[AHMAD, M. – RAJAPAKSHA, A. U. – LIM, J. E. – ZHANG, M. – BOLAN, N. – MOHAN, D. – VITHANAGE, M. – LEE, S. S. – OK, Y. S. 2014. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. In Chemosphere, vol. 99, 2014, pp. 19–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.07110.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.07124289982]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CASTALDI, S. – RIONDINO, M. – BARANTI, S. – ESPOSITO, F. R. – MARZAIOLI, R. – RUTIGLIANO, F. A. – VACCARI, F. R. – MIGIETTA, F. 2011. Impact of biochar application to a Mediterranean wheat crop on soil microbial acidity and greenhouse gas fluxes. In Chemosphere, vol. 85, 2011, pp. 1461–1471. DOI: 101.1016/j.chemosphere.011.08.03110.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.03121944041]Search in Google Scholar
[CHINTALA, R. – MOLLINDE, J. – SCHUMACHER, T. E. – PAPIERNIK, S. K. – MALO, D. D. – KUMAR, S. – GULBRSDSON, D. W. 2013. Nitrate sorption and desorption in biochars from fast pyrolysis. In Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 179, 2013, pp. 250–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.05.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2013.05.023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CHINTALA, R. – SCHUMMACHER, T. E. – KUMAR, S. – MALO, D. D. – RICE, J. A. – BLEAKLEM, B. – CHILOM, G. – CLAY, D. E. – JULSOIN, J. L. – PAPIERNIK, S. K. – GU, Z. R. 2014. Molecular characterization of biochars and their influence on microbiological properties of soil. In Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 279, 2014, pp. 244–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhhazmat.2014.06.07410.1016/j.jhhazmat.2014.06.074]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CORNELISSEN, G. – NURIDA, N. L. – HALE, S. E. – MARTINSEN, V. – SILVANI, L. – MULDER, J. 2018. Fading positive effect of biochar on crop yield and soil acidity during five growth seasons in an Indonesian Ultisol. In Science of The Total Environment, vol. 634, 2018, pp. 561–568. DOI: j.scietotenv.2018.03.38010.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.38029635198]Search in Google Scholar
[DAI, Z. – ZHANG, X. – TANG, C. – MUHAMMAD, N. – WU, J. – BROOKES, P. C. – XU, J. 2017. Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification. In Science of The Total Environmental, vol. 581–582, 2017, pp. 601–611. DOI: 10.1016/scietotenv.2016.12.16910.1016/scietotenv.2016.12.169]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ESSINGTON, M. E. 2004. Competetive sorption behavior of arsenic, sellenium, coper and lead by soil and biosolid nano and macro colloid particles. In Open Journal of Soil Science, vol. 4, 2004, pp. 293–304. DOI: 10.4236/ojss.2014.4903110.4236/ojss.2014.49031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FIALA, K. – KOBZA, J. – MATÚŠKOVÁ, Ľ. – BREČKOVÁ, V. – MAKOVNÍKOVÁ, J. – BARANČÍKOVÁ, G. – BÚRIK, V. – LITAVEC, T. – HOUŠKOVÁ, B. – CHROMANIČOVÁ, A. – VÁRADIOVÁ, D. – PECHOVÁ, B. 1999. Záväzné metódy rozborov pôd. Čiastkový monitorovací systém – PÔDA. 1. vyd. Bratislava : VUPOP, 1999, 142 s. ISBN 80-85361-55-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[FIDEL, R. B. – LAIRD, D. A. – THOMPSON, M. L. – LAWRENKO, M. 2017. Characterization and quantification of biochar alkalinity. In Chemosphere, vol. 167, 2017, pp. 367–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.15110.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.15127743533]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GUO, J. H. – LIU, X. J. – ZHANG, Y. – SHEN, J. L. – HAN, W. X. – CHRISTIE, P. – GOULDING, K. W. T. – VITOSEK, P. M. 2010. Singificant acidification in major Chinese croplands. In College of Ressources and Evironmental Science, vol. 19, 2010, pp. 1008–1010. DOI: 10.1126/science.118257010.1126/.1182570]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HANSEN, V. – STÓVER, D. M. – MUKHOLM, L. J. – PELTRE, C. – HAGGAARD-NIELSEN, H. – JENSEN, L. S. 2016. The effect of straw and wood gasification biochar on carbon sequestration, selected soil fertility indicators and functional groups in soil: An incubation study. In Geoderma, vol. 269, 2016, pp. 99–107. DOI: j.geoderma.2016.01.03310.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.033]Search in Google Scholar
