A Hidden Markov Model-Based Network Security Posture Prediction Model

[1] Zhan, Z., Xu, M., & Xu, S. (2016). A Characterization of Cybersecurity Posture from Network Telescope Data. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Beinart, M. (2019, Nov. 15). Navy CIO Looking To Improve Cyber Posture With Tougher Supply Chain Security Standards. Defense Daily. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Smith, D. J., & Simpson, K. (2020). Cyber Security. In The Safety Critical Systems Handbook (Fifth Edition) (pp. 269-283). Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jiang, L., Jayatilaka, A., Nasim, M., et al. (2021). Systematic Literature Review on Cyber Situational Awareness Visualizations. arXiv e-prints. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Barker, K. (2019). Cyberattack: What Goes Around, Comes Around. SPP Briefing Papers, 12. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhang, J., Feng, H., Liu, B., et al. (2021). Research Progress and Future Trend Analysis of Network Security Situational Awareness. Springer, Cham. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jianping, H. U., Hao, H., Qi, H. E., et al. (2019). Discussion on the Construction of Cyber Security Situational Awareness Platform in Health Care Industry. Chinese Journal of Health Informatics and Management. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Qian, Z. K. (2019). Network Security Situation Awareness Framework and Random Forest Assessment Model. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Rick, Scott. (2018). Changing the industry conversation on cyber security. Naval Architect. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lenders, V., Tanner, A., & Blarer, A. (2015). Gaining an edge in cyberspace with advanced situational awareness. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(2), 65 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang, H., Yi, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Network security situation awareness framework based on threat intelligence. CMC: Computers, Materials and Continua, 56(3), 381-399. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Holsopple, J., Sudit, M., Nusinov, M., et al. (2010). Enhancing situation awareness via automated situation assessment. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(3), 146-152. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Leevy, J., Hancock, J., Zuech, R., et al. (2021). Detecting cybersecurity attacks across different network features and learners. J Big Data, 38(8), 1-29. Search in Google Scholar

[14] You, W., Simalatsar, A., & De, M. G. (2013). Parameterized SVM for personalized drug concentration prediction. 2013, 2013(2013), 5789-5792. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ke, G., Chen, R. S., Chen, Y. C., et al. (2021). Network security situation prediction method based on support vector machine optimized by artificial bee colony algorithms. Journal of Computers, 32(1), 144-153. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang, H., Huang, Q., Li, F., et al. (2016). A network security situation prediction model based on wavelet neural network with optimized parameters. Digital Communications and Networks, 2(3), 139-144. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wang, G. (2021). Comparative study on different neural networks for network security situation prediction. Security and Privacy, 4(1), e138. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Yuan, L. (2021). Prediction of network security situation awareness based on an improved model combined with neural network. Security and Privacy, 4(6), e181. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nurutdinova, A. R. (2019). Identification of automata Markov models using a modified “forward-backward” algorithm. IOP Publishing, 1158, 032041. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Han, Q., Zhang, X., Xu, K., & Du, X. (2020). Free parameter optimization of dtmds based on improved hybrid genetic-simulated annealing algorithm. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 20(10). Search in Google Scholar