[ABU-AKEL, A., 2002. The psychological and social dynamics of topic performance in family dinnertime conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1787 - 1806.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00054-6]Search in Google Scholar
[BACHRACH, P. and BARATZ, M., 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[BLANKENSHIP, K. and HOLTGRAVES, TH., 2005. The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3 - 24.10.1177/0261927X04273034]Search in Google Scholar
[BLAU, P., 1967. Exchange and power in social life. New York, N.Y.: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[BRADAC, J., BUSCH, J. and GIBBONS, P., 1991. Powerful and powerless language: consequences for persuasion, impression formation, and cognitive response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115 - 133.10.1177/0261927X91102003]Search in Google Scholar
[BRENNAN, C., 1997. Max Weber on power and social stratification: an interpretation and critique. Aldershot: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[CALDWELL, R., 2007. Agency and change: Re-evaluating Foucault’s legacy. Organization, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 769 - 791.10.1177/1350508407082262]Search in Google Scholar
[CROMWELL, R. and OLSON, D., 1975. Power in families. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[DAHL, R., 1997. From authoritarianism to democracy via socioeconomic development. Oslo: Department of Sociology, University of Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[DAVIS, K., LEIJENAAR, M. and OLDERSMA, J., 1991. The gender of power. London; Newbury Park: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[DEFRANCISCO, V., 1998. The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. In: J. Coates, ed. Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 176 -184.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAIRCLOUGH, N., 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[FISHMAN, P., 1978. Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, vol. 25, pp. 397 - 406.10.1525/sp.1978.25.4.03a00050]Search in Google Scholar
[FOUCAULT, M. and GORDON, C., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[GIDDENS, A., 1979. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GIDDENS, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GIDDENS, A., 1988. Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAUGAARD, M., 2002. Power: a reader. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOLMES, J. and STUBBE, M., 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace: a sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOLTGRAVES, TH. and LASKY, B., 1999. Linguistic power and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 196 - 205.10.1177/0261927X99018002004]Search in Google Scholar
[KOLLOCK, P., BLUMSTEIN, PH. and SCHWARTZ, P., 1985. Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 34 - 4610.2307/2095338]Search in Google Scholar
[LEET-PELLEGRINI, H., 1980. Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In H. Giles, P. Robinson and P. Smith, eds. Language and social psychological perspectives. New York: Pergamon.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEEUWEN, T., 2005. Three models of interdisciplinarity. In: R. Wodak and P. Chilton, eds., A new agenda in critical discourse analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.3 - 18.10.1075/dapsac.13.04lee]Search in Google Scholar
[LEEZENBERG, M., 2002. Power in communication: Implications for semantics-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 893 - 908.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00067-4]Search in Google Scholar
[LINELL, P. and LUCKMANN, TH., 1991. Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries. In: I. Markova and K. Foppa, eds., Asymmetries in dialogue. New York: Harvester Weatsheaf, pp.1 - 20.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOCHER, M., 2004. Power and politeness in action: disagreements in oral ommunication. Berlin; New York: M. de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110926552]Search in Google Scholar
[LUKES, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London and New York: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9]Search in Google Scholar
[MADSEN, L., 2003. Linguistic power wielding and manipulation strategies in group conversations between Turkish-Danish children. In: J. N. Jørgensen, A. Dahl and P. Svenoniu, eds. Proceedings of the19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, vol. 31: Bilingualism, pp. 780-795.10.7557/12.38]Search in Google Scholar
[MATOESIAN, G., 2005. Nailing down an answer: Participation of power in trial talk. Discourse Studies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 733 - 759.10.1177/1461445605055424]Search in Google Scholar
[MULAC, A. and BRADAC, J., 1995. Women’s styles in problem solving interaction: Powerless, or simply feminine. In: P. Kalbfleisch and M. Cody, eds. Gender, power, and communication in human relationships. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsade, pp. 83 -105.]Search in Google Scholar
[NG, S. and BRADAC, J., 1993. Power in language: verbal communication and social influence. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’BARR, W. and ATKINS, B., 1998. Women’s language or powerless language. In: J. Coates, ed. Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 377 - 388.]Search in Google Scholar
[REES-MILLER, J., 2000. Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1087 - 1111.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00088-0]Search in Google Scholar
[RUSSELL, B., 2004. Power: a new social analysis. London and New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCOTT, J., 2001. Power: Key concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPENCER-OATEY, H., 1996. Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-24.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00047-X]Search in Google Scholar
[THORNBORROW, J., 2002. Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[TILEAGA, C., 2006. Discourse, dominance, and power relations: Inequality as social and interactional object. Ethnicities, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 476 - 497.10.1177/1468796806070719]Search in Google Scholar
[VARENNE, H., 1987. Analytical ambiguities in the communication of familial power. In: L. Kedar, ed. Power through discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, pp. 129 - 151.]Search in Google Scholar
[VINE, B., 2004, Getting things done at work: the discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.124]Search in Google Scholar
[WARTENBERG, Th., 1990. The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[WATTS, R., 1991. Power in family discourse. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110854787]Search in Google Scholar
[WEATHERALL, A., 2002. Gender, language and discourse. Hove: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEBER, M., 1962. Basic concepts in sociology. New York: Philosophical Library.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEBER, M. and RUNCIMAN, W., 1978. Max Weber: selections in translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810831]Search in Google Scholar
[WEST, C. and ZIMMERMAN D., 1983. Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In: B. Thorne, Ch. Kramarae and N. Henley, eds. Language, gender and society. MA: Newbury House, Rowley, pp. 103 - 117.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEST, C. and ZIMMERMAN, D., 1998. Conversational dominance in mixed talk. In: J. Coates, ed. Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 165 - 175.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEST, C., 1998. When doctor is a ‘Lady’: Power, status and gender in physician-patient encounters. In: J. Coates, ed. Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 396 - 417.]Search in Google Scholar
[WODAK, R. and MEYER.M., 2001. Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, pp.1 - 13. 10.4135/9780857028020]Search in Google Scholar
