Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Journal of Nematology
Volume 53 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
Open Access
Meloidogyne enterolobii
egg extraction in NaOCl versus infectivity of inoculum on cucumber
Guillermo Gómez-González
Guillermo Gómez-González
,
Isabel Cruz-Lachica
Isabel Cruz-Lachica
,
Isidro Márquez-Zequera
Isidro Márquez-Zequera
,
José Benigno Valdez-Torres
José Benigno Valdez-Torres
,
Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza
Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza
,
Luis Alfredo Osuna-García
Luis Alfredo Osuna-García
and
Raymundo Saúl García-Estrada
Raymundo Saúl García-Estrada
| Jun 22, 2021
Journal of Nematology
Volume 53 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jun 22, 2021
Page range:
1 - 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-057
Keywords
Cucumber
,
Egg extraction
,
Hatching
,
Infectivity
,
Interaction
,
NaOCl
,
Pathogenicity
,
RKN
,
Stirring
© 2021 Guillermo Gómez-González et al., published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:
Effect of combinations of NaOCl concentrations and stirring periods on M. enterolobii egg extraction from cucumber roots. Data are means of 12 replications (six replications/trial). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 2:
Effect of NaOCl concentrations and stirring periods on M. enterolobii hatching. Data are means of 12 replications (six replications/trial). Symbols with the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 3:
Effect of NaOCl concentrations and stirring periods on M. enterolobii reproduction. Data are means of 12 replications (six replications/trial). Symbols with the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. Numbers of produced eggs are presented in thousands.
Figure 4:
Effect of M. enterolobii hatching on inoculum reproduction. Equation derived from linear regression (p ≤ 0.05). Inoculum reproduction is presented in thousands of eggs.
Figure 5:
Effect of NaOCl concentrations on M. enterolobii infectivity on cucumber roots. Inoculum densities of 6,000 ± 60 eggs and 1,500 ± 15 J2 for control treatment. Data are means of 32 replications (16 replications/trial). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.