Open Access

Positive influence of aminosilanes on anti-EpCAM antibody immobilization on a glass surface

Paula Kamińska

Paula Kamińska

Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical SciencesPoznań, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kamińska, Paula
, 
Karolina Buszka

Karolina Buszka

  • Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical SciencesPoznań, Poland
  • Faculty of Agronomy, Horticulture and Bioengineering, Poznań University of Life SciencesPoznań, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Buszka, Karolina
, 
Przemysław Pietras

Przemysław Pietras

Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation, Poznań Science and Technology ParkPoznań, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Pietras, Przemysław
, 
Maciej Zabel

Maciej Zabel

Department of Anatomy and Histology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona GóraZielona Góra, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zabel, Maciej
, 
Michał Nowicki

Michał Nowicki

Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical SciencesPoznań, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Nowicki, Michał
 and 
Joanna Budna-Tukan

Joanna Budna-Tukan

Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical SciencesPoznań, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Budna-Tukan, Joanna
  
Jun 28, 2021
Positive influence of aminosilanes on anti-EpCAM antibody immobilization on a glass surface's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Published Online: Jun 28, 2021
Page range: 93 - 99
Received: May 16, 2021
Accepted: Jun 09, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2021-0013
Keywords
© 2021 Paula Kamińska, Karolina Buszka, Przemysław Pietras, Maciej Zabel, Michał Nowicki, Joanna Budna-Tukan, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Comparison of average values of contact angles for tested glass slides surfaces: silanized with A, AE, AEE, and non-modified (NM) for areas covered with anti-EpCAM antibody in PBS (25 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL), and for control area covered with PBS (C)
Comparison of average values of contact angles for tested glass slides surfaces: silanized with A, AE, AEE, and non-modified (NM) for areas covered with anti-EpCAM antibody in PBS (25 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL), and for control area covered with PBS (C)

Figure 2

Immunofluorescence intensity of tested glass slides surfaces: silanized with A, AE, AEE, and non-modified (NM) for areas covered with anti-EpCAM antibody in PBS (25 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL), and for control area covered with PBS (C)
Immunofluorescence intensity of tested glass slides surfaces: silanized with A, AE, AEE, and non-modified (NM) for areas covered with anti-EpCAM antibody in PBS (25 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL), and for control area covered with PBS (C)
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry
Journal RSS Feed