High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Bermejo-Luque, L. (2009). Argumentation theory and the concept of epistemic justification. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 285–303Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1952. The continuum of inductive methods. Chicago: University of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar

Hitchcock, D. (1999). The Thomas-Nolt dispute: some lessons about induction. Informal Logic, 19(2), 201–21210.22329/il.v19i2.2328Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. (1962). On Carnap’s version of Laplace’s rule of succession. Mind, 69–7310.1093/mind/LXXI.281.69Search in Google Scholar

Nolt, J. (1984). Possible worlds and imagination in informal logic. Informal Logic, 6(2), 14–1710.22329/il.v6i2.2728Search in Google Scholar

Nolt, J. (1985). More on induction and possible worlds: replies to Thomas and Kahane. Informal Logic, 7(1), 55–6010.22329/il.v7i1.2702Search in Google Scholar

Szymanek, K. (2014). Justification and argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 231–23910.2478/slgr-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, S. (1984). Degrees of validity and ratios of conceivable worlds. Informal Logic, 6(3), 31–34Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Weddle, Perry. (1979). Inductive, deductive. Informal Logic, 2(1), 1–5Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Jonathan. (2011). Varieties of Bayesianism. In D. Gabbay, S. Hartmann and J. Woods (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic vol.10: Inductive Logic (Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 477–552)10.1016/B978-0-444-52936-7.50013-6Search in Google Scholar