An injectable bone graft substitute to enhance the primary stability of a novel miniscrew – The Sydney Mini Screw

1. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13:201-9.Search in Google Scholar

2. Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary PG. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod 1990;60:135-52.Search in Google Scholar

3. Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:263-7.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01325.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Wilmes B, Ottenstreuer S, Su Y-Y, Drescher D. Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac Orthop 2008;69:42-50.10.1007/s00056-008-0727-4Search in Google Scholar

5. Chen Y-J, Chang H-H, Lin H-Y, Lai EH-H, Hung H-C, Yao C-CJ. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1188-96.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01571.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung H-M, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:9-15.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.032Search in Google Scholar

7. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Čelar AG, Bantleon H-P, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:108-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027Search in Google Scholar

8. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-8.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1Search in Google Scholar

9. Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:779-84.Search in Google Scholar

10. Miyawaki S, Tomonari H, Yagi T, Kuninori T, Oga Y, Kikuchi M. Development of a novel spike-like auxiliary skeletal anchorage device to enhance miniscrew stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:338-44.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.03026232843Search in Google Scholar

11. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:252-9.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130304.x12010155Search in Google Scholar

12. Fernández E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens FC, Planell JA, Best SM. Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications. Part I: Solution chemistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:169-76.10.1023/A:1008937507714Search in Google Scholar

13. Low KL, Tan SH, Zein SH, Roether JA, Mouriño V, Boccaccini AR. Calcium phosphate-based composites as injectable bone substitute materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;94:273-86.10.1002/jbm.b.3161920336722Search in Google Scholar

14. Arisan V, Anil A, Wolke JG, Özer K. The effect of injectable calcium phosphate cement on bone anchorage of titanium implants: an experimental feasibility study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:463-8.10.1016/j.ijom.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar

15. Ru N, Liu SS-Y, Bai Y, Li S, Liu Y, Wei X. BoneCeramic graft regenerates alveolar defects but slows orthodontic tooth movement with less root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:523-32.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.027Search in Google Scholar

16. Ishikawa K, Asaoka K. Estimation of ideal mechanical strength and critical porosity of calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1537-43.10.1002/jbm.820291210Search in Google Scholar

17. Kotnis N, Parasu N, Finlay K, Jurriaans E, Ghert M. Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulphate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumours—a preliminary study of the normal post-operative appearances. Skel Radiol 2011;40:563-70.10.1007/s00256-010-1037-7Search in Google Scholar

18. Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S, Incorvati C. Mechanical properties of three different commercially availble miniscrews for skeletalTHE SYDNEY MINI SCREW WITH BONE CEMENT anchorage. Prog Orthod 2005;6:82-97.Search in Google Scholar

19. Bohner M. Design of ceramic-based cements and putties for bone graft substitution. Eur Cell Mater 2010;20:1-12.10.22203/eCM.v020a01Search in Google Scholar

20. Urban RM, Turner TM, Hall DJ, Inoue N, Gitelis S. Increased bone formation using calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;459:110-7.10.1097/BLO.0b013e318059b902Search in Google Scholar

21. Larsson S, Hannink G. Injectable bone-graft substitutes: current products, their characteristics and indications, and new developments. Injury 2011;42:S30-4.10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.013Search in Google Scholar

22. Burguera EF, Xu HH, Sun L. Injectable calcium phosphate cement: effects of powder-to-liquid ratio and needle size. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84B:493-502.10.1002/jbm.b.30896Search in Google Scholar

23. Komath M, Varma HK. Development of a fully injectable calcium phosphate cement for orthopedic and dental applications. Bull Mater Sci 2003;26:415-22.10.1007/BF02711186Search in Google Scholar

24. Baroud G, Wu JZ, Bohner M, Sponagel S, Steffen T. How to determine the permeability for cement infiltration of osteoporotic cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:283-8.10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00223-0Search in Google Scholar

25. Cehreli M, Akkocaoglu M, Akca K. Numerical simulation of in vivo intraosseous torsional failure of a hollow-screw oral implant. Head Face Med 2006;2:36.10.1186/1746-160X-2-36Search in Google Scholar

26. Hayashi C, Kinoshita A, Oda S, Mizutani K, Shirakata Y, Ishikawa I. Injectable calcium phosphate bone cement provides favorable space and a scaffold for periodontal regeneration in dogs. J Periodontol 2006;77:940-6.10.1902/jop.2006.050283Search in Google Scholar

27. Arisan V, Ozdemir T, Anil A, Jansen JA, Ozer K. Injectable calcium phosphate cement as a bone-graft material around peri-implant dehiscence defects: a dog study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1053-62.Search in Google Scholar

28. Nery EB, Lynch KL, Rooney GE. Alveolar ridge augmentation with tricalcium phosphate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:668-75.10.1016/0022-3913(78)90067-7Search in Google Scholar

29. Bohner M, Baroud G. Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials 2005;26:1553-63.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.01015522757Search in Google Scholar

30. Brunner TJ, Grass RN, Bohner M, Stark WJ. Effect of particle size, crystal phase and crystallinity on the reactivity of tricalcium phosphate cements for bone reconstruction. J Mat Chem 2007;17:4072-78.10.1039/b707171jSearch in Google Scholar

31. Ginebra MP, Driessens FC, Planell JA. Effect of the particle size on the micro and nanostructural features of a calcium phosphate cement: a kinetic analysis. Biomaterials 2004;25:3453-62.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.04915020119Search in Google Scholar

32. Baroud G, Cayer E, Bohner M. Rheological characterization of concentrated aqueous [beta]-tricalcium phosphate suspensions: The effect of liquid-to-powder ratio, milling time, and additives. Acta Biomater 2005;1:357-63.10.1016/j.actbio.2005.01.00316701814Search in Google Scholar

33. Lee H, Kwon S, Seo E, Kim Y-H, Kim S. Preparation and characterization of alpha-tricalcium phosphate cements incorporated with polyamino acids. Macromol Res 2011;19:90-6.10.1007/s13233-011-0113-8Search in Google Scholar

34. Hong C, Lee H, Webster R, Kwak J, Wu BM, Moon W. Stability comparison between commercially available mini-implants and a novel design: part 1. Angle Orthod 2011;81:692-9.10.2319/092410-556.1891973721306226Search in Google Scholar

35. Hong C, Truong P, Song HN, Wu BM, Moon W. Mechanical stability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant designs: Part 2. Angle Orthod 2011;81:1001-09.10.2319/031011-176.1890384721714589Search in Google Scholar