1. bookVolume 70 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters

Published Online: 03 Apr 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 70 (2020) - Issue 1 (March 2020)
Page range: 71 - 80
Received: 19 Nov 2019
Accepted: 10 Mar 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze infection of sows with endoparasites depending on their physiological phase and length of exploitation, as well as to determine the effects of infection on selected parameters of reproductive performance. 300 fecal samples collected from the same 75 sows in 4 phases of the production cycle (dry sows, low pregnancy, high pregnancy, lactation) were tested in the experiment. Species and gender diversity, prevalence, OPG and EPG were determined in the study. These parameters were compared in terms of the physiological phase and the length of exploitation. Selected parameters of reproductive performance of sows were also examined, which were compared taking into account the length of exploitation and sows infection with individual parasites.

The study showed that the entire population was infected with two parasites at all physiological phases: Eimeria spp. (17% prevalence, 2275 OPG) and Ascaris suum (5% prevalence, EPG 79). The presence of parasites from Eimeria genus (prevalence 40%, OPG 2976) in sows exploited for 1 year had a negative effect on some parameters of their reproduction performance. Infected sows, compared to noninfected ones, were characterized by a lower number of live piglets (by 0.21 heads) (p≤0.05), a higher number of stillborn piglets (by 0.21 heads) (p≤0.05), as well as lower daily weight gains of piglets (by 15 g) (p≤0.05), which contributed to their lower weaning body weight (by 0.45 kg) (p≤0.05).

Keywords

1. Gundłach J.L., Sadzikowski A.B.: Parasitology and parasitosis of animals. PWRiL, Warszawa; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

2. Nosal P., Eckert R.: Gastrointestinal parasites of swine in relation to the age group and management system. Med Wet 2005, 61 (4):435–437.10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02736-1Search in Google Scholar

3. Villee C.A., Berg L.R., Solomon E.P., Martin D.W.: Biology, Mulico Publishing House, Warszawa 2011.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jackson A.S.: Practical control of sow feed costs. Advances in Pork Production 2009, 20.Search in Google Scholar

5. Jankowska-Mąkosa A., Knecht D.: The influence of endoparasites on selected production parameters in pigs in various housing systems. Res Vet Sci 2015, 100:152–160.10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar

6. Moehn S., Franco D., Levesque C., Samuel R., Bal R.O.: New Energy and Amino Acid Requirements for Gestating Sows. Advances in Pork Production 2011:22.Search in Google Scholar

7. Eijck J.L., Borgsteede F.H.M.: A survey of gastrointestinal pig parasites on free-range, organic and conventional pig farms in the Netherlands, Veterinary research Communication 2018, 29 (5):407–414.10.1007/s11259-005-1201-zSearch in Google Scholar

8. Hoste H.: Adaptive physiological processes in the host during gastrointestinal parasitism. Int J Parasitol 2001, 31:231–244.10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00167-3Search in Google Scholar

9. Jankowska-Mąkosa A., Knecht D., Nicpoń J., Nicpoń J., Duziński K.: Level of endoparasite infection in free-living wild boars in relation to carcass weight and sex. Med Wet 2019, 75 (4):232–237.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kalinowska R., Pawiak R., Knecht D.: The influence of brown coal and humic acids on rearing results of piglets. Med Wet 1993, 49, 4:178–181.Search in Google Scholar

11. Knecht D., Popiołek M., Zaleśny G.: Does meatiness of pigs depend on the level of gastrointestinal parasites infection? Prev Vet Med 2011, 99: 234–239.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.01.00921334086Search in Google Scholar

12. Saraiva A., Abreu M.L.T.: Piglet birth weight, subsequent performance, carcass traits and pork quality: A meta-analytical study. Livest Sci 2018, 214:175–179.10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.019Search in Google Scholar

13. Šamanc H, Sladojević Ž, Vujanac I, Prodanović R, Kirovski M, Dodovski P, Kirovski D.: Relationship between growth of nursing pigs and composition of sow colostrum and milk from anterior and posterior mammary glands, Acta Vet-Beograd 2013, 63:5–6.10.2298/AVB1306537SSearch in Google Scholar

14. Kipper M., Andretta I., Gonzalez Monteiro S., Lovatto P.A., Lehnen C.R.: Meta-analysis of the effects of endoparasites on pig performance. Vet Parasitol 2011, 181:316–320.10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.02921570193Search in Google Scholar

15. Spoolder H.A.M., Waiblinger S.: Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: A review of success and risk factors. Livest Sci 2009, 125:1–14.10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.009Search in Google Scholar

