[
1. Abelson J, Bombard Y, Gauvin FP, Simeonov D, Boesveld S. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:282-289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. British Medical Association. Patient and public involvement – A toolkit for doctors. London: BMA; 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Dimitrova Z, Getov I. Fundamentals of pharmacy practice and business. 2009; Sofia: ed. University press “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334-340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Hansen HP, Lee A, Van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: A review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:330-336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Health Equality Europe. Understanding health technology assessment (HTA). Health Equality Europe; 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Health Technology Assessment International. HTAi strategic plan 2009 – 2013 (section on background and environment). Canada: HTAi; 2009 www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/StrategicPlan2009To2013Materials/HTAi2009To2013StrategicPlan.pdf (accessed March 27, 2019). Health Technology Assessment International. HTAi strategic plan 2009 – 2013 (section on background and environment). Canada: HTAi; 2009 www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/StrategicPlan2009To-2013Materials/HTAi2009To2013StrategicPlan.pdf (accessed March 28, 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. https://www.cadth.ca (accessed March 27, 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. HTA resources – definition of technology assessment. Sweden: INAHTA. www.inahta.org/HTA/ (accessed April 4, 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: A study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38:89-122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:75-89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Ozieranski P, McKee M, King L. The politics of health technology assessment in Poland. Health Policy (New York). 2012; 108 (2–3):178-193. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol. 2012. 10.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Pivik J, Rode E, Ward C. A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. Health Policy. 2004;69:253-68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Hansen HP. Knowledge in health technology assessment: Who, what, how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:324-329.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Whitty JA. An International Survey of the Public Engagement Pract ices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations. Value Health. 2013;16:155-163.
]Search in Google Scholar
