Open Access

Networks and Institutionalization: A Neo-structural Approach


Cite

Figure 1

Status inconsistency and conflicts of interests at the Commercial Court of Paris: Composition of Chambers in 2000. Judges-bankers in pink
Status inconsistency and conflicts of interests at the Commercial Court of Paris: Composition of Chambers in 2000. Judges-bankers in pink

Figure 2

How do bankers exercise epistemic control in the court and dominate as multi-status oligarchs? Cyclical dynamics (centralization-decentralization-recentralization) of status in advice networks among all judges

Red: Super-central core, Green: 1st Semi-periphery, Yellow: 2nd Semi-periphery, Blue: Periphery
How do bankers exercise epistemic control in the court and dominate as multi-status oligarchs? Cyclical dynamics (centralization-decentralization-recentralization) of status in advice networks among all judges Red: Super-central core, Green: 1st Semi-periphery, Yellow: 2nd Semi-periphery, Blue: Periphery

Figure 3.1

Reading network
Reading network

Figure 3.2

Discussion network
Discussion network

Figure 3.3

Reference network
Reference network

Figure 3.4

Uniform network. Judges perceived by their peers as closest to a future uniform European position (the future ‘European Compromise’, if any)
*: Super-central judges. Source: Lazega (2012)
Uniform network. Judges perceived by their peers as closest to a future uniform European position (the future ‘European Compromise’, if any) *: Super-central judges. Source: Lazega (2012)
eISSN:
0226-1766
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, other