The effective path of ideological governance of university cyberspace in the context of big data

[1] Han, J. H. (2017). Preferences on security issues and ideological competitions: a case of the korean national assembly. Korea Observer, 48(4), 639-668. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Basic values, ideological self-placement, and voting: a cross-cultural study. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(4), 106939711771219. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Jiang, C. (2022). Network security and ideological security based on wireless communication and big data analysis. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(3), 1-6. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Waters, J. (2018). The toxic university: zombie leadership, academic rock stars, and neoliberal ideology. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(5), 1-4. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Henriksen, A. (2019). The end of the road for the UN GGE process: The future regulation of cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(1), tyy009. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Grachikov, E. N. (2020). China in Global Governance: ideology, theory, and instrumentation. Russia in Global Affairs, 18(4), 132-153. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jorge, I. E., González-Navarro Félix, Brenda, F. R., Larysa, B., & Astorga-Vargas María. (2017). Tracking the evolution of the internet of things concept across different application domains. Sensors, 17(6), 1379. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2017). Understanding the internet of things: definition, potentials, and societal role of a fast evolving paradigm. Ad Hoc Networks, 56(mar.), 122-140. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wang, S., Zhang, F., Gong, Q., Bolati, D., & Ding, J. (2021). Research on pbl teaching of immunology based on network teaching platform. Procedia Computer Science, 183(11), 750-753. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ferrandiz, M. L., D’Ocon, P., & Ivorra, M. D. (2017). Spanish inter-university network for innovative education in pharmacology: a common space to improve learning?. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. (Suppl.2), 121. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lahmann, H. (2021). On the Politics and Ideologies of the Sovereignty Discourse in Cyberspace. Duke, J. Comp. & Int’l L., 32, 61. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Huamin, G., & Ying, F. (2019). The Identification Logic of Mainstream Ideology in Cyberspace. Teaching and Research, 53(4), 105. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pervushina, V. N., & Khutornoy, S. N. (2017). The ideology of cyberspace. Paradigmata poznani, (3), 11-19. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Xu, J., Gong, Q., & Yin, W. (2022). Maintaining ideological security and legitimacy in digital China: Governance of cyber historical nihilism. Media International Australia, 185(1), 26-40. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yang, X. N., Wang, W., Xu, X. F., Pang, G. R., & Zhang, C. L. (2018). Research on the construction of a novel cyberspace security ecosystem. Engineering, 4(001), 47-52. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kim, D. K., & Kim, S. Y. (2021). Refraining south korea’s national cybersecurity governance system in critical information infrastructure. The Korean journal of defense analysis(4), 33. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Jayawardane, S., Larik, J. E., & Kaul, M. (2016). Governing Cyberspace: Building Confidence, Capacity and Consensus. Special Section: Governing Cyberspace: Building Confidence, Capacity and Consensus, 7(1). Search in Google Scholar