1. bookVolume 19 (2019): Issue 3 (July 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

An Optimized Method of RNA Isolation from Goat Milk Somatic Cells for Transcriptomic Analysis

Published Online: 30 Jul 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 19 (2019) - Issue 3 (July 2019)
Page range: 605 - 617
Received: 14 Oct 2018
Accepted: 19 Mar 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The goat (Capra hircus) is a perfect animal model for analyzing the transcriptome of milk somatic cells (MSCs), as sufficient numbers of somatic cells in goat milk, i.e., exfoliated epithelial cells, can be obtained using noninvasive methods. RNA integrity and purity are the first and most important parameters qualifying samples for transcriptomic tests and next-generation sequencing, as RNA quality influences experimental results. The aim of this study was to optimize a method for obtaining high-quality RNA from goat MSCs, irrespective of effects like breed, lactation stage, health status (e.g., with or without small ruminant lentivirus [SRLV] infection), or number of somatic cells. Milk samples were obtained from goats of two Polish breeds in various lactation stages and in different parities, and from goats infected and not infected with SRLV. Altogether, 412 MSC samples were examined: 206 using method A with fenozol and 206 using method B with QIAzol. Though the overall purity (measured as absorbance ratios at 260 nm/280 nm and 260 nm/230 nm) of the RNA material was comparable, the average yield of RNA isolated using method A was 11.9 µg, while method B’s average yield was 29.9 µg. Moreover, method B resulted in good quality RNA suitable for transcriptome analysis. Results were confirmed by RT-qPCR, using 18S rRNA and RPLP0 as the reference genes. The application of our modified treatment method was successful in obtaining high-integrity samples for transcriptomic or next-generation sequencing analysis. Using a 400 mL milk sample cooled in ice directly after milking, securing the cooling chain process from milking to MSC isolation, and applying method B to isolate RNA, we obtained good RNA quality irrespective of the goats’ breed, lactation stage, parity, milk yield, SRLV infection, and even milk yield and number of somatic cells in milk.

Keywords

Badrul H.Y., McLachlan G., Vrettou C., Collie D. (2011). Optimising the quality and integrity of RNA samples from bronchial air way tissues. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol., 19: 19–27.Search in Google Scholar

Bagnicka E., Winnicka A., Jóźwik A., Rzewuska M., Strzałkowska N., Kościuczuk E., Prusak B., Kaba J., Horbańczuk J.O., Krzyżewski J. (2011). Relationship between somatic cell count and bacterial pathogens in goat milk. Small Rumin. Res., 100: 72–77.Search in Google Scholar

Ben Chedly H., Boutinaud M., Bernier-Dodier P., Marnet P.G., Lacasse P. (2010). Disruption of cell junctions induces apoptosis and reduces synthetic activity in lactating goat mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 2938–2951.Search in Google Scholar

Ben Chedly H., Lacasse P., Marnet P., Komara M., Marion S., Boutinaud M. (2011). Use of milk epithelial cells to study regulation of cell activity and apoptosis during once-daily milking in goats. Animal, 5: 572–579.Search in Google Scholar

Boutinaud M., Jammes H. (2002). Potential uses of milk epithelial cells: a review. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 42: 133–147.Search in Google Scholar

Boutinaud M., Rulquin H., Keisler D.H., Djiane J., Jammes H. (2002). Use of somatic cells from goat milk for dynamic studies of gene expression in the mammary gland. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 1258–1269.Search in Google Scholar

Boutinaud M., Galio L., Lollivier V., Finot L., Wiart S., Esquerré D., Devinoy E. (2013). Unilateral once daily milking locally induces differential gene expression in both mammary tissue and milk epithelial cells revealing mammary remodeling. Physiol. Genomics, 45: 973–985.Search in Google Scholar

Brenaut P., Lefèvre L., Rau A., Laloë D., Pisoni G., Moroni P., Bevilacqua C., Martin P. (2014). Contribution of mammary epithelial cells to the immune response during early stages of a bacterial infection to Staphylococcus aureus. Vet. Res., 45: 16.Search in Google Scholar

