Cite

1. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM and Yock PG. ACC Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Committee to Develop a Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies [IVUS]). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478–1492.10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01175-5Search in Google Scholar

2. Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2002 ;90: 210-215.10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02456-6Search in Google Scholar

3. Serruys PW, Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331: 489–495.10.1056/NEJM199408253310801Search in Google Scholar

4. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995;91:676–1688.10.1161/01.CIR.91.6.1676Search in Google Scholar

5. Goods CM, Al-Shaibi KF, Yadav SS et al. Utilization of the coronary balloon-expandable coil stent without anticoagulation or intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1996; 93:1803–1808.10.1161/01.CIR.93.10.1803Search in Google Scholar

6. Laskey WK, Brady ST, Kussmaul WG et al. Intravascular ultrasonographic assessment of the results of coronary artery stenting. Am Heart J 1993;125:1235-1240.10.1016/0002-8703(93)90743-SSearch in Google Scholar

7. Topol EJ and Nissen. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92: 2333–2342.10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2333Search in Google Scholar

8. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 2000;102:523–530.10.1161/01.CIR.102.5.52310920064Search in Google Scholar

9. Jaegere de P, Mudra H, Figulla H et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment: Immediate and 6-months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting In Coronaries (music) study. Eur Heart J 1998; 19 :1214–1223.10.1053/euhj.1998.10129740343Search in Google Scholar

10. Albiero R, Rau T, Schluter M et al. Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions. Circulation 1997; 96 : 2997–3005.10.1161/01.CIR.96.9.2997Search in Google Scholar

11. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, and the POSCH Group. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinates of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patient selection. Circulation 1990;82:1193-1202.10.1161/01.CIR.82.4.1193Search in Google Scholar

12. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshim A, Hayase M et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 2000;102:523–530.10.1161/01.CIR.102.5.523Search in Google Scholar

13. Schwarz RS, Huber KC et al. Restenosis and the prportional neointimal response to coronary injury: results in porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:267-274.10.1016/0735-1097(92)90476-4Search in Google Scholar

14. F Schiele, N Meneveau, A Vuillemenot et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: A multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies—with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32 :320–328.10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00249-6Search in Google Scholar

15. Eshtehardi P, Cook S, Wandel S et al. Impact of incomplete stent apposition on long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 29 2008; 29:338.Search in Google Scholar

16. Park SM, Kim JS, Ko YG et al. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow up of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stent after poststent high-pressure balloon dilation: from the poststent optimal stent expansion trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77 :15-21.10.1002/ccd.2263520928842Search in Google Scholar

17. Choi SY, Witzenbichler B, Maehara A et al. Intravascular ultrasound findings of early stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4: 239-247.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.95979121586693Search in Google Scholar

18. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2: 167-177.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.79949420031713Search in Google Scholar

19. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2: 167-17.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799494Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2335-075X
ISSN:
1820-8665
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other