[
Auditing Machine Learning Algorithms: A White Paper for Public Auditors, http://intosaijournal.org/auditing-machine-learning-algorithms/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banaszak B., Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz (2nd ed.), Warsaw 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brennan B., Baccala M., Flynn M., Artificial Intelligence Comes to Financial Statement Audits, CFO. com (2017), http://bit.ly/2Jx3CYO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calo R., Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap (9 August 2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, Review into Bias in Algorithmic Decision-Making (November 2020), https://cdei.blog.gov.uk/2020/11/27/overview-of-our-review-into-bias-in-algorithmic-decision-making/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickey G., Blanke S., Seaton L., Machine Learning in Auditing: Current and Future Applications, ‘The CPA Journal’ 2019, vol. 89, pp. 16–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engin Z., Treleaven P., Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in Using Data Science Technologies, ‘The Computer Journal’ 2019, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 451–453.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EU Guidelines on Ethics in Artificial Intelligence: Context and Implementation, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/640163/EPRS_BRI(2019)640163_EN.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (2020/2015(INI)), O.J. C 404, 06.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (2020/2014(INL)), O.J. C 404, 06.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (2020/2012(INL)), O.J. C 404, 06.10.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Explanatory Memorandum, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts, 21.04.2021, COM(2021) 206 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206&from=IT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gov.uk, The Technology Code of Practice, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-technology-code-of-practice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, A Definition of Artificial Intelligence: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines, 8 April 2019, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kritikos M., Artificial Intelligence ante portas: Legal and Ethical Reflections, European Parliamentary Research Service 2019, STOA/Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/634427/EPRS_BRI(2019)634427_EN.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuźniacki B., Zastosowanie sztucznej inteligencji do prawa podatkowego: Spojrzenie w przeszłość, teraźniejszość i przyszłość, ‘Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego’ 2017, no. 2, p. 67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lausuntopalvelu.fi, Arviomuistio hallinnon automaattiseen päätöksentekoon liittyvistä yleislainsäädännön sääntelytarpeista (eng.Memorandum Assessing the Regulatory Needs of General Legislation Related to Automatic Administrative Decision-Making, https://www.lausuntopalvelu.fi/FI/Proposal/ParticipationNonJsShowReport?proposalId=081aedb9-f440–436f-abad-a71dd-56a6cca.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łożykowski A., Sarnowski J., GovTech, czyli nowe technologie w sektorze publicznym, Warsaw 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maas M.M., Regulating for ‘Normal AI Accidents’: Operational Lessons for the Responsible Governance of AI Deployment, Proceedings of 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES 18), 2–3 February 2018, New Orleans, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), https://matthijsmaas.com/uploads/Maas%20-%202018%20-%20Regulating%20for%20Normal%20AI%20Accidents%20Operational%20Lessons.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Big Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications for Policy Makers (2021), https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD, Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy: Main Findings from the 2021 OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions, Paris 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Neil C., Broń matematycznej zagłady. Jak algorytmy zwiększają nierówności i zagrażają demokracji, Warsaw 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resolution No. 196 of the Council of Ministers of 28 December 2020 on the establishment of ‘Policy for the development of artificial intelligence in Poland from 2020’, Polish Monitor of 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suksi M., Administrative Due Process When Using Automated Decisionmaking in Public Administration: Some Notes from a Finnish Perspective, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Law’ 2021, no. 29, p. 89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szostek D., Is the Traditional Method of Regulation (the Legislative Act) Sufficient to Regulate Artificial Intelligence, or Should It Also Be Regulated by an Algorithmic Code? ‘Białostockie Studia Prawnicze’ 2021, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 45–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tribunal de Contas, https://www.tcontas.pt/pt-pt/MenuSecundario/Noticias/Pages/n20230130–1.aspx.
]Search in Google Scholar