This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Adie, E., & Roe, W. (2013). Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 11–17.AdieE.RoeW.2013Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metricsLearned Publishing261111710.1087/20130103Search in Google Scholar
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLOS One, 4(3), e4803.BollenJ.Van de SompelH.HagbergA.BettencourtL.ChuteR.RodriguezM. A.BalakirevaL.2009Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of sciencePLOS One43e480310.1371/journal.pone.0004803265271519277205Search in Google Scholar
Henning, V., & Reichelt, J. (2008). Mendeley-a last.fm for research? In IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience (pp. 327–328). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.HenningV.ReicheltJ.2008Mendeley-a last.fm for research?In IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience327328Los Alamitos, CAIEEE PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015a). An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 309–320.KoushaK.ThelwallM.2015aAn automatic method for extracting citations from Google BooksJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66230932010.1002/asi.23170Search in Google Scholar
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015b). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: Books and non standard outputs. El Profesional de la Información, 24(6), 724–736.KoushaK.ThelwallM.2015bWeb indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: Books and non standard outputsEl Profesional de la Información24672473610.3145/epi.2015.nov.04Search in Google Scholar
Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (Vol. 2, pp. 451–551). Montreal Quebec, Canada.LiX.ThelwallM.2012F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicatorsIn Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators2451551Montreal QuebecCanadaSearch in Google Scholar
Li, Z., Tate, D., Lane, C., & Adams, C. (2012). A framework for automatic TRIZ level of invention estimation of patents using natural language processing, knowledge-transfer and patent citation metrics. Computer-aided Design, 44(10), 987–1010.LiZ.TateD.LaneC.AdamsC.2012A framework for automatic TRIZ level of invention estimation of patents using natural language processing, knowledge-transfer and patent citation metricsComputer-aided Design4410987101010.1016/j.cad.2011.12.006Search in Google Scholar
Lin, J., & Fenner, M. (2013). Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 20.LinJ.FennerM.2013Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metricsInformation Standards Quarterly2522010.3789/isqv25no2.2013.04Search in Google Scholar
Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2013). Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspective. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 31–34.LiuJ.AdieE.2013Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspectiveBulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology394313410.1002/bult.2013.1720390410Search in Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.MertonR. K.1973The sociology of scienceTheoretical and empirical investigationsChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.MoedH. F.2006Citation analysis in research evaluationBerlinSpringer Science & Business MediaSearch in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1832–1846.MohammadiE.ThelwallM.HausteinS.LarivièreV.2015Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categoriesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6691832184610.1002/asi.23286Search in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. (2016). Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1198–1209. 10.1002/asi.23477.MohammadiE.ThelwallM.KoushaK.2016Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivationsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6751198120910.1002/asi.23477Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638.MohammadiE.ThelwallM.2014Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flowsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6581627163810.1002/asi.23071Search in Google Scholar
Piwowar, H., & Priem, J. (2013). The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 10–13.PiwowarH.PriemJ.2013The power of altmetrics on a CVBulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology394101310.1002/bult.2013.1720390405Search in Google Scholar
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874.PriemJ.HemmingerB. H.2010Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social WebFirst Monday157Retrieved fromhttp://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/287410.5210/fm.v15i7.2874Search in Google Scholar
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.PriemJ.TaraborelliD.GrothP.NeylonC.2010Altmetrics: A manifestoRetrieved fromhttp://altmetrics.org/manifesto/Search in Google Scholar
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131–1143.SudP.ThelwallM.2014Evaluating altmetricsScientometrics9821131114310.1007/s11192-013-1117-2Search in Google Scholar
Sugimoto, C.R., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination via TED videos. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 663–674.SugimotoC.R.ThelwallM.2013Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination via TED videosJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology64466367410.1002/asi.22764Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLOS One, 8(5), e64841.ThelwallM.HausteinS.LarivièreV.SugimotoC. R.2013Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web servicesPLOS One85e6484110.1371/journal.pone.0064841366562423724101Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015a). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 587–606.ThelwallM.KoushaK.2015aWeb indicators for research evaluationPart 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. El Profesional de la Información24558760610.3145/epi.2015.sep.08Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015b). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 607–620.ThelwallM.KoushaK.2015bWeb indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metricsEl Profesional de la Información24560762010.3145/epi.2015.sep.09Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2015). Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1124–1135. 10.1002/asi.23252.ThelwallM.MaflahiN.2015Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readersJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6661124113510.1002/asi.23252Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (in press). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 10.1002/asi.23501.ThelwallM.WilsonP.Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fieldsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.23501Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313–1322.VaughanL.ShawD.2003Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54141313132210.1002/asi.10338Search in Google Scholar
Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century (pp. 847–857). Utrecht: SURF foundation.WoutersP.CostasR.2012Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century847857UtrechtSURF foundationSearch in Google Scholar
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513.ZahediZ.CostasR.WoutersP.2014How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publicationsScientometrics10121491151310.1007/s11192-014-1264-0Search in Google Scholar
