[1. Meller C, Welk A, Zeligowski T, Splieth C. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs. Quintessence Int 2007;38(7):565-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Dammaschke T, Rodenberg TN, Schäfer E, Ott KH. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):256-60. doi: 10.2341/05-24.10.2341/05-2416827030]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Prabhakar A, Kiran NK. Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10(4):26-34.10.5005/jcdp-10-4-26]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Silva NR, Carvalho RM, Pegoraro LF, Tay FR, Thompson VP. Evaluation of a self-limiting concept in dentinal caries removal. J Dent Res 2006;85(3):282-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500315.10.1177/15440591060850031516498079]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barros JA, Myaki SI, Nör JE, Peters MC. Effect of bur type and conditioning on the surface and interface of dentine. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(11):849-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01507.x.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01507.x16202050]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Neves Ade A, Coutinho E, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: A micro-CT investigation. J Dent 2011;39(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.006.10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.00621111770]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 1999;33(3):171-7. doi: 10.1159/000016513.10.1159/00001651310207191]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Fure S, Lingström P, Birkhed D. Evaluation of Carisolv TM for the chemo-mechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo. Caries Res 2000;34(3):275-80. doi: 10.1159/000016602.10.1159/00001660210867428]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Flückiger L, Waltimo T, Stich H, Lussi A. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro. J Dent 2005;33(2):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j. jdent.2004.07.007.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35(3):205-10. doi: 10.1159/000047457.10.1159/00004745711385201]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Lai G, Lara Capi C, Cocco F, Cagetti MG, Lingström P, Almhöjd U, et al. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73(8):569-80. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1023353.10.3109/00016357.2015.102335325772193]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000;34(2):144-50. doi: 10.1159/000016582.10.1159/00001658210773632]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2006;30(2):115-9.10.17796/jcpd.30.2.xq641w720u10104816491964]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Goyal PA, Kumari R, Kannan VP, Madhu S. Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: A clinico-microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39(2):109-12.10.17796/jcpd.39.2.n25754863557k72725823480]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gupta S, Singh C, Yeluri R, Chaudhry K, Munshi AK. Clinical and micro-biological evaluation of the carious dentin before and after application of Papacarie gel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;38(2):133-8.10.17796/jcpd.38.2.2j237v545437527m24683776]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;36(1):5-9.10.17796/jcpd.36.1.u2421l4j6884721522900437]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Corrêa FN, Rocha RO, Rodrigues Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues CR. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007;31(3):187-92.10.17796/jcpd.31.3.l440852707v3g1u017550045]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28(2):73-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.66739.10.4103/0970-4388.6673920660971]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, da Silva AL, Alfaya TA, Godoy CH, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of long-term chemo-mechanical caries removal using PapacarieTM gel. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22(4):307-13.10.1590/1678-775720130488412682725141203]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Freitas PM, Navarro RS, Barros JA, de Paula Eduardo C. The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation: an SEM evaluation. Microsc Res Tech 2007;70(9):803-8. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20470.10.1002/jemt.2047017576132]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Takamori K, Furukawa H, Morikawa Y, Katayama T, Watanabe S. Basic study on vibrations during tooth preparations caused by high-speed drilling and Er:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 2003;32(1):25-31.10.1002/lsm.1014012516067]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Gutknecht N.: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop of evidence based dentistry on lasers in dentistry. New Maiden: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd.; 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Fried D, Visuri SR, Featherstone JD, Walsh JT, Seka WD, Glena RE, et al. Infrared radiometry of dental enamel during Er:YAG and Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation. J Biomed Opt 1996;1(4):455-65. doi: 10.1117/12.250668.10.1117/12.25066823014790]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Attrill DC, Davies RM, King TA, Dickinson MR, Blinkhorn AS. Thermal effects of Er:YAG laser on a simulated dental pulp: A quantitative evaluation of the effects of a water spray. J Dent 2004;32(1):35-40.10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00137-4]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Cavalcanti BN, Lage-Marques JL, Rode SM. Pulpal temperature increases with Er:YAG laser and high-speed handpieces. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(5):447-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022391303006048.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. DenBesten PK, White JM, Pelino JE, Furnish G, Silveira A, Parkins FM. The safety and effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser for caries removal and cavity preparation in children. Med Laser Appl 2001;16(3):215-22. doi: 10.1078/1615-1615-00025.10.1078/1615-1615-00025]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Dommisch H, Peus K, Kneist S, Krause F, Braun A, Hedderich J, et al. Fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser for caries removal in permanent teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00521.x.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00521.x]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Hadley J, Young DA, Eversole LR, Gornbein JA. A laser-powered hydrokinetic system for caries removal and cavity preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(6):777-85.10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0277]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, et al. Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 1998;26(8):649-56.10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00036-5]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Liu JF, Lai YL, Shu WY, Lee SY. Acceptance and efficiency of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24(4):489-93. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.489.10.1089/pho.2006.24.489]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Hugo B, Stassinakis A. Preparation and restoration of small interproximal carious lesions with sonic instruments. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10(3):353-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Hugo B, Lussi A, Gygax M. The uses of the EVA system (II). The different potential uses of the vibration-grinding principle in dental practice. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1991;101(12):1586-97.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Wicht MJ, Haak R, Fritz UB, Noack MJ. Primary preparation of class II cavities with oscillating systems. Am J Dent 2002;15(1):21-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Vanderlei AD, Borges AL, Cavalcanti BN, Rode SM. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(2):107-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60158-4.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60158-4]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Baraba A, Dukić W, Chieffi N, Ferrari M, Pezelj-Ribarić S, Miletić I. Influence of air abrasion and sonic technique on microtensile bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesive on human dentin. ScientyficWorldJournal 2015;2015:368745. doi: 10.1155/2015/368745.10.1155/2015/368745438670525879053]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Jodkowska E, Raczyńska M, Sobczak M, Remiszewski A. Ocena metody abrazji powietrznej do leczenia próchnicy bruzd i szczelin w zębach stałych – doniesienie wstępne. Dent Med Probl 2003;40(2):295-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Paolinelis G, Watson TF, Banerjee A. Microhardness as a predictor of sound and carious dentine removal using alumina air abrasion. Caries Res 2006;40(4):292-5. doi: 10.1159/000093187.10.1159/00009318716741359]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003;28(5):647-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Tan MHX, Hill RG, Anderson P. Comparing the air abrasion cutting efficacy of dentine using a fluoride-containing bioactive glass versus an alumina abrasive: An in vitro study. Int J Dent 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/521901.10.1155/2015/521901467720726697067]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Banerjee A, Thompson ID, Watson TF. Minimally invasive caries removal using bio-active glass air-abrasion. J Dent 2011;39(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j. jdent.2010.09.004.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Eshghi A, Khoroushi M, Rezvani A. Effect of bioactive glass air abrasion on shear bond strength of two adhesive resins to decalcified enamel. J Dent 2014;11(6):644-54.]Search in Google Scholar