[HORÁK, J. – KONDRLOVÁ, E. – IGAZ, D. – ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – FELBER, R. – LUKAC, M. – BALASHOV, E. V. – BUCHKINA, N. P. – RIZHIYA, E. Y. – JANKOWSKI, M. 2017. Biochar and biocharwith N fertilizeraffectsoil N2O emission in HaplicLuvisol. In Biologia, vol. 72, 2017, pp. 995–1001. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2017-010910.1515/biolog-2017-0109]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[JURIGA, M. – ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – HORÁK, J. – KONDRLOVÁ, E. – IGAZ, D. – POLLÁKOVÁ, N. – BUCHKINA, N. P. – BALASHOV, E. 2018. The effect of different rates of biochar and biochar in combination with N fertilizer on the parameters of soil organic matter and soil structure. In Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 19, 2018, pp. 153–161. DOI: 10.129/22998993/9289410.12911/22998993/92894]Search in Google Scholar
[JURIGA, M. – ŠIMANSKÝ, V. 2018. Effect of biochar on soil structure-review. In Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, vol. 19, 2018, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.15414/afz.2018.21.01.11-1910.15414/afz.2018.21.01.11-19]Search in Google Scholar
[KEILUWEIT, M. – NICO, P. S. – KLEBER, M. 2010. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomaso-derived black carbon (biochar). In Environmental Science and Technol., vol. 44, 2010, pp. 1247–1253. DOI: 10.1021/es903141910.1021/es9031419]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[KOCHIAN, L. V. – PIŇEREROS, M. A. – LIU, J. – MAGALHAES, I. V. 2015. Plant adaptation to acid soils: The molecular basis of crop aluminium resistance. In Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 66, 2015, pp. 571–598. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-04301410.1146/annurev-arplant-043014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LEHMANN, J. – RILLING, M. C. – THIES, J. – MASIELLO, C. A. – HOCKADAY, W. C. – CROWLEY, D. 2011. Biochar affect on soil biota – A review. In Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 43, 2011, pp. 1812–1836. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.02210.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LIANG, B. – LEHMANN, J. – SOLOMON, D. – KINYANG, J. – GROSSMAN, J. – O’NEILL, B. – SKIEMSTAD, J. O. – LUZAO, T. J. – PETERSEN, J. – NEVES, E. G. 2006. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soil. In Soil Sciency Society of American Journal, vol. 70, 2006, pp. 35–44.10.2136/sssaj2005.0383]Search in Google Scholar
[LORENZ, K. – LAL, R. 2014. Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. In Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 177, 2014, pp. 651–670. DOI: 10.1002/jpnl.20140005810.1002/jpnl.201400058]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MARTIN, S. M. – KOOKANA, R. S. – ZWEITEN, L. V. – KRULL, E. 2012. Marked changes in herbicide sorption desorption upon ageing of biochars in soils. In Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 231–232, 2012, pp. 70–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.04010.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.040]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MASUD, M. M. – LI, J. Y. – XU, R. K. 2014. Use of alkaline slag and crop residue biochars to promote base saturation and reduce acidity of an acidic Ultisoil. In Pedosphere, vol. 21, 2014, pp. 791–798. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60066-710.1016/S1002-0160(14)60066-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[NOVAK, J. M. – LIMA, I. – XING, B. – GSKIN, J. W. – STEINER, CH. – DAS, K. C. – AHMEDNA, M. – REHRAH, D. – WATTS, D. W. – BUSSCHER, W. J. – SCHOMBERG, H. 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effect on a Loamy sand. In Annals of Environmental Science, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 195–206. ISSN 1939-2621.]Search in Google Scholar
[OBIA, A. – CORNELISSEN, G. – MOLDE, J. – DÖRSH, P. 2015. Effect of soil pH increase by biochar on NO, H2O and N2 production during denitrification in acid soils. In Research Article, vol. 10, 2015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138710.1371/journal.pone.0138781]Search in Google Scholar
