Open Access

USE OF THE MACROMODEL DNS/SWAT TO CALCULATE THE NATURAL BACKGROUND OF TN AND TP IN SURFACE WATERS FOR THE RAC PARAMETER


Cite

Figure 1.

RAC and RACT on a selected calculation profile of a river
RAC and RACT on a selected calculation profile of a river

Figure 2.

An example distribution of RAC and RACT along a river
An example distribution of RAC and RACT along a river

Figure 3.

The Middle Warta catchment
The Middle Warta catchment

Figure 4.

SWB located on the main stream of the central Warta catchment
SWB located on the main stream of the central Warta catchment

Figure 5.

Changing the use of catchments in the Macromodel DNS/SWAT – baseline and variant scenarios
Changing the use of catchments in the Macromodel DNS/SWAT – baseline and variant scenarios

NPC values in rivers of countries located in the Baltic Sea basin [23]

Country TN (mg/l) TP (mg/l)
Denmark 1.2 0.04
Finland - -
Estonia 1.1 0.04
Germany 1.0 0.25
Latvia - -
Lithuania - -
Poland 0.3 – 1.2 0.04
Russia 0.68 0.013
Sweden 0.2 – 0.9 0.01 – 0.02

Parameters of the Macromodel DNS/SWAT for forest areas

parameter description value
BLAI maximum potential leaf area index 5
FRGRW1 fraction of the plant growing season of total potential heat units 0.05
CHTMX maximum canopy height 6
RDMX maximum root depth (m) 3.5
T_OPT optimal temperature for plant growth (°C) 30
T_BASE minimum temperature for plant growth (°C) 10
CPYLD normal fraction of phosphorus in yield (kgP/kg) 0.0003
CNYLD normal fraction of phosphorus in yield (kgN/kg) 0.0015
BIOEHI biomass energy ratio 16
RSDCO_PL plant residue decomposition coefficient 0.05
BMX_TREES maximum biomass for a forest (tons/ha) 1000
MAT_YRS number of years required for tree species to reach full development 50
BIO_LEAF fraction of tree biomass accumulated each year that is converted to residue during dormancy 0.3

List of received TN and TP loads for the base and variant scenarios and percentage share of NPL

TN TP
Number of water bodies (main stream) Baseline scenario (AL) (t/y) Variant scenario (NPL) (t/y) NPL participation (%) Baseline scenario (AL) [t/y] Variant scenario (NPL) [t/y] NPL participation (%)
56 11314 1122 10 471 136 29
57 13232 1577 12 509 132 26
58 13141 2232 17 512 128 25
59 13070 2237 17 532 124 23
60 11271 2209 20 405 121 30
61 15193 2177 14 582 118 20
62 15611 2156 14 715 116 16
63 19357 2167 11 938 114 12
average 14024 1985 14 583 124 21

Comparison of the RACT parameter value with the RAC parameter

Number of SWB (main stream) RAC for TN (t/y) RACT for TP (t/y) RACT for TN (t/y) RAC for TP (t/y)
56 2981 10775 129 437
57 2203 10286 124 418
58 2009 9803 104 400
59 2345 9451 80 387
60 3041 8996 -152 370
61 880 8937 -592 370
62 588 8392 -1069 349
63 -883 8124 -1485 351

Land use for the base and variant scenario

Land use types real conditions Land use types scenario
Artificial surfaces 6.2 Forest 99
Agricultural areas 72.8 Forest 20
Wetland areas 0.1 Wetland areas 0.1
Water bodies 0.9 Water bodies 0.9
eISSN:
1899-0142
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Architects, Buildings