Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Studia Humana
Volume 5 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)
Open Access
Religious Belief is Not Natural. Why Cognitive Science of Religion Does Not Show That Religious Belief is Trustworthy
Hans Van Eyghen
Hans Van Eyghen
| Nov 16, 2016
Studia Humana
Volume 5 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Nov 16, 2016
Page range:
34 - 44
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2016-0022
Keywords
cognitive science of religion
,
religious epistemology
,
trustworthiness
,
reformed epistemology
,
natural beliefs
© 2016
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.