1. bookVolume 13 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-7278
First Published
29 Mar 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Effects of changing retention time on efficiency of submerged MBR treating different types of grey water

Published Online: 18 Jan 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2018) - Issue 1 (December 2018)
Page range: 29 - 38
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-7278
First Published
29 Mar 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

It is known that grey water reused for non-potable purposes, provides a sustainable solution of water management by reduction of fresh water extraction and can contribute to water status improvement. Although reused grey water is not intended for potable use, the potential for certain contamination and pollution rate still exist and the treatment efficiency represents a key concern for grey water system utilization. Therefore, this paper explores and focuses on treatment efficiency of treatment technology specifically on submerged membrane bioreactor, what is considered as a successfully used technique of grey water treatment. The main aim was to evaluate the pollution removal in variously polluted grey water and consider a treatability of purposed technology, while changing the grey water retention time in bioreactor.

Keywords

[1] Oh, Kai Siang et al. 2018. “A Review of Greywater Recycling Related Issues: Challenges and Future Prospects in Malaysia.” Journal of Cleaner Production 171: 17-29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617322710 (February 7, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boddu, Veera M. et al. 2016. “Gray Water Recycle: Effect of Pretreatment Technologies on Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis Treatment.” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4(4): 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.031.10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Eriksson, Eva, Karina Auffarth, Mogens Henze, and Anna Ledin. 2002. “Characteristics of Grey Wastewater.” Urban Water 4(1): 85-104.10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Li, Fangyue, Knut Wichmann, and Ralf Otterpohl. 2009. “Review of the Technological Approaches for Grey Water Treatment and Reuses.” Science of the Total Environment, The 407(11): 3439-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Matos, Cristina, Ana Sampaio, and Isabel Bentes. 2007. Greywater Use in Irrigation : Characteristics , Advantages and Concerns.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Burrows, W.D., Schmidt, M.O., Carnevale, R.M., Schaub, S.A., 1991. Nonpotable Reuse: Development of Health Criteria and Technologies for Shower Water Recycle. Water Sci. Technol. 24, 81 LP-88.10.2166/wst.1991.0237Search in Google Scholar

[7] Butler, D., Friedler, E., Gatt, K., 1995. Characterising the quantity and quality of domestic wastewater inflows. Water Sci. Technol. 31, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00318-H10.1016/0273-1223(95)00318-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Casanova, L.M., Gerba, C.P., Karpiscak, M., 2001. Chemical and microbial characterization of household graywater. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst. Environ. Eng. 36, 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-10010347110.1081/ESE-100103471Search in Google Scholar

[9] Racek, J., 2016. Methodology of use greywater in the slected objects. Brno University of Tehcnology.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Le Clech, Pierre, Bruce Jefferson, In Soung Chang, and Simon J. Judd. 2003. “Critical Flux Determination by the Flux-Step Method in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor.” Journal of Membrane Science 227(1-2): 81-93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738803004241 (April 18, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ghanizadeh, G., Sarrafpour, R., 2001. The Effects of Temperature and PH on Settlability of Activated Sludge Flocs. Iran. J. Public Heath 30, 139-142.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dyan, M.O., Putra, G.P., Sumardiono, S., Djoko, T., 2015. The effect of pH and operation mode for COD removal of slaughterhouse wastewater with Anaerobic Batch Reactor. Waste Technol. 3, 7-13.10.12777/wastech.3.1.7-13Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ebrahimi, A., Najafpour, G., Mohammadi, M., Babak, H., 2010. Biological treatment of whey in an UASFF bioreactor followed a three-stage RBC. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. - CHEM IND CHEM ENG Q 16, 175-182. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ100315025E10.2298/CICEQ100315025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Kuma, R., 2011. Study of Municipal Landfill Leachate : Recycling and Treatment Using UASBR with post treatment by Constructed Wetland Rajesh Kumar Taneja. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Isma, M.I.A., Idris, A., Omar, R., Razreena, A.R.P., 2014. Effects of SRT and HRT on Treatment Performance of MBR and Membrane Fouling 8, 488-492.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ahmad, M., Khan, Z., Jamal, S., Masoom, M., Aamir, E., 2013. Role of HRT in Biological Treatment of Combined Industrial and Municipal Wastewater. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 3, 766-774. https://doi.org/ISSN 2277 - 4106Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo