[Balcarczyk J, ‘Zagadnienie formy umowy o arbitraż w świetle art. II (2) Konwencji nowojorskiej o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych oraz w świetle regulacji wewnętrznych’, <http://arbitraz.laszczuk.pl/_adr/49/Zagadnienie_formy_umowy_o_arbitraz_w_swietle_art._II__2__Konwencji_nowojorskiej_o_uznawaniu_i_wykonywaniu_zagranicznych_orzeczen_arbitrazowych_oraz_w_swietle_regulacji_wewnetrznych.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M, Weaving the Web: the Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web (San Fransisco 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis BG, Synder FG, Elliott KE, Manzo PB, Gaitenby A, Larson DA, ‘The First International Competition for Online Dispute Resolution: Is it Big, Different and New?’ (2002) 19(4) Journal of International Arbitration.10.1023/A:1019750603760]Search in Google Scholar
[Del Duca L, Rule C, Loebl Z, ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce – Developing Global Online Dospute Resolution System (Lessons Derived from Existing ODF Systems – Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law)’ (2012) 1(1) Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs.10.2139/ssrn.1970613]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiss O, ‘Against Settlement’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Review.10.2307/796205]Search in Google Scholar
[Geist MA, ‘The Reality Bytes: Regulating Economic Activity in the Age of the Internet’ (1998) 73 Washington Law Review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halla S, ‘Arbitration Going Online – New Challenges in 21st Century?’ https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/2583/2147.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haloush HA, ‘The Authenticity of Online Alternative Dispute Resolution Proceedings’ (2008) 25(3) Journal of International Arbitration.10.54648/JOIA2008026]Search in Google Scholar
[Hang LQ, ‘Online Dispute Resolution Systems: The Future of Cyberspace Law’ (2001) 41(3) Santa Clara Law Review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill R, ‘Will Cyberspace use Cybercourts?’ (1997) International Commercial Litigation. Galloway PD, ‘Is Construction Arbitration ready for Online Dispute Resolution?’ (2013) 30(2) The International Construction Law Review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Junke XU, ‘Development of ODR in China’ <https://law.pace.edu/lawschool/files/iicl/odr/Xu_Junke.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kallel S, ‘Online Arbitration’ (2008) 25(3) Journal of International Arbitration.10.54648/JOIA2008025]Search in Google Scholar
[Katsh E, ‘Bringing Online Dispute Resolution to Virtual Worlds: Creating Processes Through Code’ (2004) 49 New York Law Review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Katsh E, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Some Lesson from the E-Commerce Revolution’ (2001) 28(4) Northern Kentucky Law Review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Katsh E, ‘The New Frontier. Online ADR becoming a global priority’ (2000) Dispute Resolution Magazine.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘Online Dispute Resolution and its Significance for International Commercial Arbitration’, <http://www.lkk.com/data/document/online-dispute-resolution-and-its-significance-forinternational-commercial-arbitration-global.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Kesna JP, Shah RC, ‘Fool us once shame on you – fool us twice shame on us: what we can learn from the Privatisations of the Internet Backbone Network and the Domain Name System’ (1994) 79(1) Washington University Law Quarterly.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumar S, ‘Virtual Venues: Improving Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative to Cost Intensive Litigation’ (2009) 27(1) John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lastowka FG, Hunter D, ‘The Laws of Virtual Worlds’ (2004) 92 California Law Review.10.2307/3481444]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogers V, ‘Managing Disputes in the Online Global Marketplace. Reviewing the Progress of UNCITRAL’s Working Group III on ODR’ (2013) Dispute Resolution Magazine.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rule C, Nagarajan C, ‘Leveraging the Widsom of Crowds: The eBay Community Court and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution’ (2010) ACResolution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schultz T, ‘The Role of Dispute Settlement and ODR’ in A Ingez-Housz, ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, vol. II (Bedfordshire 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Szostek D, Świerczyński M, ‘Arbitraż elektroniczny’ (2006) 16 Monitor Prawniczy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner RI, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace: there is more on the line than just getting “online”’ (2000) 7 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyler MC, Bretherton D, ‘Online Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2003) 7 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wahab MB, ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Digital Inclusion: Challenging the Global Digital Divide’ <http://www.mediate.com/Integrating/docs/ODR%20and%20Digital%20Inclusion%20-%20Mohamed%20Abdel%20Wahab.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinstein JB, ‘Some Benefits and Risks of Privatization of Justice Through ADR’ (1996) 11 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfe JS, ‘Symposium: Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Twenty-First Century: Across the Ripple of Time: The Future of Alternative (or, is it “Appropriate?”) Dispute Resolution’ (2001) 36 Tulsa Law Journal.]Search in Google Scholar
