1. bookVolume 69 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Nonconformities in Veterinary Cytopathological Examinations: A Retrospective Study of Unsuitable Samples for Analysis

Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the main nonconformities that result in cytopathological samples inappropriate for diagnosis in veterinary medicine. All cytopathological samples, obtained from different canine and feline tissues/lesions, included in the study were received and classified as inconclusive by a single public laboratory of veterinary pathology, located in Pernambuco State, Brazil, between 2012 and 2016. Nonconformities regarding the smear quality, cellularity, presence or absence of hemorrhage, cellular overlapping, desiccation, and presence or absence of necrotic debris and/or artifacts were evaluated. Data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2007; absolute and relative frequencies were calculated using EPIINFO 3.5.2. From the 3268 cases received between 2012 and 2016, 190 cases were selected and comprised 514 inconclusive slides. The most frequent nonconformities detected were insufficient/absence of cellularity in 100% (514/514), inadequate submacroscopic presentation in 87% (446/514), and hemorrhage in 69% (356/514) of samples. Other features identified were cellular overlapping in 34% (175/514), inadequate staining in 31% (175/514), artifacts in 30% (154/514), desiccation in 28% (145/514), and necrotic debris in 26% (133/514) of samples. The implementation of laboratory standard operational procedures aimed at maintaining quality is essential. It is necessary to initially identify the main errors occurring in the processing stages as a way to guide and design strategies to avoid them.

Keywords

1. Maciel RMB: Citologia Aspirativa da Tiróide: Utilidade Diagnóstica Atual e Perspectivas Futuras. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 2001, 45:217-218.10.1590/S0004-27302001000300002Search in Google Scholar

2. Sharkey LC, Wellman ML: Diagnostic Cytology in Veterinary Medicine: A Comparative and Evidence-Based Approach. Clin Lab Med 2011, 31:1-19.10.1016/j.cll.2010.10.00521295719Search in Google Scholar

3. Carvalho FM, Kerr LM: Anatomia patológica e citologia no rastreamento e diagnóstico das alterações mamárias. Rev Bras Mastol 2013, 23:42-47.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ayele L, Mohammed C, Yimer L: Review on Diagnostic Cytology: Techniques and Applications in Veterinary Medicine. J Vet Sci Technol 2017, 8:408.10.4172/2157-7579.1000408Search in Google Scholar

5. Roskell DE, Buley ID: Fine needle aspiration cytology in cancer diagnosis. BMJ 2004, 329:244-245.10.1136/bmj.329.7460.24449801115284126Search in Google Scholar

6. Moore AR: Preparation of Cytology Samples: Tricks of the Trade. Vet Clin Small Anim 2017, 47:1-1610.1016/j.cvsm.2016.07.00127522165Search in Google Scholar

7. Orell SR: Pitfalls in fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathol 2003, 14:173-182.10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00078.x12873307Search in Google Scholar

8. Meinkoth JH, Cowell RL, Tyler RD, Morton RJ: Sample collection and preparation. In: Valenciano A, Cowell RL (Eds.) Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014, 1-19.10.1016/B978-0-323-53314-0.00001-8Search in Google Scholar

9. Gunn-Christie RG, Flatland B, Friedrichs KR, Szladovits B, Harr KE, Ruotsalo K, Knoll JS, Wamsley HL, Freeman KP: ASVCP quality assurance guidelines: control of preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical factors for urinalysis, cytology, and clinical chemistry in veterinary laboratories. Vet Clin Pathol 2012, 41:18-26.10.1111/j.1939-165X.2012.00412.x22390424Search in Google Scholar

10. Sharkey L, Dial SM, Matz ME: Maximizing the Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Small Animal Practice. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2007, 37: 351-372.10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.11.00417336679Search in Google Scholar

11. Fernandes CF, Oliveira TRL: Analysis of the pre-analytical phase in a private pathology laboratory of Maringá City-PR, Brazil. J Bras Patol Med Lab 2016, 52:78-83.10.5935/1676-2444.20160016Search in Google Scholar

12. Ventura RFA, Colodel MM, Rocha NS: Exame citológico em medicina veterinária: estudo retrospectivo de 11.468 casos (1994-2008). Pesq Vet Bras 2012, 32:1169-1173.10.1590/S0100-736X2012001100016Search in Google Scholar

13. Rosolem MC, Moroz LR, Rodigheri SM, Corrêa Neto UJ, Porto CD, Hanel JS: Estudo retrospectivo de exames citológicos realizados em um Hospital Veterinário Escola em um período de cinco anos. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2013, 65:735-741.10.1590/S0102-09352013000300019Search in Google Scholar

14. Haziroglu R, Yardimci B, Aslan S, Yildirim MZ, Yumusak N, Beceriklisoy H, Agaoglu R, Kucukaslan I: Cytological Evaluation of canine mammary tumours with fine needle aspiration biopsy technique. Revue Méd Vét 2010, 161:212-218.Search in Google Scholar

15. Sapierzyński R, Micuń J, Jagielski D, Jurka P: Cytopathology of canine lymphomas (100 cases). Pol J Vet Sci 2010, 13: 653-659.10.2478/v10181-010-0015-221370743Search in Google Scholar

16. Johnson MC, Myers AN: Cytology of Skin Neoplasms. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2017, 47:85-110.10.1016/j.cvsm.2016.07.00627531041Search in Google Scholar

17. Liffman R, Courtman N: Fine needle aspiration of abdominal organs: a review of current recommendations for achieving a diagnostic sample. J Small Anim Pract 2017, 58: 599-609.10.1111/jsap.1270928746730Search in Google Scholar

18. Manrique EJC, Tavares SBN, Albuquerque ZBP, Guimarães JV, Azara CZS, Martins MR, Amaral RG: Fatores que comprometem a adequabilidade da amostra citológica cervical. Femina 2009, 37: 283-287.Search in Google Scholar

19. Traynor D, Duraipandian S, Martin CM, O’Leary JJ, Lyng FM: Improved removal of blood contamination from ThinPrep cervical cytology samples for Raman spectroscopic analysis. J Biomed Opt 2018, 23: 1-8.10.1117/1.JBO.23.5.05500129729092Search in Google Scholar

20. Al-Abbadi M: Basics of Cytology. Avicenna J Med 2011, 1: 18-28.10.4103/2231-0770.83719350705523210005Search in Google Scholar

21. Cian F: Cytology (part 1): sample collection and preparation. Companion Anim 2014, 19: 401-405.10.12968/coan.2014.19.8.401Search in Google Scholar

22. Jadhav KB, Gupta N, Ahmed MB: Maltese cross: Starch artefact in oral cytology, divulged through polarized microscopy. J Cytol 2010, 27: 40-41.10.4103/0970-9371.66698296484721042536Search in Google Scholar

23. Sahay K, Mehendiratta M, Rehani S, Kumra M, Sharma R, Kardam P: Cytological artifacts masquerading interpretation. J Cytol 2013, 30: 241–246.10.4103/0970-9371.126649394562424648667Search in Google Scholar

24. Kahwash SB: Artifacts, Contaminants, and Mimics in Cytology. In: Monaco S, Teot L (Eds). Pediatric Cytopathology. 1sted. Berlin: Springer; 2017, 231-244.10.1007/978-3-662-53441-0_11Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo