Comparing Gender Homophily among the Multilayer Media Social Networks of Face-to-Face, Instant Messenger and Social Networking Services: A Case Study of a High School Classroom

Barlow, J. P. 1996. Declaration of independence for cyberspace, available at: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence.BarlowJ. P.1996Declaration of independence for cyberspaceavailable at:https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence10.37514/RNT-J.1996.3.6.21Search in Google Scholar

Baym, N. K. and Ledbetter, A. 2009. Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society 12: 408–427.BaymN. K.LedbetterA.2009Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social networkInformation, Communication & Society1240842710.1080/13691180802635430Search in Google Scholar

Block, P. and Grund, T. 2014. Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Network Science 2: 189–212.BlockP.GrundT.2014Multidimensional homophily in friendship networksNetwork Science218921210.1017/nws.2014.17Search in Google Scholar

Booth, A. and Hess, E. 1974. Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family 36: 38–47.BoothA.HessE.1974Cross-sex friendshipJournal of Marriage and the Family36384710.2307/350992Search in Google Scholar

Borgatti, S. P. and Molina, J. 2005. Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations. Social Networks 27: 107–117.BorgattiS. P.MolinaJ.2005Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizationsSocial Networks2710711710.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, D. M. 2008. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.BoydD. M.2008Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked PublicsPhD DissertationUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley, CASearch in Google Scholar

Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B. 2007. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 13: 210–230.BoydD. M.EllisonN. B.2007Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarshipJournal of Computer-mediated Communication1321023010.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xSearch in Google Scholar

Colleoni, E., Rozza, A. and Arvidsson, A. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication 64: 317–332.ColleoniE.RozzaA.ArvidssonA.2014Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big dataJournal of Communication6431733210.1111/jcom.12084Search in Google Scholar

Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F. and Flammini, A. 2011. “Political polarization on Twitter”, Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona.ConoverM. D.RatkiewiczJ.FranciscoM.GonçalvesB.MenczerF.FlamminiA.2011“Political polarization on Twitter”Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez, S. and Hollstein, B. 2014. Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Design and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.DomínguezS.HollsteinB.2014Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Design and ApplicationsCambridge University PressNew York, NY10.1017/CBO9781139227193Search in Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. 2007. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 12: 1143–1168.EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC.2007The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sitesJournal of Computer-mediated Communication121143116810.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.xSearch in Google Scholar

Feld, S. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.FeldS.1981The focused organization of social tiesAmerican Journal of Sociology861015103510.1086/227352Search in Google Scholar

Feld, S. and Grofman, B. 2009. “Homophily and the focused organization of ties”, In Hedstrom, P. and Bearman, P. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 521–543.FeldS.GrofmanB.2009“Homophily and the focused organization of ties”InHedstromP.BearmanP.(Eds)The Oxford Handbook of Analytical SociologyOxford University PressNew York, NY521543Search in Google Scholar

Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A. and Morris, M. 2009. Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 46: 103–125.GoodreauS. M.KittsJ. A.MorrisM.2009Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networksDemography4610312510.1353/dem.0.0045Search in Google Scholar

Hallinan, M. T. and Williams, R. A. 1989. Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. American Sociological Review 54: 67–78.HallinanM. T.WilliamsR. A.1989Interracial friendship choices in secondary schoolsAmerican Sociological Review54677810.2307/2095662Search in Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, C. 2001. Exploring multiplexity: social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society 17: 211–226.HaythornthwaiteC.2001Exploring multiplexity: social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning classThe Information Society1721122610.1080/01972240152493065Search in Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, C. 2005. Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society 8: 125–147.HaythornthwaiteC.2005Social networks and Internet connectivity effectsInformation, Community & Society812514710.1080/13691180500146185Search in Google Scholar

Hristova, D., Musolesi, M. and Mascolo, C. 2014. “Keep your friends close and your Facebook friends closer: A multiplex network approach to the analysis of offline and online social ties”, Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, MI.HristovaD.MusolesiM.MascoloC.2014“Keep your friends close and your Facebook friends closer: A multiplex network approach to the analysis of offline and online social ties”Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, MI10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14544Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, D. R. 2007. Curved exponential family models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 216–230.HunterD. R.2007Curved exponential family models for social networksSocial Networks2921623010.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Igarashi, T. 2013. “Longitudinal changes in face-to-face and text message-mediated friendship networks”, In Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. and Robins, G. (Eds), Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 248–259.IgarashiT.2013“Longitudinal changes in face-to-face and text message-mediated friendship networks”InLusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG.(Eds)Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and ApplicationsCambridge University PressNew York, NY248259Search in Google Scholar

Igarashi, T., Takai, J. and Yoshida, T. 2005. Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: a longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22: 691–713.IgarashiT.TakaiJ.YoshidaT.2005Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: a longitudinal studyJournal of Social and Personal Relationships2269171310.1177/0265407505056492Search in Google Scholar

Kalmijn, M. 2002. Sex segregation of friendship networks. Individual and structural determinants of having cross-sex friends. European Sociological Review 18: 101–117.KalmijnM.2002Sex segregation of friendship networks. Individual and structural determinants of having cross-sex friendsEuropean Sociological Review1810111710.1093/esr/18.1.101Search in Google Scholar

Kandel, D. B. 1978. Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology 84: 427–436.KandelD. B.1978Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendshipsAmerican Journal of Sociology8442743610.4324/9781351153683-14Search in Google Scholar

Kendall, L. 2002. Hanging out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online. University of California Press, Berkeley.KendallL.2002Hanging out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships OnlineUniversity of California Press, Berkeley10.1525/california/9780520230361.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39: 1123–1134.KieslerS.SiegelJ.McGuireT.1984Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communicationAmerican Psychologist391123113410.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123Search in Google Scholar

Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y. and Porter, M. A. 2014. Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks 2: 203–271.KiveläM.ArenasA.BarthelemyM.GleesonJ. P.MorenoY.PorterM. A.2014Multilayer networksJournal of Complex Networks220327110.1093/comnet/cnu016Search in Google Scholar

Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R. N. 1988. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 123–140.KrackhardtD.SternR. N.1988Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulationSocial Psychology Quarterly5112314010.2307/2786835Search in Google Scholar

Laniado, D., Volkovich, Y., Kappler, K. and Kaltenbrunner, A. 2016. “Gender homophily in online dyadic and triadic relationships”, EPJ Data Science, 5.LaniadoD.VolkovichY.KapplerK.KaltenbrunnerA.2016“Gender homophily in online dyadic and triadic relationships”EPJ Data Science510.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0080-6Search in Google Scholar

Leszczensky, L. and Pink, S. 2015. Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom-and grade-level networks. Social Networks 42: 18–26.LeszczenskyL.PinkS.2015Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom-and grade-level networksSocial Networks42182610.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.002Search in Google Scholar

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M.2001Birds of a feather: homophily in social networksAnnual Review of Sociology2741544410.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415Search in Google Scholar

Mehta, C. M. and Strough, J. 2009. Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review 29: 201–220.MehtaC. M.StroughJ.2009Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life spanDevelopmental Review2920122010.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Meyrowitz, J. 1986. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.MeyrowitzJ.1986No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social BehaviorOxford University PressNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Moody, J. 2001. Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology 107: 679–716.MoodyJ.2001Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in AmericaAmerican Journal of Sociology10767971610.1086/338954Search in Google Scholar

Mouw, T. and Entwisle, B. 2006. Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schools. American Journal of Sociology 112: 394–441.MouwT.EntwisleB.2006Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schoolsAmerican Journal of Sociology11239444110.1086/506415Search in Google Scholar

Omi, Y. 2015. “The potential of the globalization of education in Japan: the Japanese Style of School Sports Activities (Bukatsu)”, In Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M. and de Sousa Bastos, A. C. (Eds), Educational Contexts and Borders through a Cultural Lens: Looking Inside, Viewing Outside, Springer, New York, NY, 255–266.OmiY.2015“The potential of the globalization of education in Japan: the Japanese Style of School Sports Activities (Bukatsu)”InMarsicoG.DazzaniV.RistumM.de Sousa BastosA. C.(Eds)Educational Contexts and Borders through a Cultural Lens: Looking Inside, Viewing OutsideSpringerNew York, NY25526610.1007/978-3-319-18765-5_18Search in Google Scholar

Parks, M. R. and Floyd, K. 1996. Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication 46: 80–97.ParksM. R.FloydK.1996Making friends in cyberspaceJournal of Communication46809710.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.xSearch in Google Scholar

Parks, M. R. and Roberts, L. D. 1998. Making MOOsic’: the development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15: 517–537.ParksM. R.RobertsL. D.1998Making MOOsic’: the development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterpartsJournal of Social and Personal Relationships1551753710.1177/0265407598154005Search in Google Scholar

Rheingold, H. 1993. The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, MA.RheingoldH.1993The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized WorldAddison-Wesley Longman PublishingBoston, MASearch in Google Scholar

Robins, G. 2015. Doing Social Network Research: Network-based Research Design for Social Scientists. Sage, London.RobinsG.2015Doing Social Network Research: Network-based Research Design for Social ScientistsSageLondon10.4135/9781473916753Search in Google Scholar

Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y. and Lusher, D. 2007. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 173–191.RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD.2007An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networksSocial Networks2917319110.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Shrum, W., Cheek, N. H. and Hunter, S. M. 1988. Friendship in school: gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education 61: 227–239.ShrumW.CheekN. H.HunterS. M.1988Friendship in school: gender and racial homophilySociology of Education6122723910.2307/2112441Search in Google Scholar

Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. 1986. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32: 1492–1512.SproullL.KieslerS.1986Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communicationManagement Science321492151210.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492Search in Google Scholar

Stehlé, J., Charbonnier, F., Picard, T., Cattuto, C. and Barrat, A. 2013. Gender homophily from spatial behavior in a primary school: a sociometric study. Social Networks 35: 604–613.StehléJ.CharbonnierF.PicardT.CattutoC.BarratA.2013Gender homophily from spatial behavior in a primary school: a sociometric studySocial Networks3560461310.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Takehara, K., Misago, C. and Honda, Y. 2006. Sexual behavior and sex education needs among high school students. Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology 72: 215–224.TakeharaK.MisagoC.HondaY.2006Sexual behavior and sex education needs among high school studentsJapanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology7221522410.3861/jshhe.72.215Search in Google Scholar

Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. 2006. A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools 13: 12–28.TeddlieC.TashakkoriA.2006A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methodsResearch in the Schools131228Search in Google Scholar

Thelwall, M. 2009. Homophily in myspace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 219–231.ThelwallM.2009Homophily in myspaceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6021923110.1002/asi.20978Search in Google Scholar

Walther, J. B. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communication Research 19: 52–90.WaltherJ. B.1992Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspectiveCommunication Research19529010.1177/009365092019001003Search in Google Scholar

Walther, J. B. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23: 3–43.WaltherJ. B.1996Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interactionCommunication Research2334310.1177/009365096023001001Search in Google Scholar

Wimmer, A. and Lewis, K. 2010. Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology 116: 583–642.WimmerA.LewisK.2010Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on FacebookAmerican Journal of Sociology11658364210.1086/653658Search in Google Scholar