Empirical study on big data of workplace spirituality theory method and computational simulation
and | Dec 21, 2020
About this article
Published Online: Dec 21, 2020
Page range: 405 - 414
Received: Jul 16, 2020
Accepted: Aug 14, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2020.2.00059
Keywords
© 2020 EnWei Cao et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Reliability and validity
| JE | V | I am willing to go to work when getting up early in the morning. I am much energetic when working. I am patient enough even if my work is not going on well. I can keep working for a long time. | 0.794 | 22.436 | 0.829 | 0.851 |
| D | I work to strive for what I can create for myself. I am fully enthusiastic so that the work can go on smoothly. I am full of confidence about my work. | 0.834 | 19.213 | 0.840 | ||
| A | I cannot feel that the time passes by quickly when I am working. I can devote myself to the work when I am working. I believe that my confidence cannot be without my duty. | 0.812 | 18.351 | 0.857 | ||
Correlation analysis
| MW | SOC | IL | SES | TS | V | D | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MW | 1 | |||||||
| SOC | 0.350 | 1 | ||||||
| IL | 0.386 | 0.377 | 1 | |||||
| SES | 0.245 | 0.297 | 0.253 | 1 | ||||
| TS | 0.307 | 0.196 | 0.260 | 0.385 | 1 | |||
| V | 0.256 | 0.234 | 0.262 | 0.161 | 0.191 | 1 | ||
| D | 0.291 | 0.268 | 0.305 | 0.325 | 0.294 | 0.182 | 1 | |
| A | 0.209 | 0.300 | 0.284 | 0.240 | 0.142 | 0.143 | 0.139 | 1 |
| Mean | 3.515 | 3.311 | 3.387 | 3.460 | 3.382 | 3.309 | 3.190 | 3.363 |
| SD | 0.844 | 0.742 | 0.789 | 0.903 | 0.899 | 0.803 | 0.926 | 0.944 |
Regression analysis of WS on JE
| A | Constant | 1.493 | 0.375 | 3.983 | 0.000 | |
| MW | 0.074 | 0.086 | 0.066 | 1.857 | 0.043 | |
| SOC | 0.266 | 0.098 | 0.209 | 2.720 | 0.007 | |
| IL | 0.216 | 0.093 | 0.180 | 2.315 | 0.022 | |
The moderating effect of POS (TS)
| Variable | JE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | |
| WS | 0.512*** | 0.462*** | 0.361*** |
| TS | 0.100*** | 0.711** | |
| WS*TS | 0.240*** | ||
| 0.276 | 0.293 | 0.340 | |
| Δ | 0.276 | 0.017 | 0.047 |
| 71.863*** | 39.594*** | 32.981*** | |
Sample characteristics
| Gender | Male | 102 | 54.5 |
| Female | 85 | 45.5 | |
| Age | <25 | 45 | 24.1 |
| 26–35 years old | 76 | 40.6 | |
| 36–45 years old | 43 | 23.0 | |
| >45 | 23 | 12.3 | |
| Education | High school | 36 | 19.3 |
| Undergraduate | 112 | 59.9 | |
| Master's degree | 25 | 13.4 | |
| Doctoral degree | 14 | 5.9 | |
| Position | General position | 96 | 51.3 |
| Basic manager | 56 | 29.9 | |
| Middle manger | 24 | 12.8 | |
| Top manager | 11 | 5.9 | |
| Company type | State-owned business | 43 | 23.0 |
| Business personnel | 39 | 20.9 | |
| Official | 25 | 13.4 | |
| Private business | 80 | 42.8 | |
The moderating effect of POS (SES)
| Variable | JE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | |
| WS | 0.512*** | 0.446*** | 0.216*** |
| SES | 0.128*** | 0.515** | |
| WS*SES | 0.186*** | ||
| 0.276 | 0.307 | 0.337 | |
| Δ | 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.030 |
| 71.863*** | 18.206*** | 16.717*** | |