[Adger, David. 2004. Core syntax: A Minimalist approach. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parameterizing Agr: Word order, verb movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 491-539.]Search in Google Scholar
[Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and Verb-Second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.112]Search in Google Scholar
[Bentzen, Kristine, Ϸorbjörg Hróarsdóttir, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007a. Embedded V2 in Scandinavian: Empirical observations. Reykyavík: NORMS Verb Placement Workshop.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bentzen, Kristine, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, Ϸorbjörg Hróarsdóttir & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007b. Extracting from V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax: 79: 119-128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2008. Structure and linearization in disharmonic word orders. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), The proceedings of the 26th Western Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 96-104. Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Proceedings Project.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa & Ans van Kemenade. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17-69.10.5565/rev/catjl.32]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2005/2008. Subjects, Tense and verb movement in Germanic and Romance. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3: 24-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2008. Cascading parameter changes: Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Thorhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal Papers, 79-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.113.04bib]Search in Google Scholar
[Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2002. Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129-167.10.1023/A:1023669927250]Search in Google Scholar
[Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Hoskuldur Thráinsson. 1998. Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37-71.10.1111/1467-9612.00003]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik, 89-156. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Danckaert, Lieven. 2012. Latin embedded clauses: The left periphery. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.10.1075/la.184]Search in Google Scholar
[Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 151-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eythórsson, Thorhallur. 1995. Verbal syntax in the Early Germanic languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612312]Search in Google Scholar
[Haeberli, Eric. 2002a. Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English. In David Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change, 88-106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250691.003.0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Haeberli, Eric. 2002b. Observations on the loss of Verb Second in the History of English. In C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax. Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on comparative Germanic syntax, 245-272. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.53.15hae]Search in Google Scholar
[Haeberli, Eric. 2005. Clause type asymmetries in Old English and the syntax of verb movement. In Montserrat Batllori, M. Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 267-283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0016]Search in Google Scholar
[Haider, Hubner. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845314]Search in Google Scholar
[Haider, Hubner. 2012. The VO-OV split of Germanic languages. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Han, Chung-hye. 2000. The evolution of do-support in English imperatives. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 275-295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heycock, Caroline & Antonella Sorace. 2006. Verb movement in Faroese. New perspectives on an old question. Nordlyd 35: 1-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hogg, Richard. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, 67-167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack. 1988. On the role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 42: 25-42. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic Case and morphological Case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110882308]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemenade, Ans van. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 326-352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds.). The structure of language, 246-323. New York: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koeneman, Olaf & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2014. The Rich Agreement Hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 571-615.10.1162/LING_a_00167]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosmeijer, Wim 1986. The status of the finite inflection in Icelandic and Swedish. Working Pa pers in Scandinavian Syntax 26: 1-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297-325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Verb-object order in early Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 132-163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2, 23-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set paremeters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lightfoot, David. 1997. Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Ans van Kemenade, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 253-272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lightfoot, David. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616204]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Bruce. 1968. A guide to Old English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, Samuel & Thomas A. Knott. 1971. The elements of Old English. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The George Wahr Publishing Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2014. Categorial features: A generative theory of word class categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139811927]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2204/2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262-294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.101.14pes]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintzuk, Susan. 1993. Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10. 5-35.10.1515/tlir.1993.10.1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platzack, Christer. 1988. The emergence of a word order difference in Scandinavian subordinate clauses. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, 215-238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platzack, Christer & Anders Holmberg. 1989. The role of AGR and finiteness. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43: 51-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollock, Jean-Ives. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.]Search in Google Scholar
[RAE = Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología- Sintaxis, vol.1. Madrid: Espasa Libros.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.10.1007/BF00205413]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the Minimalist Program. In Cedric Boecx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism 195-219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohrbacher, Bernhard W. 1994. The Germanic languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohrbacher, Bernhard W. 1999. Morphology-driven syntax: A theory of V to I raising and prodrop. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.15]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross, John. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1: 77-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk. 2012. Verb order, object position and information statu in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2: 29-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thráinsson, Hoskuldur. 2010. Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian. Lingua 120: 1062-1088.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.04.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1992. Syntax. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, 168-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vikner, Sten. 1997. V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 189-213. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vikner, Sten. 2001. Verb movement variation in Germanic and Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Tübingen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vikner, Sten. 2005. Immobile complex verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 83-115.10.1007/s10828-004-0726-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Anthony. 1993. English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752995]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Anthony. 1997. The structure of parametric change and V movement in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade &Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 380-393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson, Kristine Bentzen & Þorbjörg Hroarsdottir. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 203-233.10.1007/s10828-007-9014-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wood, Jim. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Heidelberg, Switzerland: Springer Publishing Company.10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, Joseph. 1906. An Old High German primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth M. Wright. 1925. Old English grammar. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
