Tooth width measurement using the Lythos digital scanner

1. Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:574-85.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.022Search in Google Scholar

2. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7.Search in Google Scholar

3. Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod 1995;65:327-34.Search in Google Scholar

4. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023Search in Google Scholar

5. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:308-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031Search in Google Scholar

6. Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and conebeam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:140-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018Search in Google Scholar

7. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Naidu D, Freer TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:304-10.10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011Search in Google Scholar

9. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6Search in Google Scholar

10. Roberts CT, Richmond S. The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1997;24:139-47.10.1093/ortho/24.2.139Search in Google Scholar

11. Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 2012;82:1098-106.10.2319/110311-681.1Search in Google Scholar

12. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5Search in Google Scholar

13. Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD, Powers J, Bussa HI, Salas-Lopez AM et al. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80:662-9.10.2319/072409-413.1Search in Google Scholar

14. Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;12:265-92.10.3109/00016355509028167Search in Google Scholar

15. Hunter WS, Priest WR. Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J Dent Res 1960;39:405-14.10.1177/00220345600390022301Search in Google Scholar

16. Coleman RM, Hembree JH Jr, Weber FN. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Am J Orthod 1979;75:438-46.10.1016/0002-9416(79)90166-0Search in Google Scholar

17. Endo T, Uchikura K, Ishida K, Shundo I, Sakaeda K, Shimooka S. Thresholds for clinically significant tooth-size discrepancy. Angle Orthod 2009;79:740-6.10.2319/070208-339.119537863Search in Google Scholar

18. Othman S, Harradine N. Tooth size discrepancies in an orthodontic population. Angle Orthod 2007;77:668-74.10.2319/031406-10217605478Search in Google Scholar