Tax Instalment Plans: A Legal Instrument of Financial Sustainability in a Crisis

Act of 29 August 1997 on the Tax Ordinance of Poland (consolidated text of 2023, item 67a, as amended). Search in Google Scholar

Act of 1 December 2009 on the Tax Administration of Slovakia (consolidated text of 2023, item 57, as amended). Search in Google Scholar

Act of 1 January 2011 on the Tax Code of the Czech Republic (consolidated text of 2023, item 156, as amended). Search in Google Scholar

Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic. (2020). Explanatory memorandum to Act No. 386/2020 Sb. (Parliamentary Print 866/0). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (1998, 10 December). Commission notice of 10 December 1998 on the application of the state aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (Official Journal of the European Communities 98/C 384/03). Search in Google Scholar

Czech Fiscal Council. (2020). Fiscal and distributive effect of abolition of the super-gross wage. Prague: Czech Fiscal Council. [online] Available at: https://www.rozpoctovarada.cz/ke-stazeni/informacni-studie-fiskalni-a-distribucni-dopady-zruseni-zdanovani-superhrube-mzdy/ Search in Google Scholar

Haroutunian, S., Osterloh, S., & Slavinska, K. (2021). The initial fiscal policy responses of euro area countries to the COVID-19 crisis. ECB Economic Bulletin, 1, 80–99. Search in Google Scholar

Fatás, A., & Mihov, I. (2003). The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1419–1447. Search in Google Scholar

Furman, J. (2020). Protecting people now, helping the economy rebound later. In R. Baldwin & B. Weder Di Mauro (Eds.), Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: Act fast and do whatever it takes (pp. 191–196). Centre for Economic Policy Research. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 15 May 2012, file ref. Pl. ÚS 17/11. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 22 May 2011, file ref. 2 Afs 88/2010–70. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 3 July 2013, file ref. 1 Afs 15/2013–34. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 4 February 2015, file ref. 3 Afs 74/2014–29. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 19 December 2017, file ref. 8 Afs 181/2017–31. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic of 30 September 2021, file ref. 2 Afs 330/2019. Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Republic of Poland of 22 April 1999, file ref. SA/850/98. Search in Google Scholar

Kalckreu, U. von, & Wolff, G. (2007). Testing for contemporary fiscal policy discretion with real time data. Series 1: Economic Studies, 24. Deutsche Bundesbank. Search in Google Scholar

Kalíšková, K., & Šoltés, M. (2022). We’ve done the math for you: the impact of abolishing the super gross wage, reducing social security contributions and introducing tax holidays. Economics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Search in Google Scholar

Kobík, J., & Kohoutková, A. (2013). Tax code with commentary. Anag. Search in Google Scholar

Kubátová, K. (2018). Tax theory and policy (7th ed.) Wolters Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Macroeconomic Group. (2009). The return of fiscal policy. https://treasury.gov.au/speech/the-return-of-fiscal-policy Search in Google Scholar

Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2020a). Decision No. MF-7108/2020/3901–2 on remission of tax and administrative fee due to an extraordinary event. Financial Bulletin 4/2020, 2–4. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2020b). Decision No. MF-7633/2020/3901–2 on remission of tax, tax advance and administrative fee due to an extraordinary event. Financial Bulletin 5/2020. 2–5. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2020c). Decision No. MF-8592/2020/39–2 on the remission of tax and tax accessories due to an extraordinary event. Financial Bulletin 6/2020. 2–6. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2020d). Decision No. 15195/2020/3901–4 on remission of tax, tax accessories and administrative fees due to extraordinary event. Financial Bulletin 9/2020. 2–12. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. (2021). Decision No. 7413/2021/3901–2 on remission of tax and tax accessories due to extraordinary event. Financial Bulletin 16/2021. 2–8. Search in Google Scholar

Popławski, M., & Charkiewicz, M. (2021). Prolonging payment deadlines of real estate tax instalments to entrepreneurs in connection with Covid-19 in Poland: Basic rules, consequences of the application of the mechanism and selected disadvantages of tax resolutions. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 5(2), 58–69. Search in Google Scholar

Radvan, M. (2018). Taxation of employment income in the Czech Republic. Kwartalnik prawa podatkowego, 1, 23–35. Search in Google Scholar

Radvan, M., & Svobodová, T. (2021). Tax law reforms in (dis)connection with Covid-19. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia, 9(2), 69–84. Search in Google Scholar

Sadiq, K., & Krever, R. (2021). Does tax policy fit in the portfolio of COVID-19 responses? Pacific Accounting Review, 33(2), 212–220. Search in Google Scholar

Šaroch, S., Pavelek, P., & Anderle, M. (2003). Are we rehabilitating fiscal macroeconomic stabilisation? Political Economy, 3, 662–663. Search in Google Scholar

Supreme Audit Office of the Czech Republic. (2023). Annual Report of the National Audit Office for 2022. Prague: Supreme Audit Office of the Czech Republic. [online] Available at: https://www.nku.cz/assets/publikace-a-dokumenty/vyrocni-zprava/vyrocni-zprava-nku-2022.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Tyniewicki, M., & Kozieł, M. (2021). Current problems of financial law in Poland and in the Czech Republic including effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(4), 53–71. Search in Google Scholar