Cite

Figure 1:

Abbreviated phylogeny showing the five EPN species used in the current study. Adapted from Kaplan et al. (2012), Spiridonov and Subbotin (2016) and De Brida et al. (2017).
Abbreviated phylogeny showing the five EPN species used in the current study. Adapted from Kaplan et al. (2012), Spiridonov and Subbotin (2016) and De Brida et al. (2017).

Figure 2:

Dispersal responses of five EPN species after exposure to their own macerate. Bars show means +/- SEM. Symbols over bars indicate species that showed statistically significant increases in dispersal after conspecific macerate exposure († = P < 0.10, ** = P < 0.01).
Dispersal responses of five EPN species after exposure to their own macerate. Bars show means +/- SEM. Symbols over bars indicate species that showed statistically significant increases in dispersal after conspecific macerate exposure († = P < 0.10, ** = P < 0.01).

Figure 3:

Dispersal responses of five EPN species after exposure to macerate derived from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora-infected cadavers. Bars show means ± SEM. Symbols over bars indicate species that showed statistically significant changes in dispersal after conspecific macerate exposure (**= P < 0.01). Relative to H. bacteriophora, increasing distance to the right along the graph represents increasing phylogenetic distance, according to Spiridonov and Subbotin (2016).
Dispersal responses of five EPN species after exposure to macerate derived from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora-infected cadavers. Bars show means ± SEM. Symbols over bars indicate species that showed statistically significant changes in dispersal after conspecific macerate exposure (**= P < 0.01). Relative to H. bacteriophora, increasing distance to the right along the graph represents increasing phylogenetic distance, according to Spiridonov and Subbotin (2016).

Average number of IJs infecting G. mellonella larvae after exposure to either DI water, their own macerate, or macerate derived from H. bacteriophora infected cadavers. Data show means ± SEM. Significant effects of macerate exposure based on post-hoc tests comparing DI water to macerate treatment; † = P < 0.10, * = P < 0.05.

Species Own maceratea H. bacteriophora macerateb
DI water Macerate DI water Macerate
H. bacteriophora 0 4.4 ± 1.1* 0 3.2 ± 2.1
H. georgiana 0 15.9 ± 12.5 0.5 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.5
H. megidis 143.7 ± 31.1 83.7 ± 25.4 102.3 ± 50.2 65.3 ± 21.3
H. indica 2.4 ± 1.5 26.1 ± 13.4 2.5 ± 2.5 1.8 ± 0.7
S. feltiae 0 8.6 ± 3.9* 0 0
eISSN:
2640-396X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other