1. bookVolume 5 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2018
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Technological competitiveness of the EU member states in the era of the fourth industrial revolution

Published Online: 23 Oct 2019
Page range: 50 - 71
Received: 15 Jul 2019
Accepted: 20 Aug 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2018
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

The aim of this paper is to investigate the implications of the fourth industrial revolution for technological competitiveness, its definition and measurement methods. An empirical part is aimed at identifying comparative advantages of the European Union in digital technologies. Recently new approaches have appeared to measure digital competitiveness, however they use a broad definition of competitiveness that encompasses not only technological factors but also the macroeconomic and institutional environment (IMD, 2017; WEF, 2018). There is still a limited number of studies focused on the technological dimension of competitiveness in digital technologies. This paper fills the gap by developing a conceptual framework based on patent indicators, i.e. Patent Share and Revealed Technological Advantage indices. It allows a consistent analysis of the comparative advantages of the EU member states in digital technologies to be conducted. The results confirm a huge diversity within the EU in terms of digital technologies, their global impact and comparative advantages.

Keywords

JEL Classification

Abbas A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3-13.Search in Google Scholar

Aiginger, C., & Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness: From a misleading concept to a strategy supporting Beyond GDP goals. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 497-523.Search in Google Scholar

Aiginger, K., Bärenthaler-Sieber, S., & Vogel, J. (2013, October). Competitiveness under new perspectives. (WWW for Europe Working Paper No. 44). Vienna: WIFO.Search in Google Scholar

Archambault, É. (2002). Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons. Scientometrics, 54(1), 15-30.Search in Google Scholar

Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Aschhoff, B., Crass, D., Cremers, K., Grimpe, Ch., & Rammer, Ch. (2010). European competitiveness in key enabling technologies. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). Retrieved from https://nanonet.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/European-Competitiveness-in-Key-Enabling-Technologies.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

BMBF. (2013). Zukunftsbild Industrie 4.0. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Search in Google Scholar

Chiappini, R. (2014). Persistence vs. mobility in industrial and technological specialisations: evidence from 11 Euro area countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 159-187.10.1007/s00191-013-0331-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Choi, D., & Song, B. (2018). Exploring technological trends in logistics: Topic modeling-based patent analysis. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-26.Search in Google Scholar

Cockburn, I., Henderson R., & Stern S. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. (NBER Working Paper, No. 24449). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w2444910.3386/w24449Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Delgado, M., Ketels, Ch., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). The determinants of national competitiveness. (NBER Working Paper No. 18249).Search in Google Scholar

Dernis, H., Guellec, D. & van Pottelsberghe, B. (2002). Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output. STI Review, 27, 129-146. Special Issue on New Science and Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Dziallas, M., & Blindt, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80-81, 3-29.10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

EC. (2010). Europe’s digital competitiveness report 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

EC. (2015). Monitoring the digital economy & society 2016-2021. Brussels: European Commission, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology.Search in Google Scholar

EC. (2018). Digital transformation scoreboard 2018. EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake internal market. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, H., & Omland, N. (2011). The Patent Asset Index: A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios. World Patent Information, 33, 34-41Search in Google Scholar

Fagerberg, J. (1996, September). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39-51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.3910.1093/oxrep/12.3.39Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ferraro, S., Dutt, P. K., & Kerikmäe, T. (2017). Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union member states. Croatian International Relations Review, 23(78), 97-126.Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, G. E., & Helpman, E. (1989). Comparative advantage and long-run growth. (NBER Working Papers 2809). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Guellec, D., & Paunov, C. (2018). Innovation policy in the digital age. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Papers, 59.Search in Google Scholar

Haskel, J., & Westlake S. (2017). Capitalism without capital: The rise of the intangible economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hemais, C. A., Barros, H. M., & Rosa, E. O. R. (2005, July). Technology competitiveness in emerging markets: The case of the Brazilian polymer industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 303-314.Search in Google Scholar

Howells, J., & Michie, J. (1998). Technological competitiveness in an international arena. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3), 279-293.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, M.-H., Chen, D.-Z., Shen, D., Wang, M. S., & Ye, F. Y. (2015). Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields. Scientometrics, 104, 61-86.Search in Google Scholar

IMD. (2017). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2017. Lausanne: The IMD World Competitiveness Center. Retrieved from www.imd.org/wccSearch in Google Scholar

IMD (2018). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2018. Lausanne: The IMD World Competitiveness Center. Retrieved from www.imd.org/wccSearch in Google Scholar

Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group, Forschungsunion.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92(C), 332-345Search in Google Scholar

