Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Connections
Volume 37 (2017): Issue 1-2 (January 2017)
Open Access
Networks and Institutionalization: A Neo-structural Approach
Emmanuel Lazega
Emmanuel Lazega
| Jun 04, 2018
Connections
Volume 37 (2017): Issue 1-2 (January 2017)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jun 04, 2018
Page range:
7 - 22
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2017-001
© 2017 Emmanuel Lazega published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Status inconsistency and conflicts of interests at the Commercial Court of Paris: Composition of Chambers in 2000. Judges-bankers in pink
Figure 2
How do bankers exercise epistemic control in the court and dominate as multi-status oligarchs? Cyclical dynamics (centralization-decentralization-recentralization) of status in advice networks among all judges Red: Super-central core, Green: 1st Semi-periphery, Yellow: 2nd Semi-periphery, Blue: Periphery
Figure 3.1
Reading network
Figure 3.2
Discussion network
Figure 3.3
Reference network
Figure 3.4
Uniform network. Judges perceived by their peers as closest to a future uniform European position (the future ‘European Compromise’, if any) *: Super-central judges. Source: Lazega (2012)