Analysis of Doppler Criteria in the Diagnosis Of IUGR

1. Rahimian J, Varner MW. Disproportionate Fetal Growth, in DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N (eds): Current Diagnosis & Treatmentin Obstetrics & Gynecology. Medical Publishing Division McGraw-Hill Co. Inc. USA, International Edition 2006, 288-300.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kahn BF, Hobbins JC, Galan HL. Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard IE (eds): Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, 2008, 198-219.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL et al. Williams Obstetrics 23st Ed by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Medical Publishing Division, USA, 2010, 843-852.Search in Google Scholar

4. Mari G, Hanif F. Intrauterine growth restriction: how to manage and when to deliver. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:497-509.10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c96a917513935Search in Google Scholar

5. Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, D'Antona D, Saccardi C, Mari G. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profi le changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1240-1245.10.1097/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a16319247Search in Google Scholar

6. Kurmanavicius J, Florio I, Wisser J et al. Reference resistance indices of the umbilical, fetal middle cerebral and uterine arteries at 24-42 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:112-120.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020112.x9286020Search in Google Scholar

7. Acharya G, Wilsqaard T, Berntsen KR, Maltau JM, Kiserud T. Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:937-944.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.01915746695Search in Google Scholar

8. Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Merialdi A. Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:416-420.10.1097/00006250-199203000-000181738525Search in Google Scholar

9. Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revised. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:124-127.10.1002/uog.2012601831Search in Google Scholar

10. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ. Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;96(3):321-327.Search in Google Scholar

11. Marconi AM, Ronzoni S, Bozzetti P et al. Comparison of fetal and neonatal growth curves in detecting growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112: 1227-1234.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818bdc7e275273019037030Search in Google Scholar

12. Bamfo JE, Odibo AO. Diagnosis and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:640-715.Search in Google Scholar

13. Figueras F, Eixarch E, Meler E et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136(1):34-38.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.01617434250Search in Google Scholar

14. Simanaviciute D, Gudmundsson S. Fetal middle cerebral to uterine artery pulsatility index ratios in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:794-801.10.1002/uog.380517029308Search in Google Scholar

15. Odibo AO, Riddick C, Pare E, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: evaluating the impact of using gestational age-specifi c reference values. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1223-1228.10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.122316123182Search in Google Scholar

16. Mihu D. Examenul ecografi c Doppler în trimestrele II și III de sarcină, în Mihu D (ed): Ecografi a Doppler în obstetrică și ginecologie. Editura Clusium, Cluj-Napoca, 2001, 78-214. Search in Google Scholar