1. bookVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-5999
First Published
12 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Leaching of Elements from Soil in Grassland Field Crops Treated with Raw and Acidified Slurry

Published Online: 13 Sep 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 26 (2022) - Issue 1 (January 2022)
Page range: 145 - 156
Received: 01 May 2022
Accepted: 01 Jun 2022
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-5999
First Published
12 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The state of soils was presented in the aspect of environmental protection when using acidified slurry was used as fertilizer to protect ammonia from escaping into the atmosphere. The use of concentrated sulfuric acid to lower the pH of the slurry and thus retain nitrogen in the soil and then use it by crops gives a double benefit, reduces nitrogen losses, and reduces the cost of mineral fertilizers that should be purchased. Injecting raw slurry below the surface of the soil has some benefits in the form of reducing ammonia emissions, but it does not affect the use of fertilizers with the addition of sulfur, which is ensured in the case of acidification of the slurry. Additional benefit is to obtain environment protection. Leaching of elements from grassland and corn crop soil treated with raw cattle slurry and acidified cattle slurry (m3·ha−1) was presented. The K content was highest in the leachate collected after the application of the last batch of acidified slurry. Yield tests were conducted on similar soils as presented in the tables for grass, using six 500 m2 plots with corn, cultivar ES Cirrus, with acidified slurry and one test plot with non-acidified slurry. Analysis of variance and significant difference among the treatment means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at a probability level of 0.05. Based on statistical analysis, it was demonstrated that crop yields of corn grain increased when fertilized with acidified slurry, at an average of 4 t·ha−1. During field tests corn crop yield varied from 14 t·ha−1 to 18 t·ha−1 when non-acidified and acidified slurry were used. The yield on the grassland was approx. 30 t·ha−1. The soil sorption complex, in combination with its buffer properties and acidification, did not affected the pH value. This makes the acidification process safe for plants and for the soil environment.

Keywords

Baltic Slurry Acidification. (2017). Slurryacidificationhas widebenefits. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from http://balticslurry.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Policy-Brief-Benefits.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J. (2011). General aspects and international regulations concerning soil tillage conservation from the point of view of agricultural crop production and environment protection. Conservation tillage systems and environment protection in sustainable agriculture. Red. E. Kamiński. Falenty. Wydaw. ITP, 7-21. Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J. (2011). Some aspects of plants cultivation using precision agriculture. Development trends in soil cultivation and fertilization engineering in the aspect of organic farming standards. Red. E. Kamiński. Falenty. Wydaw. ITP, 127-160. Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J., & Borek, K. (2019). Remote sensing in farm machinery design-as fundamental improvement of development-of precision agriculture phenomenon. Polish Technical Review. Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J., Mazur, K. E., Kierończyk, M., Borek, K., Wardal, W. J., & Roman, K. K. (2020). Wpływ zakwaszania gnojowicy kwasem siarkowym na wybrane właściwości fizykochemiczne gleb w przykładowych uprawach. Przemysł Chemiczny, 99, 1600-1604.10.15199/62.2020.11.2 Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J., Mazur, K., & Borek, K. (2020). Some aspects of using automated electronic systems in development of modern agriculture. Inżynieria Materiałowa, 41(4), 13-18. Search in Google Scholar

Barwicki, J., Roman, K., Borek, K., Mazur, K., Wardal, W. J., Kierończyk, M. (2021). Some experimental studies concerning mixing of loose and liquid agricultural materials. Inżynieria Mate-riałowa, 42(4-5), 18-20.10.15199/28.2021.4-5.2 Search in Google Scholar

Beausang, C., McDonnell, K., & Murphy, F. (2021). Assessing the environmental sustainability of grass silage and cattle slurry for biogas production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126838.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126838 Search in Google Scholar

Borowski, P. F. (2020). Zonal and Nodal Models of energy market in European Union. Energies, 13(16), 4182.10.3390/en13164182 Search in Google Scholar

Borusiewicz A., Barwicki J. (2017). Slurry management on family farms using acidification system to reduce ammonia emmisions. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska (Annual Set The Environment Protection), nr 19, s. 423-438. Search in Google Scholar

Fangueiro, D., Ribeiro, H., Vasconcelos, E., Coutinho, J., Cabral, F. (2009). Treatment by acidification followed by solid–liquid separation affects slurry and slurry fractions composition and their potential of N mineralization. Bioresource technology, 100(20), 4914-4917.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.03219464881 Search in Google Scholar

Fangueiro, D., Surgy, S., Coutinho, J., & Vasconcelos, E. (2013). Impact of cattle slurry acidification on carbon and nitrogen dynamics during storage and after soil incorporation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 176(4), 540-550.10.1002/jpln.201200117 Search in Google Scholar

Fangueiro, D., Surgy, S., Napier, V., Menaia, J., Vasconcelos, E., & Coutinho, J. (2014). Impact of slurry management strategies on potential leaching of nutrients and pathogens in a sandy soil amended with cattle slurry. Journal of environmental management, 146, 198-205.10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.02725173728 Search in Google Scholar

Jaggi, R. C., Aulakh, M. S., & Sharma, R. (2005). Impacts of elemental S applied under various temperature and moisture regimes on pH and available P in acidic, neutral and alkaline soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 41(1), 52-58.10.1007/s00374-004-0792-9 Search in Google Scholar

Patuk, I., & Borowski, P. F. (2020, November). Computer aided engineering design in the development of agricultural implements: a case study for a DPFA. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1679, No. 5, p. 052005). IOP Publishing.10.1088/1742-6596/1679/5/052005 Search in Google Scholar

Riley, N. G., Zhao, F. J., & McGrath, S. P. (2002). Leaching losses of sulphur from different forms of sulphur fertilizers: a field lysimeter study. Soil Use and Management, 18(2), 120-126.10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00229.x Search in Google Scholar

Siebielec, G. et al. (2012). Monitoring of arable soils in Poland in 2010–2012 (final report)]. Wyd. IUNG-PIB Puławy [in Polish]. Search in Google Scholar

Singleton, H., J., (2000). Ambient water quality guidelines for sulphate. Water quality – Standards – British Columbia. 2. Sulphates – Environmental aspects – British Columbia. Water Management Branch. Vancouver, Canada. Search in Google Scholar

Skwierawska, M., Zawartka, L., & Zawadzki, B. (2008). The effect of different rates and forms of sulphur applied on changes of soil agrochemical properties. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54,(4), 171–177.10.17221/391-PSE Search in Google Scholar

Wardal W.J., Kierończyk M., Barwicki J., Borek K., Mazur K., Konieczna K. 2019. Wardal, W. J., Kierończyk, M., Barwicki, J., Borek, K., Mazur, K., & Konieczna, A. (2019). Uwarunkowania prawne stosowania dodatku kwasu siarkowego do gnojowicy w celu zmniejszenia strat azotu. Przemysł Chemiczny, 98, 1179-1183.10.15199/62.2019.8.1 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo