[1. Bănăduc D., Rey S., Trichkova T., Lenhardt M. and Curtean-Bănăduc A., 2016 – The Lower Danube River-Danube Delta-North West Black Sea: A pivotal area of major interest for the past, present and future of its fish fauna – A short review, Science of the Total Environment, 545-546, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.05, 137-151.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bănărescu P. M. and Bănăduc D., 2007 – Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) fish species (Osteichthyes) on the Romanian territory, Acta Ichtiologica Romanica, II, 43-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Biswas A. K., 2008 – Integrated Water Resources Management: is it working? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 1, 5-22.10.1080/07900620701871718]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Curtean-Bănăduc A., Schneider-Binder E. and Bănăduc D., 2014 − The importance of the riverine ligneous vegetation for the Danube Basin lotic ecosystems, in Cianfaglione K. (ed.), L’importanza degli Alberi e del Bosco, Cultura, scienza e coscienza del territorio, Temi Edit., Trento, Italia, ISBN: 978-88-973772-63-9, I-II, 187-210.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Gumpinger C. and Scheder C., 2008 – Decline of biodiversity as a result of various human impacts related to river regulation – exemplified by several small river catchments (Austria), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 6, 141-148.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hapciuc O.-E., Romanescu G., Minea I., Iosub M., Enea A. and Sandu I., 2016 – Flood susceptibility analysis of the cultural heritage in the Suceviţa Catchment (Romania), International Journal of Conservation Science, 7, 2, ISSN: 2067-533X, 501-510.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hoancă D., Todorescu C. and Roşu A., 2014 – Providing longitudinal connection in case of cross sluicing on water bodies in Banat Hydrographic area, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 16.2, 151-160, DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0024.10.1515/trser-2015-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Ickes B. S., Vallazza J., Kalas J. and Knights B., 2005 − River floodplain connectivity and lateral fish passage: A literature review, U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin, June 2005, 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Jeeva V., Kumar S., Verma D. and Rumana H. S., 2011 – River fragmentation and connectivity problems in Gange River of upper Himalayas: the effect on the fish communities (India), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 12, The Wetlands Diversity, 75-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kay E. L. and Voicu R., 2013 − Developing an ecological and migration system for ichthyofauna on the Crişul Repede River near the City Hall of Oradea, Management of Sustainable Developmen, Sibiu, Romania, 5, 2, 27-33.10.2478/msd-2013-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Voicu R. and Voicu L., 2015 – The proposal of potential solutions in order to restore the Bârzeşti-Brăhăşoaia wetland within the Bârlad hydrographic basin, Lakes, reservoirs and ponds, 9, 2, 77-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Voicu R. and Dominguez L., 2016 − Facilitation fish migration above the discharge sill located on the ialomiţa river near cave Ialomicioara, Annals of Valahia University of Târgovişte, Geographical Series, 16, 2, 44-58.10.1515/avutgs-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[13. van Wilgen B. W., Le Maitre D. C. and Cowling R. M., 1998 – Ecosystem services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: working for water programme, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 9, 378.10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01434-7]Search in Google Scholar