Kowalski, A. M., Michorowska, B. (2014). Methods for measuring innovation. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Innovation, human capital and trade competitiveness. how are they connected and why do they matter? (pp. 74-78). Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-G. (2009). What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics, 79(3), 623-633.10.1007/s11192-007-2020-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Makhoba, X., & Pouris, A. (2019). A patentometric assessment of selected R&D priority areas in South Africa: A comparison with other BRICS countries. World Patent Information, 56, 20-28.Search in Google Scholar

Marinova, D., & McAleer, M. (2003). Nanotechnology strength indicators: International rankings based on US Patents. Nanotechnology, 14(1), R1-R7(7).10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/201Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mehrotra, D., Sabitha, S., Nagpal, R., & Mattas, N. (2016). Landscape analysis of patent dataset. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21, 211-225.Search in Google Scholar

Ménière, Y., Rudyk, I., & Valdes, J. (2017). Patents and the fourth industrial revolution. The inventions behind digital transformation. Munich: European Patent Office.Search in Google Scholar

Monaco, L., Bell, J. & Nyamwena, J. (2019, February 28). Understanding technological competitiveness and supply chain deepening in plastic auto components in Thailand: Possible lessons for South Africa. (CCRED Working Paper No. 1/2019). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3384027 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.338402710.2139/ssrn.3384027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Montresor, S., & Quatraro, F. (2017). Regional branching and key enabling technologies: Evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography, 93(4), 367-396. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.132681010.1080/00130095.2017.1326810Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review. Retrieved from file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/bkam/Pulpit/Morrar_et_ al_TIMReview_November2017.pdf,17.02.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Narula, R., & Wakelin, K. (1998, September). Technological competitiveness, trade and foreign direct investment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9(3), 373-387.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2009). Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2017). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017: The digital transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268821-en10.1787/9789264268821-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

OECD. (2019). Digital innovation: Seizing policy opportunities. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/a298dc87-en10.1787/a298dc87-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pantano, E., Priporas, K.-V., & Stylos, N. (2018). Knowledge Push Curve (KPC) in retailing: Evidence from patented innovations analysis affecting retailers’ competitiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 150-160.Search in Google Scholar

Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Europe’s technological performance. In C. Freeman, M. Sharp, & W. Walker (Eds.), Technology and the future of Europe (pp. 35-58). London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Planes-Satorra, S., & Paunov, C. (2019, May). The digital innovation policy landscape in 2019. OECD Science and Innovation Policy Papers, 71.Search in Google Scholar

Popp, D. (2005). Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecological Economics, 54(2-3), 209-226.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. (2008). On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014, November). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.Search in Google Scholar

Prud’homme, D. (2016). Dynamics of China’s provincial-level specialization in strategic emerging industries. Research Policy, 45(8), 1586-1603Search in Google Scholar

Radman, G., & Belin, A. (2017). Competitiveness in technology and innovation: How to keep on?. International Journal of Digital Technology & Economy, 2(1), 45-56.Search in Google Scholar

Rassenfosse, G. de, Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720-737.10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C. Araújo, M., & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industry 4.0.: An overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 972-979.Search in Google Scholar

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Search in Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S. (2005). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tijssen, R. & Winnink, J. (2018). Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114(2), 687-699.Search in Google Scholar

Uchida, Y., & Cook, P. (2005). The effects of competition on technological and trade competitiveness. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45(2-3), 258-283.10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J. & Gurinova, K. (2018). The impact of marketing innovation on the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of Industry 4.0. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(2), 132-148.Search in Google Scholar

van Ark, B., Hao, J. X., Corrado, C., & Hulten, Ch. (2009). Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. European Investment Bank, 14(1), 62-93.Search in Google Scholar

van Raan, A. F. J. (2017). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 13-50.Search in Google Scholar

Wallusch, J. (2015). (Un)finished transition. Stock of knowledge in Poland, 1924-2012. Economics and Business Review, 15(1), 89-102. doi: 10.18559/ebr.2015.1.710.18559/ebr.2015.1.7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WEF. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Search in Google Scholar

Weresa, M. A. (2010). Intellectual property rights and competitiveness: evidence from Poland. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 6(4), 233-247.Search in Google Scholar

Weresa, M. A. (2019). Stan i bariery rozwoju Przemysłu 4.0 w Polsce. In A. M. Kowalski, M. A. Weresa (Eds.), Konkurencyjność międzynarodowa Polski w kontekście czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej i Przemysłu 4.0. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar

Wisla, R., & Sierotowicz, T. (2016). Medical technological specializations of central and eastern European regions. Economics and Sociology, 9(3), 195-209. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-3/1710.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-3/17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zamora-Torres, A. (2014). Countries competitiveness on innovation and technology. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(5), 73-83.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo