[1. Adams W., Perrow M. and Carpenter A., 2004 – Conservatives and champions: river managers and the river restoration discourse in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning A, 36, 1929-1942.10.1068/a3637]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Barrientos R., Merino-Aguirre R., Fletcher D. and Almeida D., 2014 – Eurasian otters modify their trophic niche after the introduction of non-native prey in Mediterranean fresh waters, Biological Invasions, 16, 1573-1579.10.1007/s10530-013-0622-9]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Beck U., 1992 – Risk Society, Towards a new modernity, Sage Publications, New York, 260.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Blanco-Garrido F., Prenda J. and Narvaez M., 2008 – Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) diet and prey selection in Mediterranean streams invaded by centrarchid fishes, Biological Invasions, 10, 641-648.10.1007/s10530-007-9158-1]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bremner A. and Park K., 2007 – Public attitudes to the management of invasive-non-native species in Scotland, Biological Conservation, 139, 306-314.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[6. CABI, 2015 – Procambarus fallax f. virginalis (Marmorkrebs) in Invasive Species Compendium, Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Clay X., 2011 – Catch and eat crayfish to help the environment, The Telegraph Newspaper, September 2nd 2011, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/8734885/Catch-and-eat-crayfish-to-help-the-environment.html (accessed 16/08/2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Clout M., 2002 – Biodiversity loss caused by invasive alien invertebrates, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 48, 51-58.10.1007/BF02192392]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Coblentz B., 1990 – Exotic organisms: a dilemma for conservation biology, Conservation Biology, 4, 261-265.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00287.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Crandall K. and Buhay J., 2008 – Global diversity of crayfish (Astacidae, Cambaridae and Parastacidae – Decapoda) in freshwater, Hydrobiologia, 595, 295-301.10.1007/s10750-007-9120-3]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Crang M., 1997 – Analysing qualitative materials, in Methods in Human Geography Research, Flowerdew R. and Martin D. (eds), Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 218-232.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Davies C., 2008 – The ultimate ethical meal: a grey squirrel, The Observer Newspaper, Sunday 11th May 2008, http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/may/11/recipes.foodanddrink (accessed 16/08/2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2003 – Review of non-native species policy: report of the working group, Defra, London, 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2008 – The invasive non-native species framework strategy for Great Britain, Defra, London, 42.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2009 – Wildlife management and invasive non-native species, Defra, London, 147.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Dryzek J., 1997 – The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Environment Agency, 2009 – River Basin Management Plan – Anglian River Basin Region, Environment Agency, Bristol, 68.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Environment Agency, 2010a – Apply for a consent to trap non-native crayfish, http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/recreation/fishing/119096.aspx (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Environment Agency, 2010b – Crayfish catch return form, http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/C_C_R_F__09.pdf (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[20. European Union, 2000 – Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT (WWW, accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Fasham M. and Trumper K., 2001 – Review of non-native species legislation and guidance, Defra, Bristol, 145.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Freeman M., Turnbull J., Yeomans W. and Bean C., 2010 – Prospects for management strategies of invasive crayfish populations with an emphasis on biological control, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 211-223.10.1002/aqc.1065]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Gozlan R., Burnard D., Andreou D. and Britton J. R., 2013 – Understanding the threats posed by non-native species: public vs. conservation managers, PLoS ONE, 8, 1, e53200.10.1371/journal.pone.0053200354700523341931]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Gutiérrez-Yurrita P., Martínez J., Bravo-Utrera M., Montes C., Ilhéu M. and Bernardo J., 1999 – The status of crayfish populations in Spain and Portugal in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 161-190.10.1201/9781315140469-12]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Hall M., 2003 – Editorial: The native, naturalised and exotic – plants and animals in human history, Landscape Research, 28, 5-9.10.1080/01426390306534]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Hein C., Vander Zanden M. J. and Magnuson J., 2007 – Intensive trapping and increased fish predation cause massive population decline of an invasive crayfish, Freshwater Ecology, 52, 1134-1146.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01741.x]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO), 1996 – Statutory Instrument 1996 no. 1104, The Prohibition of Keeping of Live Fish (Crayfish) Order 1996, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19961104_en_1.htm (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Hickley P. and Chare S., 2004 – Fisheries for non-native species in England and Wales: angling or the environment? Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 203-212.10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00395.x]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Hill A. and Lodge D., 1994 – Diel changes in resource demand – competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes, Ecology, 75, 2118-2126.10.2307/1941615]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Holdich D., Rogers D. and Reynolds J., 1999a – Native and alien crayfish in the British Isles, in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 231-236.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Holdich D., Gydemo R. and Rogers D., 1999b – A review of possible methods for controlling nuisance populations of alien crayfish, in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 245-270.10.1201/9781315140469-16]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Holdich D., Reynolds J., Souty-Grosset C. and Sibley P., 2009 – A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 11, 394-395.10.1051/kmae/2009025]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2010 – 1092 White-clawed (or Atlantic stream) crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes, http://www.jncc.gov.uk/protectedsites/sacselection/species.asp?FeatureIntCode=S1092 (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Jones P. J. S., 2008 – Fishing industry and related perspectives on the issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals, Marine Policy, 32, 749-758.10.1016/j.marpol.2007.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Juliano S., Lounibos L. P., Nishimura N. and Greene K., 2010 – Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives, Oecologia, 162, 709-718.10.1007/s00442-009-1475-x282196719841945]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kerby J., Riley S., Kats L. and Wilson P., 2005 – Barriers and flow as limiting factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in southern California streams, Biological Conservation, 126, 402-409.10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.020]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Leach M. and Scoones I., 2005 – Science and citizenship in a global context, in Leach M., Scoones I. and Wynne B. (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the challenge of Engagement, Zed Books, London, 15-40.10.5040/9781350222458.ch-002]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Lindqvist O. and Huner J., 1999 – Life history characteristics of crayfish: what makes some of them good colonisers? in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species, How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 22-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Lowery R. and Holdich D., 1988 – Pacifastacus leniusculus in North America and Europe, with details of distribution of introduced and native crayfish species in Europe, in Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation, Holdich D. and Lowery R. (eds), Croom Helm, London, 283-326.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Mack R., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W. M., Evans B., Clout M. and Bazzaz F., 2000 – Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control, Ecological Applications, 10, 689-710.10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Manchester S. and Bullock J., 2000 – The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control, Journal of Applied Biology, 37, 845-864.10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00538.x]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005b – Ecosystems and wellbeing: wetlands and water synpaper, World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., 80.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Momot W., 1998 – An example of how exploitation can increase production and yield in a northern crayfish (Orconectes virilis) population, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 125, 225-233.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Moorhouse T. and Macdonald D., 2015 – Are invasives worse in freshwater than terrestrial ecosystems? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water, 2, 1-8.10.1002/wat2.1059]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Musseau C., Boulenger C., Crivelli A., Lebel I., Pascal M., Boulêtreau S. and Santoul F., 2015 – Native European eels as a potential biological control for invasive crayfish, Freshwater Biology, 60, 636-645.10.1111/fwb.12510]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Natural History Museum, 2008 – The commercial exploitation of Thames mitten crabs: a feasibility study – report to Defra, NHM, London, 81.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2009 – Be Plant Wise, http://www.nonnativespecies.org/beplantwise/, (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2010 – UK Non-native organism risk assessment scheme – Pseudorasbora parva – Topmouth gudgeon, https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/nonnativespecies/index.cfm?sectionid=51 (accessed 27/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2011 – UK Non-native organism risk assessment scheme – Pacifastacus leniusculus – signal crayfish, http://www.nonnativespecies.org/factsheet/factsheet.cfm?speciesId=2498 (accessed 16/8/2016), 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2015 – The Great Britain Invasive Non-native Species Strategy, August 2015, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, 11.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Peay S., 2001 – Eradication of alien crayfish populations, R&D Technical Report W1-037/TR1, Environment Agency, Bristol, 60.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Peay S., Hiley P. D., Collen P. and Martin I., 2006 – Biocide treatment of ponds in Scotland to eradicate signal crayfish, Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture, 380-381, 1363-1379.10.1051/kmae:2006041]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Peay S., 2010 – Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: recommendations on managing them, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 394-395, 03.10.1051/kmae/2010009]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Peay S. and Dunn A., 2014 – The behavioural response of the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus to experimental dewatering of burrows and its implications for eradication treatment and management of ponds with crayfish, Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 26, 277-298.10.1080/03949370.2014.903379]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Poulin B., Lefebvre G. and Crivelli A., 2006 – The invasive red swamp crayfish as a predictor of Eurasian bittern density in the Camargue, France, Journal of Zoology, 273, 98-105.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00304.x]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Rabeni C., 1992 – Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 49, 1714-1721.10.1139/f92-190]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Ramsar Convention, 2003 – New guidelines for management planning for Ramsar sites and other wetlands – COP 8, Valencia, Spain. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-activities-new-guidelines-for/main/ramsar/1-63%5E20857_4000_0__ (accessed 28/08/2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Reeve I. D., 2004 – The removal of the North American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) from the River Clyde, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report no. 020 (ROAME no. F00LI12), 55.]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Reyes-García V., Menendez-Baceta G., Aceituno-Mata L., Acosta-Naranjo R., Calvet-Mir L., Domínguez P., Garnatje T., Gómez-Baggethun E., Molina-Bustamante M., Molina M., Rodríguez-Franco R., Serrasolses G., Vallès J. and Pardo-de-Santayana M., 2015 – From famine foods to delicatessen: Interpreting trends in the use of wild edible plants through cultural ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 120, 303-311.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Robson C., 2007 – How to do a Research Project – A Guide for Undergraduates, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 176.]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Roy H., Preston C., Harrower C., Rorke S., Noble D., Sewell J., Walker K., Marchant J., Seeley B., Bishop J., Jukes A., Musgrove A., Pearman D. and Booy O., 2014 – GB Non-native Species Information Portal: documenting the arrival of non-native species in Britain, Biological Invasions, 16, 2495-2505.10.1007/s10530-014-0687-0]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Scholtz G., Braband A., Tolley L., Reimann A., Mittemann B., Lukhaup C., Steuerwald F. and Vogt G., 2003 – Parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish, Nature, 421, 806.10.1038/421806a12594502]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Selge S., Fischer A. and van der Wal R., 2011 – Public and professional views on invasive non-native species – A qualitative social scientific investigation, Biological Conservation, 144, 3089-3097.10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Stebbing P., Watson G., Bentley M., Fraser D., Jennings R, Rushton S. and Sibley P., 2002 – Chemical ecology: A role in the control of non-native species of crayfish? in Management and Conservation of Crayfish – Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November 2002 Holdich D. and Sibley P. (eds), Environment Agency, Bristol, 175-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Stebbing P., Longshaw M. and Scott A., 2014 – Review of methods for the management of non-indigenous crayfish, with particular reference to Great Britain, Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 26, 204-231.10.1080/03949370.2014.908326]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Stokes K., O’Neill K., Montgomery W., Dick J., Maggs C. and McDonald R., 2006 – The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2829-2852.10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Stokes K., O’Neill K., Montgomery W., Dick J., Maggs C. and McDonald R., 2006 – The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2829-2852.10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Taugbøl T. and Skurdal J., 1999 – The future of native crayfish in Europe: How to make the best of a bad situation? in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 271-280.10.1201/9781315140469-17]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Taugbøl T., 2004 – Exploitation is a prerequisite for conservation of Astacus astacus, Bulletin français de la pêche et de la pisciculture, 372-373, 275-279.10.1051/kmae:2004002]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Valentine G., 1997 ‒ “Tell me about: using interviews as a research methodology”, in Methods in Human Geography Research, Flowerdew R. and Martin D. (eds), Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 110-128.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Van Eijck M. and Roth W.-M., 2007 ‒ Keeping the local local: recalibrating the status of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in education, Science Education, 91, 926-947.10.1002/sce.20227]Search in Google Scholar
[72. West R., 2009 – Non-native crayfish: a new approach to trapping: A review of signal crayfish trapping on the River Lark at Barton Mills, Suffolk from 2001-2009, Lark Angling and Preservation Society, 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Williams F., Eschen R., Harris A., Djeddour D., Pratt C., Shaw R., Varia S., Lamontagne-Godwin J., Thomas S. and Murphy S., 2010 – The economic of invasive non-native species on Great Britain, CABI project report CAB/001/09, Project VM10066, 198.]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Wynne B., 1992 – Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281-304.10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004]Search in Google Scholar