This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Zakaria AM, Mohamed AS, Eldarder AK: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter, biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age measurement accuracy in third trimester of pregnancy. Egypt J Hosp Med 2019; 74: 17–22.ZakariaAMMohamedASEldarderAKComparison between transcerebellar diameter, biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age measurement accuracy in third trimester of pregnancy201974172210.21608/ejhm.2019.22065Search in Google Scholar
Goel P, Singla M, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Ramesh CS: Transverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2017; 59: 158–161.GoelPSinglaMGhalRJainSBudhirajaVRameshCSTransverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational age20175915816110.1016/S0003-2778(10)80017-6Search in Google Scholar
Oladokun A, Oladokun RE, Morhason-Bello I, Bello AF, Adedokun B: Proximate predictors of early antenatal registration among Nigerian pregnant women. Ann Afr Med 2017; 9: 222–225.OladokunAOladokunREMorhason-BelloIBelloAFAdedokunBProximate predictors of early antenatal registration among Nigerian pregnant women2017922222510.4103/1596-3519.70959Search in Google Scholar
Gardosi J: Clinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 21–31.GardosiJ38213110.1016/j.clp.2010.12.012Search in Google Scholar
Chambliss LR, Clark SL: Paper gestational age wheels are generally inaccurate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 145.e1–145.e4.ChamblissLRClarkSLPaper gestational age wheels are generally inaccurate2014210145e1–145.e410.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.013Search in Google Scholar
Goel P, Mukesh S, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Babu CSR: Transverse cerebellar diameter: a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2010; 59: 158–161.GoelPMukeshSGhalRJainSBudhirajaVBabuCSRTransverse cerebellar diameter: a marker for estimation of gestational age20105915816110.1016/S0003-2778(10)80017-6Search in Google Scholar
Satish Prasad BS, Likhitha S: Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal age. J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13: 49–56.SatishPrasad BSLikhithaSCerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal age201413495610.9790/0853-13944956Search in Google Scholar
Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR: Measurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Aust Radiol 2001; 45: 309–312.DaviesMWSwaminathanMBetherasFRMeasurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age20014530931210.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00926.x11531754Search in Google Scholar
Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA et al.: Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth, the NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 449.e1–449.e41.BuckLouis GMGrewalJAlbertPSSciscioneAWingDAGrobmanWAet alRacial/ethnic standards for fetal growth, the NICHD fetal growth studies2015213449e1–449.e4110.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032458442726410205Search in Google Scholar
Naseem F, Fatima N, Yasmeen S, Saleem S: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter with biparietal diameter of ultrasound for gestational age measurement in third trimester of pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013; 23: 322–325.NaseemFFatimaNYasmeenSSaleemSComparison between transcerebellar diameter with biparietal diameter of ultrasound for gestational age measurement in third trimester of pregnancy201323322325Search in Google Scholar
Bavini S, Mittal R, Mendiratta SL: Ultrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimester. J Ultrasound 2021.BaviniSMittalRMendirattaSLUltrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimester202110.1007/s40477-021-00564-033687690Search in Google Scholar
Reddy RH, Pashanth K, Ajit M: Significance of foetal transcerebellar diameter in foetal biometry: a pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: TC01–TC04.ReddyRHPashanthKAjitMSignificance of foetal transcerebellar diameter in foetal biometry: a pilot Study201711TC01–TC0410.7860/JCDR/2017/23583.9968553545028764260Search in Google Scholar
Dashottar S, Senger K, Shukla Y, Singh A, Sharma S: Transcerebellar diameter: an effective tool in predicting gestational age in normal and IUGR pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018; 7: 4190–4196.DashottarSSengerKShuklaYSinghASharmaSTranscerebellar diameter: an effective tool in predicting gestational age in normal and IUGR pregnancy201874190419610.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184150Search in Google Scholar
George R, Amirthalingam U, Hussain MRK, Aditiya V, Anand AM, Padmanaban E et al.: Can trans-cerebellar diameter supersede other fetal biometry in measuring gestational age? A prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2021; 52: 197.GeorgeRAmirthalingamUHussainMRKAditiyaVAnandAMPadmanabanEet alCan trans-cerebellar diameter supersede other fetal biometry in measuring gestational age? A prospective study20215219710.1186/s43055-021-00576-0Search in Google Scholar
Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Kaminsky LM, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1596–1600.ChavezMRAnanthCVKaminskyLMSmulianJCYeoLVintzileosAMFetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins20061951596160010.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.06216707078Search in Google Scholar
Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1167–1171.ChavezMRAnanthCVSmulianJCVintzileosAMFetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth2007261167117110.7863/jum.2007.26.9.116717715310Search in Google Scholar