction, 135: 13–17.Search in Google Scholar

Holt W. V. (2000). Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology, 53: 47–58.Search in Google Scholar

Horváth A., Szenci O., Nagy K., Végh L., Pribenszky C. (2016). Stress preconditioning of semen before cryopreservation improves fertility and increases the number of offspring born: a prospective randomised study using a porcine model. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 28: 475–481.Search in Google Scholar

Huang S. Y., Pribenszky C., Kuo Y. H., Teng S. H., Chen Y. H., Chung M. T., Chiu Y. F. (2009). Hydrostatic pressure affects the protein profile of boar sperm before and after freezingthawing. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 112: 136–149.Search in Google Scholar

Kaka A., Wahid H., Rosnina Y., Yimer N., Khumran A. M., Behan A. A., Kaka U., Ebrahimi M. (2015 a). Alpha-linolenic acid supplementation in Tris extender can improve frozen- thawed bull semen quality. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 50: 29–33.10.1111/rda.1244525366298Search in Google Scholar

Kaka A., Wahid H., Rosnina Y., Yimer N., Khumran A. M., Sarsaifi K., Behan A. A., Kaka U., Ebrahimi M. (2015 b). α-Linolenic acid supplementation in BioXcell® extender can improve the quality of post-cooling and frozen-thawed bovine sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 153: 1–7.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.12.00125544152Search in Google Scholar

Kültz D. (2003). Evolution of the cellular stress proteome: from monophyletic origin to ubiquitous function. J. Exp. Biol., 206: 3119–3124.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo Y. H., Pribenszky C., Huang S.Y., (2008). Higher litter size is achieved by the insemination of high hydrostatic pressure-treated frozen-thawed boar semen. Theriogenology, 70: 1395.Search in Google Scholar

Layek S. S., Mohanty T. K., Kumaresan A., Parks J. E. (2016). Cryopreservation of bull semen: Evolution from egg yolk based to soybean based extenders. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 172: 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Moraes E. A., Graham J. K., Torres C. A. A., Meyers M., Spizziri B. (2010). Delivering cholesterol or cholestanol to bull sperm membranes improves cryosurvival. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 118: 148–154.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy E. M., Kelly A. K., O ’ Meara C., Eivers B., Lonergan P., Fair S. (2018). Influence of bull age, ejaculate number, and season of collection on semen production and sperm motility parameters in Holstein Friesian bulls in a commercial artificial insemination centre. J. Anim. Sci., 96: 2408–2418.Search in Google Scholar

Pribenszky C., Molnár M., Cseh S., Solti L. (2005). Improving post-thaw survival of cryopreserved mouse blastocysts by hydrostatic pressure challenge. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 87: 143–150.Search in Google Scholar

Pribenszky C., Molnár M., Horváth A., Harnos A., Szenci O. (2006). Hydrostatic pressure induced increase in post-thaw motility of frozen boar spermatozoa. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 18: 162–163.Search in Google Scholar

Pribenszky C., Molnár M., Horváth A., Kútvölgyi G., Harnos A., Szenci O., Dengg J., Lederer J. (2007). Improved post-thaw motility, viability and fertility are achieved by hydrostatic pressure treated bull semen. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 19: 181–182.Search in Google Scholar

Pribenszky C., Du Y., Molnár M., Harnos A., Vajta G. (2008). Increased stress tolerance of pig oocytes after high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 106: 200–207.Search in Google Scholar

Pribenszky C., Vajta G., Molnar M., Du Y., Lin L., Bolund L., Yovich J. (2010). Stress for stress tolerance? A fundamentally new approach in mammalian embryology. Biol. Reprod., 83: 690–697.Search in Google Scholar

Pukazhenthi B., Noiles E., Pelican K., Donoghue A., Wildt D., Howard J. (2000). Osmotic effects on feline spermatozoa from normospermic versus teratospermic donors. Cryobiology, 40: 139–150.Search in Google Scholar

Ramón M., Pérez-Guzmán M. D., Jiménez-Rabadán P., Esteso M. C., García-Álvarez O., Maroto-Morales A., Anel-López L., Soler A. J., Fernández-Santos M. R., Garde J. J. (2013). Sperm cell population dynamics in ram semen during the cryopreservation process. PLoS One, 8(3): e59189.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Martínez H., Peña Vega F. (2013). Semen technologies in domestic animal species. Anim. Front., 3: 26–33.Search in Google Scholar

Szczęśniak-Fabiańczyk B., Bochenek M., Gogol P., Smorąg Z. (2020). Modified cryopreservation of semen of young bulls with reduced freezability (in Polish). Med. Weter., 76: 423–428.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi T., Itoh R., Nishinomiya H., Katoh M., Manabe N. (2012). Effect of linoleic acid albumin in a dilution solution and long-term equilibration for freezing of bovine spermatozoa with poor freezability. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 47: 92–97.Search in Google Scholar

Taşdemira U., Büyükleblebici S., Tuncer P. B., Coşkunc E., Özgürtaşd T., Aydind F. N., Büyükleblebici O., Gürcane I. S. (2013). Effects of various cryoprotectants on bull sperm quality, DNA integrity and oxidative stress parameters. Cryobiology, 66: 38–42.Search in Google Scholar

Thurston L. M., Watson P. F., Holt W. V. (2002). Sperm cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation. Cryo Letters, 23: 255–262.Search in Google Scholar

Tuncer P. B., Bucak M. N., Büyükleblebici S., Sariözkan S., Yeni D., Eken A., Akalin P. P., Kinet H., Avdatek F., Fidan A. F., Gündoğan M. (2010). The effect of cysteine and glutathione on sperm and oxidative stress parameters of post-thawed bull semen. Cryobiology, 61: 303–307.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2300-8733
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Biotechnology, Zoology, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine