[
1. Pacini AJ. Roentgen ray anthropometry of the skull. J Radiol 1922;3:230-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1978;73(6):619-33.10.1016/0002-9416(78)90223-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Segner D, Hasund A. Individualisierte Kephalometrie. Hamburg: Dietmar Segner Verlag und Vertrieb; 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Holly Broadbent B. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931:1(2):45-66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22(3):142-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39(10):729-55.10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Freeman RS. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod 1981;51(2):162-71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Taylor CM. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A, point B, and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod 1969;56(2):143-63.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90231-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod 1984;85(5):411-23.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90162-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Jacobson A. Application of the “Wits” appraisal. Am J Orthod 1976;70(2):179-89.10.1016/S0002-9416(76)90318-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Demisch A, Gebauer U, Fela W. Comparison of the three cephalometric measurements of sagittal jaw relationship and AB-Occlusal angle ANB, wits appraisal and AB/occlusal angle. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1977:269-81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod 1983;84(2):133-9.10.1016/0002-9416(83)90177-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Ifesanya JU, Adeyemi AT, Otuyemi OD. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians. Afr J Med Med Sci 2014;43(3):225-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Del Santo M Jr. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129(5):641-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92(2):117-22.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90366-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hall-Scott J. The maxillary-mandibular planes angle (MM degrees) bisector: A new reference plane for anteroposterior measurement of the dental bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105(6):583-91.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70143-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Tiwari R, Shyagali TR, Gupta A, Joshi R, Tiwari A, Sen P. Predictability and reliability of different anterio-posterior skeletal discrepancy indicators in different age groups – a cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(9):ZC80-ZC84.10.7860/JCDR/2016/19195.8560507208627790586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Nagar S, Nagar R, Raghav P. Why WITS? Why not a way beyond? Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5(4):518-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99(2):122-8.10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Fatima F, Fida M, Shaikh A. Reliability of overbite depth indicator (ODI) and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) in the assessment of different vertical and sagittal dental malocclusions: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(5):75-81.10.1590/2177-6709.21.5.075-081.oar512517427901232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Chen ZQ, Qian YF, Shen G, Wang GM. APDI and ODI estimated from substitute palate plane. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2004;13(1):13-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Lara-Carillo E, Kubodera-Ito T, Gonzalez-Lopez B, Montiel-Bastida N, Esquivel-Pereyra G. Cephalometric norms according to the Harvold’s analysis. Int J Odontostomat 2009;3(1):33-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Nouri M, Hamidiaval S, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Basafa M, Fahim M. Efficacy of a newly designed cephalometric analysis Software for McNamara analysis in comparison with Dolphin Software. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12(1):60-9.
]Search in Google Scholar