This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Mills JRE. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod 1991;18:267–75.MillsJRE. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. 1991;18:267–75.10.1179/bjo.18.4.2671838280Search in Google Scholar
Batista KBSL, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;00:CD003452, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.BatistaKBSLThiruvenkatachariBHarrisonJEO’BrienKD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents (Review). 2018;00:CD003452, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.649441129534303Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:375–88.RufSPancherzH. Temporomandibular joint adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. 1998;20:375–88.10.1093/ejo/20.4.3759753819Search in Google Scholar
Mills JRE. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod 1978;5:133–43.MillsJRE. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the skeletal pattern. 1978;5:133–43.10.1179/bjo.5.3.133114202Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:250–8.BisharaSEZiajaRR. Functional appliances: a review. 1989;95:250–8.10.1016/0889-5406(89)90055-32646914Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:125–34.PancherzH. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. 1984;85:125–34.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90004-66594053Search in Google Scholar
Pacha MM, Fleming PS, Johal A. A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:621–630.PachaMMFlemingPSJohalA. A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. 2016;38:621–630.10.1093/ejo/cjv08626628629Search in Google Scholar
Clark WJ. The Twin Block Traction Technique. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:129–138.ClarkWJ. The Twin Block Traction Technique. 1982;4:129–138.10.1093/ejo/4.2.1296955177Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update 1998;25:302.ChadwickSMBanksPWrightJL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. 1998;25:302.Search in Google Scholar
Ab Rahman N, Low TF, Idris NS. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:36.Ab RahmanNLowTFIdrisNS. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia. 2016;46:36.10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.36475130026877981Search in Google Scholar
Salant P, Dillman I, Don A. How to conduct your own survey 1994; New York: Wiley.SalantPDillmanIDonA. .Search in Google Scholar
Macey-Dare LV, Nixon F. Functional appliances: mode of action and clinical use. Dent Update 1999;26:240–6.Macey-DareLVNixonF. Functional appliances: mode of action and clinical use. 1999;26:240–6.10.12968/denu.1999.26.6.24010765761Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho 2003;124:128–37.O’BrienKWrightJConboyF. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. 2003;124:128–37.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00345-7Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62–74.TullochJCPhillipsCProffitWR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. 1998;113:62–74.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70277-X9457020Search in Google Scholar
Flores-Mir C, Major PW. A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:586–93.Flores-MirCMajorPW. A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects. 2006;28:586–93.10.1093/ejo/cjl03417095741Search in Google Scholar
Makhbul MZM, Hassan WNW. A clinical audit of the success rate of removable functional appliances treatment. Malays Dent J 2019;1:61–73.MakhbulMZMHassanWNW. A clinical audit of the success rate of removable functional appliances treatment. 2019;1:61–73.Search in Google Scholar
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119–29.BaccettiTFranchiLMcNamaraJAJr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. 2005;11:119–29.10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005Search in Google Scholar
Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II division I malocclusion: a randomised clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51–61.GhafariJShoferFSJacobsson-HuntU. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II division I malocclusion: a randomised clinical trial. 1998;113:51–61.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70276-8Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:340–7.TullochJFCMedlandWTuncayOC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. 1990;98:340–7.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81491-X2220695Search in Google Scholar
Dolce C, Mc Gorray SP, Brazeau L. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:481–9.DolceCMc GorraySPBrazeauL. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. 2007;132:481–9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.04617920501Search in Google Scholar
Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod 2011;38:247–56.SeehraJFlemingPSNewtonTDiBiaseAT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. 2011;38:247–56.10.1179/1465312114164122156180Search in Google Scholar
Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison J, Worthington H, O’Brien K. Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:47–59.ThiruvenkatachariBHarrisonJWorthingtonHO’BrienK. Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: results of a Cochrane systematic review. 2015;148:47–59.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.03026124027Search in Google Scholar
Al-Moghrabi D, Salazar FC, Pandis N, Fleming PS. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:17–32.Al-MoghrabiDSalazarFCPandisNFlemingPS. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2017;152:17–32.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.01928651764Search in Google Scholar
El-Huni A, Salazar FBC, Sharma PK, Fleming PS. Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:173–81.El-HuniASalazarFBCSharmaPKFlemingPS. Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: a qualitative study. 2019;155:173–81.10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.01130712688Search in Google Scholar