Brown R., Epis M.R., Horsham J.L., Kabir T.D., Richardson K.L., Leedman P.J. (2018). Total RNA extraction from tissues for microRNA and target gene expression analysis: not all kits are created equal. BMC Biotechnol., 18: 16.Search in Google Scholar

Capuco A.V., Wood D.L., Baldwin R., McLeod K., Paape M.J. (2001). Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2177–2187.Search in Google Scholar

Cicinnati V.R., Shen Q., Sotiropoulos G.C., Radtke A., Gerken G., Beckebaum S. (2008). Validation of putative reference genes for gene expression studies in human hepatocellular carcinoma using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. BMC Cancer, 8: 350.Search in Google Scholar

Cieslak J., Mackowski M., Czyzak-Runowska G., Wojtowski J., Puppel K., Kuczynska B., Pawlak P. (2015). Screening for the most suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in equine milk somatic cells. PLoS ONE, 10(10): e0139688.Search in Google Scholar

Coombes B.K., Hardwidge P.R., Finlay B.B. (2004). Interpreting the host-pathogen dialogue through microarrays. Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 54: 291–331.Search in Google Scholar

Dalaly B.K., Eitenmiller R.R., Friend B.A., Shahani K.M. (1980). Human milk ribonuclease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 65: 381–391.Search in Google Scholar

Dastgheib S., Irajie C., Assaei R., Koohpeima F., Mokarram P. (2014). Optimization of RNA extraction from rat pancreatic tissue. Iran. J. Med. Sci., 39: 282–288.Search in Google Scholar

Dudemaine P.L., Fomenky B., Dutoit A., Béjanin L., Ibeagha-Awemu E.M. (2017). 341 Comparison of five commercial kits for total RNA isolation including microRNA from three bovine milk fractions. J. Anim. Sci., 95: 168–169.Search in Google Scholar

Finot L., Marnet P.G., Dessauge F. (2011). Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR normalization: application in the caprine mammary gland. Small Rumin. Res., 95: 20–26.Search in Google Scholar

Fleige S., Pfafl M.W. (2006). RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Mol. Aspects Med., 27: 126–139.Search in Google Scholar

Fordyce S.L., Kampmann M.-L., van Doorn N.L., Gilbert M.T.P. (2013). Long-term RNA persistence in postmortem contexts. Investig. Genet., 4: 7.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego Romero I., Pai A.A., Tung J., Gilad Y. (2014). RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification. BMC Biol., 12: 42.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta N., Mathur M.P. (1989). Level and distribution of ribonuclease in milk from different species. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 42: 547–549.Search in Google Scholar

Kolijn K., Geert J.L., van Leenders H. (2016). Comparison of RNA extraction kits and histological stains for laser capture microdissected prostate tissue. BMC Res. Not., 9: 7.Search in Google Scholar

Kowalski M. (2009). Standard of dairy goats’ feeding. In: NRIAP-INRA, Standard of ruminants’ feeding: nutrient value of French and domestic fodders for ruminants, Strzelecki (ed.) (in Polish). National Research Institute of Animal Production, Kraków, Poland, pp. 109–119.Search in Google Scholar

Kuang J., Yan X., Genders A.J., Granata C., Bishop D.J. (2018). An overview of technical considerations when using quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in human exercise research. PLoS ONE, 13(5): e0196438.Search in Google Scholar

Li R., Richoux N., Boutinaud M., Martin P., Gagnaire V. (2014). Role of somatic cells on dairy processes and products: a review. Dairy Sci. Technol., 94: 517–538.Search in Google Scholar

Li R., Dudemaine P.L., Zhao X., Lei C., Ibeagha-Awemu E.M. (2016). Comparative analysis of the miRNome of bovine milk fat, whey and cells. PloS One, 11(4): e0154129.Search in Google Scholar

Livak K.J, Schmittgen T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2∆∆C(T) method. Methods, 25: 402–408.Search in Google Scholar

