Open Access

Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester


Cite

Zakaria AM, Mohamed AS, Eldarder AK: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter, biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age measurement accuracy in third trimester of pregnancy. Egypt J Hosp Med 2019; 74: 17–22.ZakariaAMMohamedASEldarderAKComparison between transcerebellar diameter, biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age measurement accuracy in third trimester of pregnancyEgypt J Hosp Med201974172210.21608/ejhm.2019.22065Search in Google Scholar

Goel P, Singla M, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Ramesh CS: Transverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2017; 59: 158–161.GoelPSinglaMGhalRJainSBudhirajaVRameshCSTransverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational ageJ Anat Soc India20175915816110.1016/S0003-2778(10)80017-6Search in Google Scholar

Oladokun A, Oladokun RE, Morhason-Bello I, Bello AF, Adedokun B: Proximate predictors of early antenatal registration among Nigerian pregnant women. Ann Afr Med 2017; 9: 222–225.OladokunAOladokunREMorhason-BelloIBelloAFAdedokunBProximate predictors of early antenatal registration among Nigerian pregnant womenAnn Afr Med2017922222510.4103/1596-3519.70959Search in Google Scholar

Gardosi J: Clinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 21–31.GardosiJClinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction Clin Perinatol 2011;38213110.1016/j.clp.2010.12.012Search in Google Scholar

Chambliss LR, Clark SL: Paper gestational age wheels are generally inaccurate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 145.e1–145.e4.ChamblissLRClarkSLPaper gestational age wheels are generally inaccurateAm J Obstet Gynecol2014210145e1–145.e410.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Goel P, Mukesh S, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Babu CSR: Transverse cerebellar diameter: a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2010; 59: 158–161.GoelPMukeshSGhalRJainSBudhirajaVBabuCSRTransverse cerebellar diameter: a marker for estimation of gestational ageJ Anat Soc India20105915816110.1016/S0003-2778(10)80017-6Search in Google Scholar

Satish Prasad BS, Likhitha S: Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal age. J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13: 49–56.SatishPrasad BSLikhithaSCerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal ageJ Dent Med Sci201413495610.9790/0853-13944956Search in Google Scholar

Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR: Measurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Aust Radiol 2001; 45: 309–312.DaviesMWSwaminathanMBetherasFRMeasurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational ageAust Radiol20014530931210.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00926.x11531754Search in Google Scholar

Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA et al.: Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth, the NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 449.e1–449.e41.BuckLouis GMGrewalJAlbertPSSciscioneAWingDAGrobmanWAet alRacial/ethnic standards for fetal growth, the NICHD fetal growth studiesAm J Obstet Gynecol2015213449e1–449.e4110.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032458442726410205Search in Google Scholar

Naseem F, Fatima N, Yasmeen S, Saleem S: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter with biparietal diameter of ultrasound for gestational age measurement in third trimester of pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013; 23: 322–325.NaseemFFatimaNYasmeenSSaleemSComparison between transcerebellar diameter with biparietal diameter of ultrasound for gestational age measurement in third trimester of pregnancyJ Coll Physicians Surg Pak201323322325Search in Google Scholar

Bavini S, Mittal R, Mendiratta SL: Ultrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimester. J Ultrasound 2021.BaviniSMittalRMendirattaSLUltrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimesterJ Ultrasound202110.1007/s40477-021-00564-033687690Search in Google Scholar

Reddy RH, Pashanth K, Ajit M: Significance of foetal transcerebellar diameter in foetal biometry: a pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: TC01–TC04.ReddyRHPashanthKAjitMSignificance of foetal transcerebellar diameter in foetal biometry: a pilot StudyJ Clin Diagn Res201711TC01–TC0410.7860/JCDR/2017/23583.9968553545028764260Search in Google Scholar

Dashottar S, Senger K, Shukla Y, Singh A, Sharma S: Transcerebellar diameter: an effective tool in predicting gestational age in normal and IUGR pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018; 7: 4190–4196.DashottarSSengerKShuklaYSinghASharmaSTranscerebellar diameter: an effective tool in predicting gestational age in normal and IUGR pregnancyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201874190419610.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184150Search in Google Scholar

George R, Amirthalingam U, Hussain MRK, Aditiya V, Anand AM, Padmanaban E et al.: Can trans-cerebellar diameter supersede other fetal biometry in measuring gestational age? A prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2021; 52: 197.GeorgeRAmirthalingamUHussainMRKAditiyaVAnandAMPadmanabanEet alCan trans-cerebellar diameter supersede other fetal biometry in measuring gestational age? A prospective studyEgypt J Radiol Nucl Med20215219710.1186/s43055-021-00576-0Search in Google Scholar

Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Kaminsky LM, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1596–1600.ChavezMRAnanthCVKaminskyLMSmulianJCYeoLVintzileosAMFetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twinsAm J Obstet Gynecol20061951596160010.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.06216707078Search in Google Scholar

Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1167–1171.ChavezMRAnanthCVSmulianJCVintzileosAMFetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growthJ Ultrasound Med2007261167117110.7863/jum.2007.26.9.116717715310Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2451-070X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other