1. bookVolume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (May 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Effect of the Type of Alternative Housing System, Genotype and Age of Laying Hens on Egg Quality

Published Online: 11 May 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2018) - Issue 2 (May 2018)
Page range: 541 - 556
Received: 26 Sep 2017
Accepted: 10 Jan 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of the type of alternative housing system, and genotype and age of laying hens on physical traits of egg shell and contents. It was demonstrated that alternative housing system type influenced egg weight and shape, and eggshell color and yolk color intensity. Eggs from free-range system were heavier and were characterized by more intense yolk color. No effect of alternative housing system type on albumen height, value of Haugh units (HU value) and presence of meat and blood spots was noted. Hen genotype had a significant effect on egg weight and eggshell color intensity in each of the alternative housing systems tested in this study. Hy-line Brown hens laid heavier eggs than hens of native breeds. Genotype was also observed to affect egg content traits (albumen height, HU values and presence of meat and blood spots). Independently of the type of alternative housing system, most blood and meat spots were noted in eggs of hens laying brown-shelled eggs, i.e. R-11 and Hy-line Brown layers. Laying hen age significantly impacted on egg weight, yolk percentage, eggshell traits (color intensity, weight, thickness and strength) and egg content traits (HU value, yolk weight and color intensity, presence of meat and blood spots). Older hens laid heavier eggs with a greater yolk percentage but with thinner eggshell.

Keywords

Ajmal M.R., Chaturvedi S.K., Zaidi N., Alam P., Zaman M., Siddiqi M.K., Nus- rat S., Jamal M.S., Mahmoud M.H., Badr G., Khan R.H. (2016). Biophysical insights into the interaction of hen egg white lysozyme with therapeutic dye clofazimine: modulation of activity and SDSinduced aggregation of model protein. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 35: 2197-2210.Search in Google Scholar

Batkowska J., Brodacki A. (2017). Selected quality traits of eggs and the productivity of newlycreated laying hens dedicated to extensive system of rearing. Archiv. Anim. Breed., 60: 87-93.Search in Google Scholar

Borowiec F., Rościszewska M., Popek W., Łapiński S. (2001). The chemical composition of the Eisenia fetida (Sav.) (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 12: 357-363.Search in Google Scholar

Calik J. (2011). Assessing the quality of eggs produced by six breeds of egg-laying hens in relation to their age (In Polish). Zywn.-Nauk. Technol. Ja., 78: 85-93.Search in Google Scholar

Chodová D., Tůmová E., Charvátová V. (2013). The effect of housing system and storage conditions on egg quality. Proc. XV Eur. Symp. on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, Bergamo. World’s Poultry Sci. J., Suppl. 69.Search in Google Scholar

Clerici F., Casiraghi E., Hidalgo A., Rossi M. (2006). Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. XII Eur. Poultry Conf., Verona-Italy, 10732.Search in Google Scholar

Dalle Zotte A., Sartori A., Bordesan V. (2013). Physical egg quality from organic versus conventional laying hens. Proc. XV Eur. Symp. on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, Bergamo. Bergamo 15-19 September 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Dudek M., Rabsztyn A. (2011). Egg quality of dual-purpose hens intended for small-scale farming. Acta Sci. Pol. Zoot. 10: 3-12.Search in Google Scholar

Englmaierová N., Tunova E., Charvátova V., Skrivan M. (2014). Efeects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 8: 345-352.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrante V., Lolli S., Vezzoli G., Guidobono Cavalchini L. (2009). Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 165-174.Search in Google Scholar

Hammershøj M., Steenfeldt S. (2005). Effect of blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) in organic layer diets and supplementation with foraging material on layer performance and some egg quality parameters. Poultry Sci., 84: 723-733.Search in Google Scholar

Hammershøj M., Steenfeldt S. (2015). Organic egg production. II: The quality of organic eggs is influenced by hen genotype, diet and forage material analyzed by physical parameters, functional properties and sensory evaluation. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 208: 182-197.Search in Google Scholar

Hanusová E., Hrnčár E., Hanus A., Oravcová M. (2015). Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechn. Zoot., 18: 20-24.Search in Google Scholar

Haunshi S., Doley S., Kadirvel G. (2010). Comparative studies on egg, meat, and semen qualities of native and improved chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry production. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 1013-1019.Search in Google Scholar

Hidalgo A., Rossi M., Clerici S., Ratti S. (2008). Amarket study on the quality characteristics of egg from different housing systems. Food Chem., 106: 1031-1038.Search in Google Scholar

Hincke M.T., Nys Y., Gautron J., Mann K., Rodriguez- Navarro A.B. (2012). The eggshell structure, composition and mineralization. Front. Biosci. Special Edition on Biomineralization, 17: 1266-1280Search in Google Scholar

Holt P.S., Davies R.H., Dewulf J., Gast R.K., Huwe J.K., Jones D.R., Waltman D., Willian K.R. (2011). The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poultry Sci., 90: 251-262.Search in Google Scholar

Karadas F., Wood N.A.R., Surai P.F., Sparks N.H.C. (2005). Tissue-specific distribution of carotenoids and vitamin Ein tissues of newly hatched chicks from various avian species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol A. Mol. Integr. Physiol., 140: 506-511.Search in Google Scholar

Kimuda D.F.K., Sheideler S.E., Mc Kee S.R. (2001). The efficacy of vitamin Esupplemention in hen diets to alleviate egg quality deterioration associated with high temperature exposure. Poultry Sci., 80: 1378-1383.Search in Google Scholar

Krawczyk J. (2016). Variation in productive and reproductive traits, and egg quality in some lines of laying hens (In Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 2: 130-139.Search in Google Scholar

Küçükylmaz K., Bozkurt M., Nur Herken E., Çınar M. (2012). Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 559-568.Search in Google Scholar

Kühn J., Schutkowski A., Kluge H., Hirche F., Stangl G. (2014). Free-range farming: Anatural alternative to produce vitamin D-enriched eggs. Nutrition, 30: 481-484. Search in Google Scholar

Martínez- Alesón R., Hamelin C. (2014). Estudio de huevos de gallina adquiridos en supermercados de distintas regiones en la península Ibérica: Etiquetado, precioycolor de la yema. Proc. LI Scientific Symposium WPSA’s Spanish Branch, Valencia, http://www.wpsaaeca.com.Search in Google Scholar

Mertens K., Bamelis F., Kemps B., Kamers B., Verhoelst E., De Ketelaere B., Bain M., Decuypere E., De Baerdemaeker J. (2006). Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs. Poultry Sci., 85: 1670-1677.Search in Google Scholar

Nedomová Š., Severa L., Buchar J. (2009). Influence of hen egg shape on eggshell compressive strength. Int. Agrophys., 23: 249-256.Search in Google Scholar

Nedup D., Phurba K. (2014). Evaluation of egg quality parameters in Bhutanese indigenous chickens vis-a-vis exotic chicken. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 84: 884-890.Search in Google Scholar

Onbasilar E.E., Unal N., Erdem E., Kocakaya A., Yaranoglu B. (2015). Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Sci., 94: 1-6.Search in Google Scholar

Pavlovski Z., Hopic S., Lukic M. (2001). Housing systems for layers and egg quality. Anim Biotechnol. Husbandry, 17: 197-201.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi C., Marangon A. (2012). Quality of organic eggs of hybrid and Italian breed hens. Poultry Sci., 91: 2330-2340.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi L., Simioli G., Martelli G., Paganelli R., Sardi L. (2006). Effects of organic farming on egg quality and welfare of laying hens. XII Eur. Poult. Conf. Verona, Italy, 11, 18.10.1145/1274892Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi L., Simioli M., Martelli G., Paganelliandl R., Sardi L. (2015). Effects of organic farming on egg quality and welfare of laying hens. WPSA European Poultry Conference, pp. 677-10094.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts J.R., Chousalkar K. (2013). Egg quality and food safety of table eggs: egg quality and age of flock -ahorizontal study. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp., pp. 242-242.Search in Google Scholar

Samiullah R.J.R., Chousalkar K.K. (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 23: 59-70.Search in Google Scholar

Samiullah S., Roberts J.R., Chousalkar K. (2015). Eggshell color in brown-egg laying hens -areview. Poultry Sci., 94: 2566-2575.Search in Google Scholar

Samiullah S., Roberts J.R., Chousalkar K. (2016). Oviposition time, flock age, and egg position in clutch in relation to brown eggshell color in laying hens. Poultry Sci., 95: 2052-2057.Search in Google Scholar

Sarica M., Erensayin C. (2009). Poultry Products. In: Turkoglum., Sarica M., Poultry Science, Bey-Ofset, Ankara, Turkey, pp. 89-138.Search in Google Scholar

Shaker A.S., Hermiz H.N., Al-Khatib T.R., Mohammed R.M. (2016). Egg shape characterization for four genetic groups of Kurdish local chickens. Food and Nutrition Science - Intern. J., 1: 20-25.Search in Google Scholar

Simčič M., Stibilj V., Holcman A. (2009). The cholesterol content of eggs produced by the Slovenian autochthonous Styrian hen. Food Chem., 114: 1-4.Search in Google Scholar

Smith D.P., Musgrove M.T. (2008). Effect of blood spots in table egg albumen on Salmonella growth. Poultry Sci., 87: 1659-1661.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley V.G., Nelson D., Daley M.B. (2013). Evaluation of two laying systems (floor vs. cage) on egg production, quality, and safety. Agrotechnol., 2: 100-109Search in Google Scholar

Steenfeldt S., Hammershøj M. (2009). Challenges in organic egg-production related to the nutritional quality of foraging material and introduction of 100%organic feeding. Proc. 17th Eur. Symp. Poultry Nutr., 185.Search in Google Scholar

Steenfeldt S., Hammershøj M. (2015). Organic egg production. I: Effects of different dietary protein contents and forage material on organic egg production, nitrogen and mineral retention and total tract digestibility of nutrients of two hen genotypes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 209: 186-201.Search in Google Scholar

Steenfeldt S., Kjaer J.B., Engberg R.M. (2007). Effect of feeding silages or carrots as supplements to laying hens on production performance, nutrient digestibility, gut structure, gut microflora and feather pecking behaviour. Br. Poultry Sci., 48: 454-468.Search in Google Scholar

Świątkiewicz S., Koreleski J. (2008). The effect of zinc and manganese source in the diet for laying hens on eggshell and bones quality. Wet. Med., 53: 555-563.Search in Google Scholar

Terčič D., Žlender B., Holcman A. (2012). External, internal and sensory qualities of table eggs as influenced by two different production system. Agro-knowledge J. University of Banjaluka, Faculty of Agriculture, 13: 555-562.Search in Google Scholar

Tůmová E., Uhlířová L., Tůma R., Chodová D., Máchal L. (2017). Age related changes in laying pattern and egg weight of different laying hen genotypes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

Vanden Brand H., Parmentier H.K., Kemp A.B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Brit. Poultry Sci., 45: 745-752. Search in Google Scholar

Van Ruth S., Alewijn M., Rogers K., Newton-Smith E., Tena N., Bollen M., Koot A. (2011). Authentication of organic and conventional eggs by carotenoid profiling. Food Chem., 126: 1299-1305.Search in Google Scholar

Zita L., Tumova E., Stolc L. (2009). Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Vet. Brno., 78: 85-91.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo