This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Shaharudin, M. S.; Fernando, Y.; Jabbour, C. J. C.; Sroufe, R.; Jasmi, M. F. A. Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: A content review using social network analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 218, 629-643.Search in Google Scholar
Du, S.; Tang, W.; Song, M. Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation. Journal of cleaner production, 2016, 134, 652-662.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, B. Manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions for a capital-constrained manufacturer considering carbon emission cap and trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140, 1118-1128.Search in Google Scholar
Ma, X.; Ji, P.; Ho, W.; Yang, C. H. Optimal procurement decision with a carbon tax for the manufacturing industry. Computers & Operations Research, 2018, 89, 360-368.Search in Google Scholar
He, S.; Yin, J.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Z. How to upgrade an enterprise's low-carbon technologies under a carbon tax: The trade-off between tax and upgrade fee. Applied Energy, 2018,227, 564-573.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, Y.; Han, X.; Hu, G. Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 182, 397-408.Search in Google Scholar
Shu, T.; Peng, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, S.; Lai, K. K.; Yang, H. Government subsidy for remanufacturing or carbon tax rebate: Which is better for firms and a low-carbon economy. Sustainability, 2017, 9(1), 156.Search in Google Scholar
Cao, K.; Xu, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Q. Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167, 505-513.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, W.; Hu, Z. H. Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies under various carbon taxes and subsidies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 201, 123-141.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, D.; An, Y.; Zha, D.; Wu, F.; Wang, Q. Would an increasing block carbon tax be better? A comparative study within the Stackelberg Game framework. Journal of environmental management, 2019, 235, 328-341.Search in Google Scholar
Du, S.; Hu, L.; Wang, L. Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255(1-2), 569-590.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, L.; Wang, C. Sustainable manufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain considering emission reduction and remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 131, 297-304.Search in Google Scholar
Li, J.; Du, W.; Yang, F.; Hua, G. The carbon subsidy analysis in remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain. Sustainability, 2014, 6(6), 3861-3877.Search in Google Scholar
Li, H.; Wang, C.; Xu, L.; Ou, W. Pricing, carbon emission reduction, collection decision, and coordination in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2017, 9(6), 065907.Search in Google Scholar
Wan, N. The impacts of low carbon subsidy, collection mode, and power structure on a closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2018, 10(6), 065904.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, M. C.; Lobel, R.; Perakis, G. The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Science, 2016, 62(5), 1235-1258.Search in Google Scholar
Rong, Y.; Chen, Y. J.; Shen, Z. J. M. The impact of demand uncertainty on product line design under endogenous substitution. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2015, 62(2), 143-157.Search in Google Scholar
Feng, Y.; Viswanathan, S. Impact of demand uncertainty on coordinating supply chain inventories through common replenishment epochs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2007, 58(7), 964-971.Search in Google Scholar
Chan, H. L.; Shen, B.; Cai, Y. Quick response strategy with cleaner technology in a supply chain: Coordination and win-win situation analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 56(10), 3397-34088.Search in Google Scholar
Choi, T. M. Carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 68(1-4), 835-847.Search in Google Scholar
Drake, D. F.; Kleindorfer, P. R.; Van Wassenhove, L. N. Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production and Operations Management, 2016, 25(6), 1006-1025.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, R.; Zhang, J.; Ru, J. Impacts of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(5), 1232-1249.Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, W.; Chen, X. Optimal strategies for manufacturer with strategic customer behavior under carbon emissions-sensitive random demand. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2016, 116(4), 759-776.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, B.; Qu, S.; Li, P.; Huang, R. Optimal Strategies for Manufacturers with the Reference Effect under Carbon Emissions-Sensitive Random Demand. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 1-15.Search in Google Scholar
Bai, Q.; Xu, J.; Chauhan, S. S. Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142, 106324.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, B.; Li, T.; Tsai, S. B. Low carbon strategy analysis of competing supply chains with different power structures. Sustainability, 2017, 9(5), 835.Search in Google Scholar
Meng, X.; Yao, Z.; Nie, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Z. Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 200, 224-230.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, X.; Dong, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X. Who should invest in clean technologies in a supply chain with competition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 215, 689-700.Search in Google Scholar