Majewska A., Domoradzki T., Grzelkowska-Kowalczyk K. (2019). Transcriptomic profiling during myogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol., 1889: 127–168.Search in Google Scholar

Narrandes S., Xu W. (2018). Gene expression detection assay for cancer clinical use. J. Cancer, 9: 2249–2265.Search in Google Scholar

Norollahi S.A., Kokhaee P., Rashidy-Pour A., Hojati V., Norollahi S.E., Larijani L.V., Samadan A.A. (2018). Comparison of methods of RNA extraction from breast and gastric cancer tissues. Crescent J. Med. Biol. Sci., 5: 25–28.Search in Google Scholar

Peirson S.N, Butler J.N. (2007). RNA extraction from mammalian tissues. Methods Mol. Biol., 362: 315–327.Search in Google Scholar

Pławińska-Czarnak J., Bagnicka E., Kaba J., Bogdan J., Zarzyńska J. (2014). Analysis of the CAEV infection impact on the milk yield and milk SCC of Polish dairy goats. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Food Sci., 3: 39–42.Search in Google Scholar

Pławińska-Czarnak J., Zarzyńska J., Majewska A., Jank M., Kaba J., Bogdan J., Anusz K., Bagnicka E. (2019). Selected tissues of two Polish goat breeds do not differ on genomic level. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 37: 53–64.Search in Google Scholar

Reiman M., Laan M., Rull K., Sõber S. (2017). Effects of RNA integrity on transcript quantification by total RNA sequencing of clinically collected human placental samples. FASEB J., 31: 3298–3308.Search in Google Scholar

Reisberg S., Krebs K., Lepamets M., Kals M., Mägi R., Metsalu K., Lauschke V.M., Vilo J., Milani L. (2018). Translating genotype data of 44,000 biobank participants into clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations: challenges and solutions. Genet. Med., 21: 1345–1354.Search in Google Scholar

Samadani A.A., Nikbakhsh N., Fattahi S., Pourbagher R., Aghajanpour Mir S.M., Mousavi Kani N., Abedian Z., Akhavan-Niaki H. (2015). RNA extraction from animal and human's cancerous tissues: does tissue matter? Int. J. Mol. Cel. Med., 4: 54–59.Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Macias D., Castro N., Moreno-Indias I., Morales-dela Nuez A., Briggs H., Capote J., Argüello A. (2010). The effects of storage temperature on goat milk somatic cell count using the DeLaval counter. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 1317–1320.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder A., Mueller O., Stocker S., Salowsky R., Leiber M., Gassmann M., Lightfoot S., Menzel W., Granzow M., Ragg T. (2006). The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol. Biol., 7: 3.Search in Google Scholar

Sellin Jeffries M.K., Kiss A.J., Smith A.W., Oris J.T. (2014). A comparison of commercially-available automated and manual extraction kits for the isolation of total RNA from small tissue samples. BMC Biotechnol., 14: 94.Search in Google Scholar

Suárez-Vega A., Gutiérrez-Gil B., Klopp C., Robert-Granie C., Tosser-Klopp G., Arranz J.J. (2015). Characterization and comparative analysis of the milk transcriptome in two dairy sheep breeds using RNA sequencing. Sci. Rep., 5: 18399.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson K.L., Pine P.S., Rosenzweig B.A., Turpaz Y., Retief J. (2007). Characterization of the effect of sample quality on high density oligonucleotide microarray data using progressively degraded rat liver RNA. BMC Biotechnol., 7: 57.Search in Google Scholar

Toral P.G., Hervás G., Suárez-Vega A., Arranz J.J., Frutos P. (2016). Isolation of RNA from milk somatic cells as an alternative to biopsies of mammary tissue for nutrigenomic studies in dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 8461–8471.Search in Google Scholar

Wickramasinghe S., Rincon G., Islas-Trejo A., Medrano J.F. (2012). Transcriptional profiling of bovine milk using RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics, 13: 45.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo