[Abijaoude J.A., Morand-Fehr P., Tessier J., Schmidely P.H., Sauvant D. (2000). Diet effect on the daily feeding behavior, frequency and characteristics of meals in dairy goats. Livest. Prod. Sci., 64: 29–37.10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00173-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Andersen I.L., Bøe K.E. (2007). Resting pattern and social interactions in goats – the impact of size and organisation of lying space. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 108: 89–103.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Aschwanden J., Gygax L., Wechsler B., Keil N.M. (2009). Loose housing of small goat groups: Influence of visual cover and elevated levels on feeding, resting and agonistic behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119: 171–179.10.1016/j.applanim.2009.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Averós X., Lorea A., de Heredia I.B., Arranz J., Ruiz R. (2014). Space availability in confined sheep during pregnancy, effects in movement patterns and use of space. PLoS One, 9: e94767; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094767.10.1371/journal.pone.0094767398621624733027]Search in Google Scholar
[Barroso F.G., Alados C.L., Boza J. (2000). Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 69: 35–53.10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00113-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bøe K.E., Berg S., Andersen I.L. (2006). Resting behavior and displacements in ewes – effects of reduced lying space and pen shape. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98: 249–259.10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Conway M.L.T., Blackshaw J.K., Daniel R.C.W. (1996). The effects of agonistic behavior and nutritional stress on both the success of pregnancy and various plasma constituents in Angora goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 48: 1–13.10.1016/0168-1591(95)01024-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook N.B. (2019). Optimizing resting behavior in lactating dairy cows through freestall design. Veterinary Clinics of North America – Food Animal Practice, 35: 93–109; 10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.10.005.10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Corkum M.J., Bate L.A., Tennessen T., Lirette A. (1994). Consequences of reduction of number of individual feeders on feeding behavior and stress level of feedlot steers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 41: 27–35.10.1016/0168-1591(94)90049-3]Search in Google Scholar
[De Vries T.J., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2004). Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behaviour of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 1432–1438.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73293-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Ehrlenbruch R., Jørgensen G.H.M., Andersen I.L., Bøe K.E. (2010). Provision of additional walls in the resting area – the effects on resting behavior and social interactions in goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 122: 35–40.10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferris C.P., Patterson D.C., Mayne C.S., O ’Connell N.E. (2013). Effect of feed space allowance and period of access to food on dairy cow performance. Grass and Forage Sci., 70; 59–70.10.1111/gfs.12098]Search in Google Scholar
[Fregonesi H.A., Leaver J.D. (2002). Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behavior, performance and health of dairy cows housed in straw yard and cubicle systems. Livest. Prod. Sci., 78: 245–257.10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Fregonesi J.A., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M. (2007). Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 3349–3354.10.3168/jds.2006-794]Search in Google Scholar
[Harb M.Y., Vivien S.R., Campling R.C. (1985). Eating behaviour, social dominance and voluntary intake of silage in group-fed milking cattle. Grass and Forage Sci., 40: 113–118.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1985.tb01727.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen G.H.M., Andersen I.L., Bøe K.E. (2007). Feed intake and social interactions in dairy goats – the effects of feeding space and type of roughage. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107: 239–251.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczel P., Lee A. (2019). Lying time and its importance to the dairy cow impact of stocking density and time budget stresses. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract., 35: 47–60.10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Lamprecht J. (1986). Structure and causation of the dominance hierarchy in a flock of bar-headed geese (Anser indicus). Behavior, 96: 28–48.10.1163/156853986X00207]Search in Google Scholar
[Loretz C., Wechsler B., Hauser R., Rüsch P. (2004). A comparison of space requirements of horned and hornless goats at the feed barrier and in the lying area. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 87: 275–283.10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Mirandadela Lama G.C., Mattiello S. (2010). The importance of social behavior for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rumin. Res., 90: 1–10.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen B.L., de Jong I.C., De Vries T.J. (2016). The use of feeding behaviour in the assessment of animal welfare. In: Nutrition and the Welfare of Farm Animals, Phillips C. (ed.). Animal Welfare, vol 16. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-27356-3_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Pascual-Alonso M., María G.A., Sepúlveda W.S., Villarroel M., Aguayo-Ulloa L., Galindo F., Mirandadela Lama G.C. (2013). Identity profiles based on social strategies, morphology, physiology, and cognitive abilities in goats. J. Vet. Behav., 8: 458–465.10.1016/j.jveb.2013.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasmussen D.K., Weber R., Wechsler B. (2006). Effects of animal/feeding-place ratio on the behaviour and performance of fattening pigs fed via sensor-controlled liquid feeding. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98: 45–53.10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS Institute Inc., (2014). SAS OnlineDoc® Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tölü C., Savaş T., Pala A., Thomsen H. (2007). Effects of goat social rank on kid gender. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52: 77–82.10.17221/2235-CJAS]Search in Google Scholar
[Vas J., Chojnacki R., Kjøren M.F., Lyngwa C., Andersen I.L. (2013). Social interactions, cortisol and reproductive success of domestic goats (Capra hircus) subjected to different animal densities during pregnancy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 147: 117–126.10.1016/j.applanim.2013.04.009]Search in Google Scholar