16. Turner A.I., Hemsworth P.H., Tilbrook A.J.: Susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress or elevation of cortisol. Domest Anim Endocrin 2005, 29 (2):398–410.10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.02.03115998505Search in Google Scholar

17. Zajac A.M., Conboy G.A.: Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, New York; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kim S.W., Hurley W.L., Wu G., Ji F.: Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:123–132.10.2527/jas.2008-145219098235Search in Google Scholar

19. Chantziaras I., Dewulf J., Van Limbergen T., Klinkenberg M., Palzer A., Pineiro C., Aarestrup Moustsen V., Niemi J., Kyriazakis I., Maes D.: Factors associated with specific health, welfare and reproductive performance indicators in pig herds from five EU countries. Prev Vet Med 2018, 159:106–114.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.00630314772Search in Google Scholar

20. Joachim A., Altreuther G., Bangoura B., Charles S., Daugschies A., Hinney B., Lindsay D.F., Mundt H.C., Ocak M., Sotiraki S.: W A A V P guideline for evaluating the efficacy of anticoccidials in mammals (pigs, dogs, cattle, sheep). Vet Parasitol 2018, 253:102–119.10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.02929604993Search in Google Scholar

21. Knecht D., Środoń S., Jankowska-Mąkosa A., Duziński K.: The influence of housing and feeding systems on selected fattening and slaughter parameters of finishing pigs with different genotypes. Animal Production Science 2018:1–9.10.1071/AN16390Search in Google Scholar

22. Lai M., Zhou R.Q., Huang H.C., Hu S.J.: Prevalence and risk factors associated with intestinal parasites in pigs in Chongqing. China, Res Vet Sci 2011, 91: 121–124.10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.01.02521349561Search in Google Scholar

23. Schubnell F., von Ah S., Graage R., Sydler T., Sidler X., Hadorn D., Basso W.: Occurrence, clinical involvement and zoonotic potential of endoparasites infecting Swiss pigs. Parasitol Int 2016, 65:618–624.10.1016/j.parint.2016.09.005710836727639842Search in Google Scholar

24. Solà-Oriol D., Gasa J.: Feeding strategies in pig production: Sows and their piglets. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2017, 233:34–52.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.018Search in Google Scholar

25. Haugegaard J.: Prevalence of nematodes in Danish industrialized sow farms with loose housed sows in dynamic groups. Vet Parasitol 2010, 168:156–159.10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.00919897307Search in Google Scholar

26. Bartosik J., Rekiel A., Klockiewicz M., Górski P., Batorska M.: The effect of housing system on the incidence of intestinal parasite infestation in pigs. J Cent Eur Agric 2012, 13 (4):760–68.10.5513/JCEA01/13.4.1126Search in Google Scholar

27. Knecht D., Jankowska A., Zaleśny G.: The impact of gastrointestinal parasites infection on slaughter efficiency in pigs. Vet Parasitol 2012, 184 (2–4):291–297.10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.00621955735Search in Google Scholar

28. Morgan L., K lement E., Novak S., Eliahoo E., Younis A., Sutton G.A., Abu-Ahmad W., Raz T.: Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows. Prev Vet Med 2018, 160:10–17.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.02630388991Search in Google Scholar

29. Dold C., Holland C.V.: Investigating the underlying mechanism of resistance to Ascaris infection. Microbes Infect 2011, 13 (7): 624-631.10.1016/j.micinf.2010.09.01320934532Search in Google Scholar

30. Idikaa I.K., Nwauzoije H.C., Uju C.N., Ugwuoke C., Ezeokonkwo R.C.: Efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of pig in Nsukka area of Enugu State, Nigeria. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2017, 10: 39–42.10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.07.00631014596Search in Google Scholar

31. Johnson R.W.: Inhibition of growth by pro-inflammatory cytokines: an integrated view. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:1244–1255.10.2527/1997.7551244x9159271Search in Google Scholar

32. Kemp B., Soede N.M.: Reproductive issues in welfare-friendly housing systems inpig husbandry: a review. Reprod Domest Anim 2012, 47:51–57.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02108.x22913560Search in Google Scholar

33. Engblom L., Lundeheim N., Strandberg E., Schneid er M.P., Dalin A.M., Andersson K.: Factors affecting length of productive life in Swedish commercial sows. J Anim Sci 2008, 86:432–441.10.2527/jas.2007-031017998436Search in Google Scholar

34. Langendijk P.: Early gestation feeding and management for optimal reproductive performance. In: The Gestating and Lactating Sows. Chantal Farmer Academic Publishers, Wageningen 2015:27–46.10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_2Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo