Application of Balanced Scorecard in Performance Evaluation of Educational Management

[1] Vargas, L., Mac-Lean, C., & Huge, J. (2019). The maturation process of incorporating sustainability in universities. International journal of sustainability in higher education, 20(3), 441–451. Search in Google Scholar

[2] McCarthy, & Josh. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Taylor, & Francis. (2017). Mobility as a continuum: european commission mobility policies for schools and higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 32. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Zhou, P., Zhou, P., & Sciubba, E. (2019). Balanced scorecard-based evaluation of sustainable energy investment projects with it2 fuzzy hybrid decision making approach. Energies, 13. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Benková, Gallo, Balogová, & Nemec. (2020). Factors affecting the use of balanced scorecard in measuring company performance. Sustainability, 12(3), 1178. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hristov, I., Chirico, A., & Appolloni, A. (2019). Sustainability value creation, survival, and growth of the company: a critical perspective in the sustainability balanced scorecard (sbsc). Sustainability, 11(7), 2119. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gambelli, D., Solfanelli, F., Orsini, S., & Zanoli, R. (2021). Measuring the economic performance of small ruminant farms using balanced scorecard and importance-performance analysis: a european case study. Sustainability, 13. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sousa, T. B. D., Melo, I. C., Oliveira, P. H. D., Loureno, C. M., & Esposto, K. F. (2020). Balanced scorecard for evaluating the performance of supply chains: a bibliometric study. Journal of Engineering Research, 8(1), 294–313. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Fathema, N., & Akanda, M. H. (2020). Effects of instructors’ academic disciplines and prior experience with learning management systems: a study about the use of canvas. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (4). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wonah, F. (2019). Human resource management practices and quality of teaching in private secondary schools in cross river state, nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., & Yan, B. (2021). Customer knowledge management competence evaluation of tourism enterprises based on ahp-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems(7), 1–13. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Mona, J. P., Mahnaz, H., Mohammad, B. A., & Fatemeh, T. (2017). Developing a new framework for evaluating e-learning systems: integrating bsc and fahp. Kybernetes, 46(8), 00–00. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rafiq, M., Zhang, X., Yuan, J., Naz, S., & Maqbool, S. (2020). Impact of a balanced scorecard as a strategic management system tool to improve sustainable development: measuring the mediation of organizational performance through pls-smart. Sustainability, 12(4). Search in Google Scholar

[14] Margriet, E., van, der, SluisGerry, & J., et al. (2017). Implementing new public management in educational policy. Educational Policy, 31(3), 303–329. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Akdemir, N., Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H., & Emma Paternotte…. (2017). How changing quality management influenced pgme accreditation: a focus on decentralization and quality improvement. BMC Medical Education, 17. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Scavarda, A., Dias, A., Reis, A., Silveira, H., & Santos, I. (2021). A covid-19 pandemic sustainable educational innovation management proposal framework. Sustainability, 13(11), 6391. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mintrop, R., Ordenes, M., Coghlan, E., Pryor, L., & Madero, C. (2017). Teacher evaluation, pay for performance, and learning around instruction: between dissonant incentives and resonant procedures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X1769655. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Antoniou, P., & Lu, M. (2017). Evaluating the measuring properties of the principal instructional management rating scale in the chinese educational system: implications for measuring school leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 624–641. Search in Google Scholar