Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment
Volume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
Open Access
Partitions and the Flow of Smoke in Large Volume Buildings
Wojciech WĘGRZYŃSKI
Wojciech WĘGRZYŃSKI
| Apr 01, 2019
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment
Volume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Apr 01, 2019
Page range:
155 - 164
Received:
Aug 18, 2017
Accepted:
Oct 10, 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-016
Keywords
Atria
,
Fire
,
Performance-based engineering
,
SHEVS
,
Smoke control
© 2018 Węgrzyński Wojciech published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
The flow of smoke in an undisturbed smoke plume (a) and plume disturbed by a partition of a building – mezzanine (b)
Figure 2.
Different approaches for smoke control in a shopping mall (own work)
Figure 3.
The flow of smoke out of a compartment (a) and underneath a projecting balcony (b)
Figure 4.
The difference between a flow through an opening with a downstand (a), and without a downstand (b), source: own work
Figure 5.
Froude-number scale modeling (a) and CFD study (b) on a smoke flow through an opening
Figure 6.
Numerical model used in the analysis
Figure 7.
Development of the measurement plane used to estimate the mass flow at the proximity of the investigated partition
Figure 8.
1/10th physical scale model with variable width and height of the opening
Figure 9.
Visual comparison of scale (left) and numerical (right) analysis of a smoke flow through compartment with dimensions 8 x 3.50 m
Figure 10.
The mass flow of smoke with changing width of the opening, for various heights of the opening, at HRR = 2.50 MW
Figure 11.
The mass flow of smoke with changing width of the opening, for various heights of the opening, at HRR = 5.00 MW
Figure 12.
Mass density of the smoke at the height of 2.00 m above the floor, for various sizes of the opening, at steady-state conditions in the compartment, 2.50 MW fire
Figure 13.
Temperature of the smoke at the height of 2.00 m above the floor, for various sizes of the opening, at steady-state conditions in the compartment, 2.50 MW fire
Figure 14.
Mass density of the smoke at the height of 2.00 m above the floor, for various sizes of the opening, at steady-state conditions in the compartment, 5.00 MW fire
Figure 15.
Temperature of the smoke at the height of 2.00 m above the floor, for various sizes of the opening, at steady-state conditions in the compartment, 5.00 MW fire