[
Aijmer K., Parallel and Comparable Corpora, (in:) A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Berlin/New York 2009, pp. 275–291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baayen H., van Halteren H., Neijt A., Tweedie E., An Experiment in Authorship Attribution, (in:) Proceedings of JADT 2002, St. Malo 2002, pp. 29–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baayen H., van Halteren H., Tweedie F., Outside the Cave of Shadows: Using Syntactic Annotation to Enhance Authorship Attribution, ‘Literary and Linguistic Computing’ 1996, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 121–131.10.1093/llc/11.3.121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhargava M., Mehndiratta P., Asawa K., Stylometric Analysis for Authorship Attribution on Twitter, (in:) V. Bhatnagar, S. Srinivasa (eds.), Big Data Analytics. Second International Conference, BDA 2013 Mysore, India, December 2013 Proceedings. New York/Dordrecht/London 2013, pp. 37–47.10.1007/978-3-319-03689-2_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhatia V.K., Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice, New York 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biel Ł., Lost in the Eurofog: The Textual Fit of Translated Law, Berlin 2014.10.3726/978-3-653-03986-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biel Ł., Phraseological Profiles of Legislative Genres: Complex Prepositions as a Special Case of Legal Phrasemes in EU Law and National Law, ‘Fachsprache’ 2015, vol. 37, no. 3–4, pp. 139–160.10.24989/fs.v37i3-4.1286
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaski C.E., Who’s at the Keyboard? Authorship Attribution in Digital Evidence Investigations, ‘International Journal of Digital Evidence’ 2005, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cordeiro S., Villavicencio A., Idiart M., Ramisch C., Unsupervised Compositionality Prediction of Nominal Compounds, ‘Computational Linguistics’ 2019, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–57.10.1162/coli_a_00341
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coyotl-Morales R.M., Villaseñor-Pineda L., Montes-y-Gómez M., Rosso P., Authorship Attribution Using Words Sequences, (in:) J.F. Martínez-Trinidad, J.A. Carrasco-Ochoa, J. Kittler (eds.), Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications, New York/Dordrecht/London 2006, pp. 844–853.10.1007/11892755_87
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fukumoto F., Suzuki Y., Manipulating Large Corpora for Text Classification, (in:) Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Philadelphia 2002, pp. 196–203.10.3115/1118693.1118719
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gotti M., Investigating Specialised Discourse, Bern 2005.10.3726/978-3-0351-0214-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goźdź-Roszkowski S., Patterns in Linguistic Variation in American Legal English, Frankfurt am Main 2011.10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant T.D., Quantitative Evidence for Forensic Authorship Analysis, ‘International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’ 2007, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–25.10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halteren H. van, Author Verification by Linguistic Profiling: An Exploration of the Parameter Space, ‘ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing’ 2007, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1‒17.10.1145/1187415.1187416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim S., Kim H., Weninger T., Han J., Kim H.D., Authorship Classification: A Discriminative Syntactic Tree Mining Approach, (in:) Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR, July 24–28, Beijing 2011, pp. 455–464.10.1145/2009916.2009979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lapshinova-Koltunski E., Variation in Translation: Evidence from Corpora, (in:) C. Fantinuoli, F. Zanettin (eds.), New Directions in Corpus-based Translation Studies, Berlin 2015, pp. 93–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lapshinova-Koltunski E., VARTRA: A Comparable Corpus for Analysis of Translation Variation, (in:) Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia 2013, pp. 77–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lapshinova-Koltunski E., Zampieri M., Linguistic Features of Genre and Method Variation in Translation: A Computational Perspective, (in:) D. Legallois, T. Charnois, M. Larjavaara (eds.), The Grammar of Genres and Styles: From Discrete to Non-Discrete Units, Berlin 2018, pp. 92‒117.10.1515/9783110595864-005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehmberg T., Wörner K., Annotation Standards, (in:) A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Berlin/New York 2009, pp. 484–501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levshina N., How to Do Linguistics with R. Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2015.10.1075/z.195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Longerée D., Mellet S., Towards a Topological Grammar of Genres and Styles: A Way to Combine Paradigmatic Quantitative Analysis with a Syntagmatic Approach, (in:) D. Legallois, T. Charnois, M. Larjavaara (eds.), The Grammar of Genres and Styles: From Discrete to Non-Discrete Units, Berlin 2018, pp. 140–163.10.1515/9783110595864-007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nirkhi S., Dharaskar R.V., Comparative Study of Authorship Identification Techniques for Cyber Forensic Analysis, ‘International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications’ 2013, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 32–35.10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nirkhi S., Dharaskar R.V., Thakare V.M., Authorship Verification of Online Messages for Forensic Investigation, ‘Procedia Computer Science’ 2016, vol. 78, pp. 640–645.10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt H., Tokenizing and Part-of-speech Tagging, (in:) A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Berlin/New York 2009, pp. 527–552.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sprugnoli R., Tonelli S., Novel Event Detection and Classification for Historical Texts, ‘Computational Linguistics’ 2019, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 229–265.10.1162/coli_a_00347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stamatatos E., A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods, ‘Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology’ 2009, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 538–556.10.1002/asi.21001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stamatatos E., Fakotakis N., Kokkinakis G., Automatic Text Categorisation in Terms of Genre and Author, ‘Computational Linguistics’ 2000, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 471–495.10.1162/089120100750105920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stein B., Meyer zu Eissen S., Intrinsic Plagiarism Analysis with Meta Learning, (in:) Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on Plagiarism Analysis, Authorship Attribution, and Near-Duplicate Detection, Amsterdam 2007, pp. 45–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Więcławska E., Discrete Units as Markers of English: Polish Contrasts in Company Registration Discourse. ‘Linguodidactica’ 2020, vol. 24, pp. 309–327.10.15290/lingdid.2020.24.22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Więcławska E., English/Polish Contrasts in Legal Language from the Usage-based Perspective, (in:) L. Lanthaler, R. Lukenda (eds.), Redefining and Refocusing Translation and Interpreting Studies: Selected Articles from the 3rd International Conference on Translation and Interpreting Studies TRANSLATA III (Innsbruck 2017), Berlin 2020, pp. 99–104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Więcławska E., Quantitative Distribution of Verbal Structures with Reference to the Authorship Factor in Legal Stylistics, ‘Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric’ 2021, vol. 66, no. 79, pp. 147‒165.10.2478/slgr-2021-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Więcławska E., Sociolinguistic and Grammatical Aspects of English Company Registration Discourse, ‘Humanities and Social Sciences’ 2019, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 185–195.10.7862/rz.2019.hss.48
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams C., Tradition and Change in Legal English, Bern 2005.10.3726/978-3-0351-0317-5
]Search in Google Scholar