Multidisciplinary treatment of a severe facial asymmetry

1. Proffit W, Fields H, Sarver D. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th edn. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2007;689.Search in Google Scholar

2. Proffit WR. Surgical-orthodontic Treatment. In: Louis S, ed. Mo: Mosby Year Book, 1991;24-70.Search in Google Scholar

3. Pirttiniemi PM. Associations of mandibular and facial asymmetries--a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:191-200.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70038-9Search in Google Scholar

4. Cheong YW, Lo LJ. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management. Chang Gung Med J 2011;34:341-51.Search in Google Scholar

5. Legan HL. Surgical correction of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:189-98.10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80020-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:153-64.10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80017-0Search in Google Scholar

7. Takeshita N, Ishida M, Watanabe H, Hashimoto T, Daimaruya T, Hasegawa M et al. Improvement of asymmetric stomatognathic functions, unilateral crossbite, and facial esthetics in a patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion and mandibular asymmetry, treated with orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:441-54.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.024Search in Google Scholar

8. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetry: a review. Angle Orthod 1994;64:89-98.Search in Google Scholar

9. Edler RD, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. Outcome measurement in the correction of mandibular asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:435-43.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.005Search in Google Scholar

10. Ferguson JW. Definitive surgical correction of the deformity resulting from hemimandibular hyperplasia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33:150-7.10.1016/j.jcms.2005.01.009Search in Google Scholar

11. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia— hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg 1986;14:183-208.10.1016/S0301-0503(86)80290-9Search in Google Scholar

12. Joondeph DR. Mysteries of asymmetries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:577-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70205-8Search in Google Scholar

13. Jones RH, Tier GA. Correction of facial asymmetry as a result of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1413-25.10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.04721813222Search in Google Scholar

14. Marchetti C, Cocchi R, Gentile L, Bianchi A. Hemimandibular hyperplasia: treatment strategies. J Craniofac Surg 2000;11:46-53.10.1097/00001665-200011010-0000911314100Search in Google Scholar

15. Yu HB, Sun H, Li B, Zhao ZL, Zhang L, Shen SG et al. Endoscope-assisted conservative condylectomy in the treatment of condylar osteochondroma through an intraoral approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:1582-610.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar

16. Dolanmaz D, Karaman AI, Gurel HG, Kalayci A, Kucukkolbasi H, Usumez S. Correction of mandibular retrognathia and laterognathia by distraction osteogenesis: Follow up of 5 cases. Eur J Dent 2009;3:335-42.10.1055/s-0039-1697454Search in Google Scholar

17. Schwartz HC. Efficient surgical management of mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:645-54.10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.009Search in Google Scholar

18. Yoshida K, Rivera RS, Kaneko M, Kurita K. Minimizing displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:15-8.10.1053/joms.2001.19264Search in Google Scholar

19. Jeon JH. Surgical treatment planning for the two subtypes of mandibular asymmetry. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;40:205.10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.5.205Search in Google Scholar

20. Costa F, Robiony M, Toro C, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M. Condylar positioning devices for orthognathic surgery: a literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:179-90.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.027Search in Google Scholar

21. Lee JH, Park TJ, Jeon JH. Unilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for the treatment of asymmetric mandibles. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;41:102-8.10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.2.102Search in Google Scholar

22. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4:146-52.10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80016-9Search in Google Scholar

23. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:517-22.10.1093/ejo/21.5.51710565092Search in Google Scholar

24. Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Nesbit SP. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1407-13.Search in Google Scholar

25. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. II. Marginal qualities. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:19-26.10.1007/s0078400500049552813Search in Google Scholar

26. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. I. Esthetic qualities. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:12-8.10.1007/s0078400500039552812Search in Google Scholar