[REN, X. YUAN, X. – SUN, W. 2018. Dynamic changes in atrazine and phenauthrene sorption behaviors during the aging of biochar in soils. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, 2018, pp. 81–90. DOI: 10.1007/s1135610.1007/s11356]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RENGEL, Z. 2002. Handbook of planth growth, pH as the master variable. New York : Marcel Dekter, 2002, 446 p. ISBN 978082470761310.1201/9780203910344]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – HORÁK, J. – IGAZ, D. – BALASHOV, E. – JONCZAK, J. 2018. Biochar and biochar with N fertilizer as a potential tool for improving soil sorption of nutrients. In Journal of Soils and Sediments, vol. 18, 2018, pp. 1432–1440. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-017-1886-y10.1007/s11368-017-1886-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – HORÁK, J. – IGAZ, D. – JONCZAK, J. – MARKIEWICZ, M. – FELBER, R. – RIZHIYA, E. Y. – LUKAC, M. 2016. How dose of biochar and biochar with nitrogen can improve the parameters of soil organic matter and soil structure? In Biologia, vol. 71, 2016, no. 9, pp. 989–995. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2016-012210.1515/biolog-2016-0122]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – IGAZ, D. – HORÁK, J. – ŠURDA, P. – KOLENČÍK, M. – BUCHKINA, N. P. – UZAROWICZ, Ł. – JURIGA, M. – ŠRANK, D. – PAUKOVÁ, Ž. 2018a. Response of soil organic carbon and water-stable aggregates to different biochar treatments including nitrogen fertilizer. In Journal Hydrology and Hydromechanics, vol. 66, 2018, pp. 429–436. DOI: 10.2478/john-2018-003310.2478/john-2018-0033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[TEUTSCHEROVA, N. – VAZGUEZ, E. – SANTANA, D. – NAVAS, M. – MASAGUER, M. B. 2017. In fluence of pruning waste compost maturity and biochars on carbon dynamics in acid soil: Incubation study. In European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 78, 2017, pp. 66–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.12.00110.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.12.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[THOMPSON, R. C. – BAKIR, A. – STEVEN, J. – RICHARD, C. 2012. Competetive ofpersistant organic pollutants into microplastic in the marine environment. In Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 64, 2012, pp. 2782–2789. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpollbul.2012.09.01010.1016/j.marpollbul.2012.09.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[WANG, B. – LI, C. – LIANG, H. 2013. Bioleaching of heavy metal from woody biochar aging Acidithio bacillusferrooxidans and activation for adsorption. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 146, 2013, pp. 803–806. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotech.2013.08.02010.1016/j.biotech.2013.08.020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[YANG, X. – YING, G. G. – KOOKANA, R. S. 2009. Reduced plant uptake of pesticides with biochar additions to soil. In Chemosphere, vol. 76, 2009, pp. 665–667. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.00110.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.00119419749]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[YU, L. – LU, X. – YU, M. – XU, J. 2017. Combined application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer benefits nitrogen retention in the rhizosphere of soybean by increasing microbial biomass but not altering microbial community structure. In Science of the Total Environment, vol. 187, 2017, pp. 640–641. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitoenv.2018.06.01810.1016/j.scitoenv.2018.06.018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[YUAN, J. H. – XU, R. K. – ZHANG, H. 2011. The forms of alkalis in the biochars produced from crop residues at different temperatures. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, 2011, pp. 3488–3497. DOI: j.biotech.2010.11.01810.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.01821112777]Search in Google Scholar
[ZHANG, S. – ZHANG, B. – LI, X. 2002. Evolution of soil fertility and fertilizer benefits under different soil types and cropping systems. In Plant Nutrition Fertilization Science, vol. 8, 2002, pp. 9–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZHANG, Y. – YANG, S. – FU, M. M. – CAI, J. P. – ZHANG, Y. Y. – WANG, R. Z. – XU, Z. W. – BAI, Y. T. – JIANG, Y. 2015. Sheep manure application increases soil exchangeable base cations in a semi-arid steppe of Inner Mongolia. In Journal of Arid Land, vol. 7, 2015, pp. 361–369. DOI: 10.1007/s40333015-0004-510.1007/s40333015-0004-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ZONG, Y. – WANG, Y. – SHENG, Y. – WU, C. – LU, S. 2018. Ameliorating soil acidity and physical properties of two contrasting texture Ultisols with wastewater sludge biochar. In Environmental Science and Pollutant Research, vol. 25, 2018, pp. 25726–25733. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9509-010.1007/s11356-017-9509-028634801]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar